Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for گرین لند | کنکور انسانی

Channel

گرین لند | کنکور انسانی

@ogisho

Not marked by Telegram, checked 15 August 2026

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,591subscribers

-100 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002223021848
TypeChannel
Username@ogisho
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 October 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/ogisho

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,5912,9252,75813 August 2026 — 2,691 subscribers15 August 2026 — 2,736 subscribers18 August 2026 — 2,870 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,925 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,743 subscribers26 August 2026 — 2,744 subscribers29 August 2026 — 2,733 subscribers1 September 2026 — 2,727 subscribers5 September 2026 — 2,730 subscribers10 September 2026 — 2,747 subscribers14 September 2026 — 2,751 subscribers18 September 2026 — 2,737 subscribers29 September 2026 — 2,669 subscribers6 October 2026 — 2,622 subscribers12 October 2026 — 2,591 subscribers13 August 202612 October 2026
15 measurements spanning 60 days, net -100. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,541–2,975 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Oct 2026, 14:482,591-31
6 Oct 2026, 06:022,622-47
29 Sept 2026, 09:022,669-68
18 Sept 2026, 23:422,737-14
14 Sept 2026, 06:552,751+4
10 Sept 2026, 13:182,747+17
5 Sept 2026, 03:582,730+3
1 Sept 2026, 15:072,727-6
29 Aug 2026, 13:382,733-11
26 Aug 2026, 18:272,744+1
24 Aug 2026, 05:042,743-182
20 Aug 2026, 18:182,925+55
18 Aug 2026, 04:022,870+134
15 Aug 2026, 00:132,736+45
13 Aug 2026, 20:022,691first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

125 reactions across 20 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤8265.6%
😎1310.4%
👏64.80%
🐳54.00%
🔥43.20%
🕊32.40%
😭32.40%
👌21.60%
👨‍💻21.60%
👍10.8%
👎10.8%
🙏10.8%
🥰10.8%
🫡10.8%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 125 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 19:51 UTC11 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🐳1🔥1🥰1

Signed Elnaz Kanani

13 Aug 2026, 19:27 UTC24 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

‎ همه رو درست جواب دادم😎😎 تشویقم کنید😎😂😂

👏6❤1

Signed S

13 Aug 2026, 18:30 UTC35 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Voice message

توضیح پاسخ سوالات تستی زبان🌱

❤5🕊1

Signed Elnaz Kanani

13 Aug 2026, 16:50 UTC57 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

امروز با Future Tense بریم سراغ آینده!🔮 Will یا Be going to؟ ببینیم هرکدوم کِی و کجا استفاده میشن 👀 🌱@ogisho

❤5🐳1

Signed Elnaz Kanani

13 Aug 2026, 16:36 UTC57 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Poll

4. We _ _ _ this movie two days ago.

  1. A) have watched17%
  2. B) watch33%
  3. C) watched33%
  4. D) have been watching17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤5🫡1

Signed Elnaz Kanani

13 Aug 2026, 16:36 UTC55 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Poll

3. _ _ _ _ you ever _ _ _ sushi? 🍣

  1. A) Did / eat42%
  2. B) Have / eaten25%
  3. C) Do / eat17%
  4. D) Were / eating17%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👌2😎2

Signed Elnaz Kanani

13 Aug 2026, 16:36 UTC53 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Poll

2. Sara _ _ _ _ to London last year.

  1. A) has gone17%
  2. B) goes17%
  3. C) went50%
  4. D) has been17%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👨‍💻2😎2

Signed Elnaz Kanani

13 Aug 2026, 16:36 UTC45 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Poll

1. I _ _ _ _ _my homework, so I can go out now.

  1. A) finished38%
  2. B) have finished38%
  3. C) finish15%
  4. D) was finishing8%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🐳2😎2

Signed Elnaz Kanani

13 Aug 2026, 16:35 UTC42 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026

درود به کنکوری‌های عزیز 🌱 بیاید با هم نکاتی که تا الان درباره‌ی Present Perfect (حال کامل) و Simple Past (گذشته ساده) گفتیم رو یک مرور کوتاه داشته باشیم. از این به بعد قراره کم‌کم بریم سراغ نکات پایه و مهم زبان انگلیسی؛ چون برای اینکه بتونید توی درس زبان نمره‌ی خوبی بگیرید، داشتن یک پایه‌ی قوی خیلی مهمه. پس قدم‌به‌قدم با هم پیش میریم و هر جلسه نکات جلسه قبل رو با چند تا تست مرور میکنیم📚✨

❤5🕊1

Signed Elnaz Kanani

13 Aug 2026, 14:32 UTC53 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

تو هم این روزا بیشتر خودتو با بقیه مقایسه میکنی؟😭 🌱@ogisho

❤5🕊1😭1

Signed Elnaz Kanani

13 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC53 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Voice message

مقایسه خودمون با دیگران🥲 00:34 ❌️مقایسه، وسیله قضاوت 03:19 ✅️مقایسه، منبع اطلاعات 05:28 🔍 معیار اصلی، خود قبلیه 06:47 😕چرا نزدیک کنکور مقایسه بیشتر میشه و چیکار کنیم؟ •الناز کنعانی| رتبه 279 و مشاور مدرسه 🌱@ogisho

❤6🐳1

Signed Elnaz Kanani

13 Aug 2026, 11:40 UTC65 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🌻ترتیب پاسخگویی به درس ها در کنکور 🌱@ogisho

❤6🔥1

Signed Elnaz

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ogisho. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 8 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

13 Aug 2026, 16:36 UTCAnonymous Quiz12 voters

4. We _ _ _ this movie two days ago.

  1. A) have watched17%
  2. B) watch33%
  3. C) watched33%
  4. D) have been watching17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

13 Aug 2026, 16:36 UTCAnonymous Quiz12 voters

3. _ _ _ _ you ever _ _ _ sushi? 🍣

  1. A) Did / eat42%
  2. B) Have / eaten25%
  3. C) Do / eat17%
  4. D) Were / eating17%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

13 Aug 2026, 16:36 UTCAnonymous Quiz12 voters

2. Sara _ _ _ _ to London last year.

  1. A) has gone17%
  2. B) goes17%
  3. C) went50%
  4. D) has been17%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

13 Aug 2026, 16:36 UTCAnonymous Quiz13 voters

1. I _ _ _ _ _my homework, so I can go out now.

  1. A) finished38%
  2. B) have finished38%
  3. C) finish15%
  4. D) was finishing8%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

13 Aug 2026, 08:58 UTCAnonymous Quiz19 voters

اگر یک تولید کننده بین دو محصول A و B مجبور به انتخاب باشد و با انتخاب تولید محصول B ، از سود خالص ۱۲ میلیون تومانی محصول A چشم پوشی کند،این رقم بیانگر چیست؟

  1. ارزش هزینه فرصت انتخاب63%
  2. سود حسابداری نهایی شرکت5%
  3. هرینه هدر رفته تولید16%
  4. هزینه صریح یا پولی تولید16%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

13 Aug 2026, 08:58 UTCAnonymous Quiz22 voters

کدام مورد نمونه ای از اشتباه "اعتماد به نفس بیش از حد" در تصمیم گیری اقتصادی است؟

  1. نگهداری پول در بانک به جای خرید ملک به دلیل ترس از کاهش قیمت ها.9%
  2. ترک تحصیل برای ورود سریع به بازار کار و کسب درامد ناچیز فعلی.14%
  3. خرید یک لباس گران قیمت صرفا به دلیل اینکه در حراج ۵۰ درصدی قرار دارد.9%
  4. سرمایه گذاری در بورس بدون داشتن دانش کافی و تنها با اتکا به حدس فردی.68%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 August 2026 to 13 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

پرسش و پاسخ | اسپارت
@spart_question · 19,211
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 4 October 2026
📚 بانک جزوه و کتاب کنکوری 📚
@konkor1403i · 209,652
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 14 August 2026
مشاوره کنکور | اسپارت
@spart_counseling · 23,615
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 19 September 2026
مشاوره کنکور هیستامین
@hiskonkor_moshavereh · 24,901
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 15 September 2026
زیست حنیف عظیمی 1406
@mirhosseeinii · 62,290
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 21 August 2026
کلاس کنکور و نهایی | اسپارت
@spart_class · 71,937
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“گرین لند | کنکور انسانی” (@ogisho), 2,591 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ogisho.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.