4 measurements spanning 14 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 172–173 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
21 Aug 2026, 20:18
172
-1
15 Aug 2026, 17:17
173
+1
8 Aug 2026, 14:46
172
no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:50
172
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 7 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
345 reactions across 20 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
117
33.9%
❤
60
17.4%
💯
28
8.12%
🤣
24
6.96%
🔥
22
6.38%
😁
22
6.38%
🥴
18
5.22%
🤔
16
4.64%
😱
13
3.77%
👀
6
1.74%
🤩
5
1.45%
🤬
3
0.87%
⚡
2
0.58%
👏
2
0.58%
🤝
2
0.58%
🥱
2
0.58%
😡
1
0.29%
🤨
1
0.29%
🥰
1
0.29%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 345reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2025 to 4 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
19
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 20 we hold a reading for · 50%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @oglynisy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 June 2025 to 4 October 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Гитлер неожиданно демонстрирует искреннюю эмпатию к человечеству и направляет свою чудовищную, разрушительную энергию в обратную сторону. Сторону прогресса и созидания.
Германия делает гигантский экономический рывок. Блестяще развивается медицина . Неплохо разбирающаяся в технических механизмах нация так-же находит и укрощает механизмы старения.
И вот уже осенью 2025 года, на ежегодном партийном съезде в Нюр…
Конечно же, по хорошему - рабочего с колхозницей можно было бы немного приодеть.
А вместо острых и тяжёлых предметов дать в руки книгу и скрипку.
Но разве тогда это будет выглядеть дико?
И кого, скажите к черту, таким напугаешь?
В те годы, за три колоска собранные на колхозном поле, без раздумий давали десяточку лагерей.
А тут... целый срыв промышленно-финансового плана!
Что к чертям происходит? Что за махровый гуманизм?
1930 год.
Оказывается, колумбийская полиция в 1993 году застрелила двойника наркобарона.
Сам же Пабло Эскобар успешно сделал пластическую операцию и теперь под именем Мадуро управляет наркокартелем Венесуэла.
Через миллион лет живущее на Земле высокоразвитое общество Эволюционировавших Тараканов будет отзываться о человеческой эпохе как о печальной, но судьбоносной - самоуничтожение людей в ядерной войне дало блестящий шанс их виду на колоссальное развитие и дальнейшее освоение всей галактики!
Фото Валерия Щеколдина.
Статистика душевнобольных в СССР велась, но не разглашалась.
Настоящие цифры умопомрачения населения наверное бы ужаснули многих.
Головой о стену бились как сапожник Федор так и Иван Иванович из Политбюро. Даже секретари ЦК, эти наместники Ленина на земле - они тоже, случалось, поступали наперекор разуму.
Свой процент к показателям добавляла карательная психиатрия - в чистом виде коммун…
Мэри Энн Коттон.
Черная вдова. 🧪
Серийная убийца XIX века, питавшая страсть к отравлениям.
За двадцать лет при помощи мышьяка она умертвила изрядное количество народа, в том числе мать и 11 собственных детей.
Медленное угасание родных приводило ее в неописуемый восторг.
Уметь радоваться подобному злодеянию может лишь тот, кто сам изначально вытравил из себя все человеческое - до самой последней молекулы...
Бог огня Шиутекутли.
Сперва индейские жрецы опаивали будущих жертв отваром из каннабиса. Следом, уже сами, принимали коктейль из галлюциногенных грибов и психотропных кактусов.
А затем. А затем - разжигали костры...
Согласно ритуалу, громкие песнопения, воинственные кличи и дикие танцы прерывались в тот момент, когда жертвы надлежало бросать в огонь. Кто выскакивал - швыряли обратно - для культа важна была определ…
❤10🔥9👀6😱2⚡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @oglynisy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Оглянись!” (@oglynisy), 172 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oglynisy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.