Channel
@ohisworld
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,490subscribers
+27 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001418990923 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ohisworld |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ohisworld |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:52 | 1,490 | +6 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 05:25 | 1,484 | +4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 1,480 | +5 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:13 | 1,475 | +4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:17 | 1,471 | +4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:03 | 1,467 | +3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:01 | 1,464 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:48 | 1,463 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 7 (20 July 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 365 |
| Reactions total | 7 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 22:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
15 reactions across 5 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 6 | 40.0% | |
| custom 5253542316441875923 | 4 | 26.7% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 26.7% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 6.67% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Join us for the Congress in Tokyo 🇯🇵 📅 On November 29–30, 2026, Tokyo will host the White & Pink Aesthetics Congress — two days of interdisciplinary education covering surgery, periodontology, implant dentistry, prosthodontics, and advanced digital protocols. The program features presentations by leading international experts: 🔹 Frank Schwarz Surgical treatment of peri-implantitis: implant surface decontamination,…
🔥1
Predictable aligner treatment begins not with the digital setup, but with an understanding of biomechanics 🦷 Even carefully planned digital tooth movements are not always fully expressed clinically. This may be due to insufficient anchorage control, the way forces are transmitted through aligners, the limitations of certain tooth movements, or an inappropriate choice of auxiliary mechanics. 📍 On September 3–5 in W…
How will a tooth move after activation — and can you predict it in advance? In orthodontic treatment, the outcome depends not only on the selected archwire, aligners, elastics, or miniscrews. What truly matters is the force system created by the appliance: ▪️ force direction and magnitude ▪️ the position of the center of resistance ▪️ moment ▪️ anchorage ▪️ the biological response of tissues In Dr. Giorgio Fiorell…
❤1💯1🔥1custom 52535423164418759231
When the implant is correctly positioned but the soft tissues still fail, the entire esthetic outcome is compromised ☝️ At Ricardo Kern’s hands-on course, “Soft Tissue Management Around Implants,” we will explore how to create a stable soft-tissue contour, manage cases in the esthetic zone, and improve the predictability of implant rehabilitation. The program includes: ⏺ immediate implant placement and immediate l…
❤1🔥1
🦷 The loss of five anterior teeth combined with severe alveolar bone deficiency presents a clinical situation in which the outcome depends on close coordination between every stage of treatment. This case reviews the multidisciplinary rehabilitation of a patient following severe trauma, including diagnosis, treatment planning, orthodontic preparation, bone grafting, implant placement, and the 2-year outcome. The au…
🔥2❤1custom 52535423164418759231
🪡 The esthetic zone leaves no room for compromise. Root coverage procedures, management of a thin phenotype, and soft tissue reconstruction around implants all require meticulous attention to detail. Every millimeter matters — from flap design and graft fixation to the long-term stability of the gingival margin. We invite you to join Giovanni Zucchelli’s course, where his signature approaches to mucogingival surger…
What Determines the Stability of the Gingival Margin After Root Coverage? When treating gingival recessions in the esthetic zone, it is important to evaluate not only the depth of the defect and the ability to advance the flap coronally. For long-term stability, the following factors are essential: 🔹 soft tissue thickness; 🔹 width of keratinized tissue; 🔹 flap stability; 🔹 quality of graft fixation; 🔹 tension-free…
custom 52535423164418759232❤1🔥1
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @ohisworld. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“OHI-S World” (@ohisworld), 1,490 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ohisworld.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.