Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Маша Стрельцова | Математика ОГЭ | Сотка

@ogemath100

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,723subscribers

-72 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001244240114
TypeChannel
Username@ogemath100
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ogemath100

Growth

8,7238,7958,7597 August 2026 — 8,795 subscribers8 August 2026 — 8,777 subscribers11 August 2026 — 8,760 subscribers14 August 2026 — 8,723 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -72. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,712–8,806 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 09:288,723-37
11 Aug 2026, 00:128,760-17
8 Aug 2026, 01:018,777-18
7 Aug 2026, 15:168,795first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 2 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.1%
avg views ÷ 8,723 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,490
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.58%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held18 (2 June 20267 August 2026)
Views total2,980
Reactions total77
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,544 reactions across 18 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,14974.4%
1248.03%
💘996.41%
🔥704.53%
❤‍🔥503.24%
👎150.972%
🤣130.842%
😁50.324%
🤓50.324%
🫡40.259%
💯30.194%
🥰30.194%
👍20.13%
😇20.13%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,544reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 2 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 14:43 UTC≈1,780 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Да, до начала учебного года ещё пара-тройка недель, но мы не можем дождаться встречи с вами, поэтому ✨ решили провести ПЕРВЫЙ в истории (для нас) «СОТКА ФЕСТ» ✨ Уже в это воскресенье, 9 августа, в Москве в 16:00 собираются самые продвинутые школьники столицы и Подмосковья — на секретной локации, где будет: 🍕 пицца, 🎁 призы, 🎡 колесо фортуны, 🎵 музыка, ⚽️ футбольчик и... ⭐секретный звездный гость — Д.....н!⭐ / пофо

13💘2

29 Jul 2026, 16:52 UTC≈1,200 views62 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Давненько меня не было, возвращаюсь ⭐️ Как проводите лето?

44💘15🥰3

10 Jul 2026, 13:52 UTC≈2,290 views36 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Вопрос 5

  1. 2412%
  2. 64815%
  3. 7271%
  4. 82%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

29👎5💘2

10 Jul 2026, 13:50 UTC≈1,780 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Вопрос 4

  1. 87%
  2. 6475%
  3. 3418%
  4. 41%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19👎2

10 Jul 2026, 13:48 UTC≈1,520 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Вопрос 3

  1. 22,519%
  2. 75,564%
  3. 48,510%
  4. 626%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16👎2

10 Jul 2026, 13:46 UTC≈1,390 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Вопрос 2

  1. 101%
  2. 309%
  3. 254%
  4. 1185%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

17👎3

10 Jul 2026, 13:44 UTC≈1,320 views26 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Внезапный тест. Вопрос 1

  1. 183%
  2. 147%
  3. 1286%
  4. 85%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

23👎3

7 Jul 2026, 14:57 UTC≈1,570 views60 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Кстати, еще не показывала вам свои результаты ЕГЭ этого года 🥰

41🔥13❤‍🔥6

7 Jul 2026, 14:17 UTC≈1,660 views70 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Всем привет! Сегодня на летней продленке играли в "Правду или ложь", поэтому давайте еще немного попрактикуемся 😈 Какое утверждение верно? ❤️ — Смежные углы всегда равны. 🤓 — Если стороны одного четырёхугольника соответственно равны сторонам другого четырёхугольника, то такие четырёхугольники равны. ⚡️ — Биссектриса равнобедренного треугольника, проведенная из вершины, противолежащей основанию, делит основание на дв

61🤓54

2 Jul 2026, 09:12 UTC≈2,290 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Всем привет! Сегодня старт летней продленки, представляете? 🥰 За лето вы сможете мощно поднять баллы и освоить базу перед учебным годом, поэтому обязательно приходите. Доступ к платформе можно получить здесь Ну а сегодня в 12:30 по мск жду вас на первый онлайн, будем обсуждать печки ✨

27❤‍🔥1

22 Jun 2026, 15:35 UTC≈2,240 views36 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @sotkaonlinePhoto

Кидаем реальный кэш на карту за твою честную историю подготовки в Сотке🔥 Мы знаем, как вам сейчас волнительно… хотим быть рядом, поэтому устраиваем масштабный челлендж 🤝 Если ты учился с нами, заходи на платформу, нажимай кнопку «Забрать подарок», читай условия, заполняй форму и жди 🙌🏻 Наша команда с тобой свяжется 🫂 Пиши в комменты 🔥 - результаты пришли, уже готовлюсь к поступлению в вуз ❤️ - еще жду некоторое п

23🔥12🫡1

16 Jun 2026, 15:34 UTC≈3,130 views422 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Поздравляю многих из вас с началом отдыха после экзаменов 🥰 Кстати, результаты по математике все получили? ❤️ — я уже знаю свою оценку ⚡️ — еще жду

38438

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ogemath100. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Jul 2026, 13:52 UTCAnonymous Quiz351 voters

Вопрос 5

  1. 2412%
  2. 64815%
  3. 7271%
  4. 82%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10 Jul 2026, 13:50 UTCAnonymous Quiz279 voters

Вопрос 4

  1. 87%
  2. 6475%
  3. 3418%
  4. 41%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10 Jul 2026, 13:48 UTCAnonymous Quiz272 voters

Вопрос 3

  1. 22,519%
  2. 75,564%
  3. 48,510%
  4. 626%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10 Jul 2026, 13:46 UTCAnonymous Quiz336 voters

Вопрос 2

  1. 101%
  2. 309%
  3. 254%
  4. 1185%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10 Jul 2026, 13:44 UTCAnonymous Quiz360 voters

Внезапный тест. Вопрос 1

  1. 183%
  2. 147%
  3. 1286%
  4. 85%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 2 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 201,005 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Данир на связи | Математика ОГЭ 2027 | Умскул
@danirmath · 322,425
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 August 2026
Настя Гласная | Русский язык ОГЭ 2027 Умскул | Территория русского языка
@nastya_umschool_russ · 283,487
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 10 August 2026
Равиль Кандинский | Обществознание ОГЭ | Умскул
@ravilcandi · 130,022
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Маша Стрельцова | Математика ОГЭ | Сотка” (@ogemath100), 8,723 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ogemath100.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.