Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

OGU NEWS

@ogunews

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,633subscribers

+22 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003836713041
TypeChannel
Username@ogunews
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ogunews

Growth

3,6113,6333,6226 August 2026 — 3,611 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,616 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,628 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,633 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +22. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,608–3,636 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 12:253,633+5
9 Aug 2026, 20:583,628+12
7 Aug 2026, 03:023,616+5
6 Aug 2026, 06:033,611first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
68.5%
avg views ÷ 3,633 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,490
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.894%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held20 (9 July 20263 August 2026)
Views total47,300
Reactions total423
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

434 reactions across 20 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
12528.8%
🤣9622.1%
💩4510.4%
custom 5886501237515361841409.22%
🤯317.14%
custom 6003616873894123997204.61%
🔥163.69%
😱133.00%
💔122.76%
👀61.38%
custom 521095630695275891051.15%
😁51.15%
👍40.922%
👎40.922%
🆒30.691%
🐳30.691%
❤‍🔥20.461%
🎉20.461%
👏20.461%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 434reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3,847
across the posts below
Posts paid on
20
of 20 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
1,630
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ogunews. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 July 2026 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 22:11 UTC≈1,280 views66 reactions64 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

‼️ BREAKING: Staff Resignation Eviona (@eviona) has officially resigned from the OGU Staff Team. After dedicating countless hours to helping the community and resolving deal disputes, Eviona has decided to step down from the role. We thank Eviona for his service and wish him the very best in his future endeavors. ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ▶️ @OGUNews - @OGUsers 💧 Rainbet.com the #1 Non-KYC Crypto Casino & Sportsbook

28💔12custom 600361687389412399712🤣5😁5👎2👍1👏1

2 Aug 2026, 10:53 UTC≈1,730 views8 reactions31 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⚠️ JUST IN: Ex-Staff Member Banned @Mist (/Mist) has been banned on-site by default due to a failure to resolve a Deal Dispute. While it’s likely he will resolve this issue & appeal, he is leaving com, so you never know. Regardless, this shows a clear disregard for clients. This has been an ongoing issue with multiple notable users. Do you think he’ll appeal? ⬇️ ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ▶️ @OGUNews - @OGUsers 💧 Rainbet.com the #1

custom 521095630695275891053

2 Aug 2026, 01:16 UTC≈1,800 views29 reactions197 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

❓ Guess the Scammer - Round 4 (EXTREME DIFFICULTY) 2 legit users, 1 scammer, can you spot the scammer? Drop your guesses in the comments! ⬇️ ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ▶️ @OGUNews - @OGUsers 💧 Rainbet.com the #1 Non-KYC Crypto Casino & Sportsbook @rainbetcom

🤣20🔥4🆒31custom 60036168738941239971

1 Aug 2026, 02:02 UTC≈2,170 views2 reactions138 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📊 OGU Monthly Dispute Report — July 2026 📉 July 2026 • $26,016 reported lost • 97 disputes filed Compared to June, scam losses decreased by $39,281 and disputes increased by 10. Despite activity declining following June's spike, marketplace risks remain ongoing. ✔ Use trusted middlemen ❌ Avoid rushed deals ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ▶️ @OGUNews - @OGUsers 💧 Rainbet.com the #1 Non-KYC Crypto Casino & Sportsbook @rainbetcom

1🐳1

30 Jul 2026, 04:55 UTC≈2,710 views47 reactions101 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

❗️ UPDATE: @Beam has purchased @baem and permanently burned it. The NFT has been sent to an unrecoverable burn address, meaning it can never be owned or transferred again. This prevents anyone from using it to impersonate Beam in the future. ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ▶️ @OGUNews - @OGUsers 💧 Rainbet.com the #1 Non-KYC Crypto Casino & Sportsbook @rainbetcom

🤯2714🔥6

30 Jul 2026, 00:01 UTC≈2,600 views50 reactions161 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

❗️ UPDATE: @baem banned Telegram acted swiftly after reports of Beam's impersonator using the username "baem." The username has now been banned on Fragment & the user's Telegram account has been given the "FAKE" tag. ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ▶️ @OGUNews - @OGUsers 💧 Rainbet.com the #1 Non-KYC Crypto Casino & Sportsbook @rainbetcom

🤣27custom 5886501237515361841136🐳2👏1custom 60036168738941239971

29 Jul 2026, 12:02 UTC≈2,610 views38 reactions38 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

‼️ BREAKING: Dedicated Impersonator Be on the lookout when “Beam MM” DM’s you because it may be the newest impersonator, @baem. How to ensure you’re dealing with @Beam: • Confirm his username is @beam • Confirm his anonymous number is +888 0003 3000 • Confirm on-site While there have been many cases of fake MM buying a unique 4 letter to seem trustworthy, this is the first time someone has purchased a 4 letter th

custom 5886501237515361841276🔥3👎2

27 Jul 2026, 16:49 UTC≈2,570 views26 reactions17 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⚠️ JUST IN: Well Known Member loses $140,000 Coinflip Today, @heal (/heal) shared that he participated in a coinflip for $140,000, putting @yuck & @gentle on the line. Despite these assets not being valued anywhere near $140,000, the deal was, if heal won, the other party would purchase them for a sum of $140,000, and if he lost, the other party would receive the 2 assets for free, which is what ended up happening.

🤣177🤯2

25 Jul 2026, 03:43 UTC≈2,980 views74 reactions74 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⚠️ JUST IN: Attempted Account Sale The user @nagari (/wine) was caught attempting to sell his OGU and Telegram accounts for $3,000. A Deal Dispute was opened, and he has now been placed in DWC. His reasoning for the attempted sale was simply: “I’m leaving com.” Trying to quietly cash out did not go according to plan. Either way, quite a pathetic situation to be caught in. How much would you sell your OGU account f

💩45🤣272

22 Jul 2026, 17:32 UTC≈2,570 views1 reactions128 Starsread 7 August 2026

❗️ UPDATE: Comchat has been unbanned. The situation is fully resolved. Do you think this is related to the troubles OGU has been having over the past week? ⬇️ ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ▶️ @OGUNews - @OGUsers 💧 Rainbet.com the #1 Non-KYC Crypto Casino & Sportsbook @rainbetcom

🤯1

22 Jul 2026, 16:15 UTC≈2,450 views3 reactions45 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

‼️ BREAKING: Comchat Banned The community chat run by Trusted members @nine (/9), @cold (/cold) & @fame (/fame) has been banned for violating Telegram's Terms of Service. 9 managed to reinstate it for a couple of minutes, but it has gone back to being banned. He is currently working on getting this resolved. ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ▶️ @OGUNews - @OGUsers 💧 Rainbet.com the #1 Non-KYC Crypto Casino & Sportsbook @rainbetcom

😱21

21 Jul 2026, 22:37 UTC≈2,380 views7 reactions26 Starsread 7 August 2026

❗️ UPDATE: OGUser.com is no longer affected by Cloudflare's warning for potential brand or service misrepresentation. EDIT: It has reappeared. Working on a solution. ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ▶️ @OGUNews - @OGUsers 💧 Rainbet.com the #1 Non-KYC Crypto Casino & Sportsbook @rainbetcom

6🤯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ogunews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 118,727 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“OGU NEWS” (@ogunews), 3,633 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ogunews.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.