Channel
@ohmytask
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
215subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001724294532 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ohmytask |
| Created | 1 January 2022 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ohmytask |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:36 | 215 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:47 | 216 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:40 | 216 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 1 January 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 February 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
116 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 66 | 56.9% | |
| 😁 | 16 | 13.8% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 11.2% | |
| ❤ | 10 | 8.62% | |
| 🤩 | 5 | 4.31% | |
| 🆒 | 2 | 1.72% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 0.862% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.862% | |
| 🖕 | 1 | 0.862% | |
| 🥴 | 1 | 0.862% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 116reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 1 January 2022 to 3 February 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An article that worth reading. It’s about comparing Python, Java and Go performance in multi-threaded computations. The article shows the benchmarks of running Matrix multiplication, QuickSort and Conway’s game of life algorithms. These are the algorithms that take more than O(n) time complexity to run. Multithreading could do a lot for speedup the running process of them. - Read Article @OhMyTask
👍4❤1🔥1🆒1
Signed Shahriar Shariati
An optimal system is made of an aware manager and good workers.
🤩5
Signed Shahriar Shariati
Gunicorn with Uvicorn inside I'm up to reading the Gunicorn and Uvicorn source code and playing with the parameters to see the actual process/thread/coroutine management of those. I will write a detailed blog post about it soon but so far I wanna explain to you why it's recommended to use the Gunicorn web server with Uvicorn worker class. The Gunicorn provides powerful worker management with lots of customizations.…
👍5🔥2
Signed Shahriar Shariati
See how distributed you are When it comes to writing apps that use concurrency or parallelism, this question is usually asked: Am I really doing concurrent/parallel? There are some profiling tools that will help you make a good report of the execution of your app. In Python, personally I use viztracer which is very handy. You just need to run your program like: viztracer myapp.py And it will profile the execution o…
👍7🔥3✍1👌1
Signed Shahriar Shariati
ASGI Lifespan First of all, let’s talk a bit about the WSGI, the core of each modern Pythonic web framework. Despite the importance of this protocol, it’s really simple. All you need is a callable (function or class) that follows a specific signature. When you run the application using a WSGI-friendly web server like the Gunicorn, for each HTTP request the web server calls your defined callable with the data of tha…
🔥2❤1
Signed Shahriar Shariati
The Creation of App @OhMyTask
Signed Shahriar Shariati
What I mean by the handler of this channel @OhMyTask
😁10
Signed Shahriar Shariati
Suppose you're looking for a "complete enough" course for async-await programming on Python. Who's better than an active contributor of Python to teach you? Take a look at this amazing ~6 hours course made by Łukasz Langa (Python core developer) https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLhNSoGM2ik6SIkVGXWBwerucXjgP1rHmB&si=eyhr590l6I9DlIZi @OhMyTask
👍13
Signed Shahriar Shariati
Decentralized Brain of Nature What is your first reaction when you see an ant or a group of them? Scream? Get mad? Grap something and try to kill them? OK. Chill out for one minute. Let's observe. Imagine you see a group of ants (more often) and they're living their life, stealing your tiny pieces of food and going back to their colony. Have you ever wondered how they're moving in a specific pattern without chaos? …
👍4🔥2❤1
Signed Shahriar Shariati
Let Ants do the job @OhMyTask
👍4
Signed Shahriar Shariati
Are workers jealous of each other? Assume the point of life of each worker, is the highest amount of assigned tasks. We’re running a distributed processing system. The main process is gonna distribute the incoming tasks to its forked process (workers). How to divide fairly? You know the tasks are indivisible objects. We cannot trim a function and say: Hey worker 1, do up to line 12. Hey worker 2, do the rest. What …
🔥3👍2🥴1🆒1
Signed Shahriar Shariati
Be careful. Your load balancer might make the workers jealous. @OhMyTask
😁6
Signed Shahriar Shariati
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @ohmytask. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Oh My Task!” (@ohmytask), 215 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ohmytask.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.