Channel
@ofmempirevipreviews
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,727subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001911155956 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ofmempirevipreviews |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ofmempirevipreviews |
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 15:58 | 1,727 | -2 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 22:20 | 1,729 | -2 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 05:20 | 1,731 | -3 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 17:54 | 1,734 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:36 | 1,735 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 09:53 | 1,736 | +1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:03 | 1,735 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 03:38 | 1,736 | +5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:22 | 1,731 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:30 | 1,732 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:02 | 1,732 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 17 May 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
29 reactions across 8 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 20 | 69.0% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 17.2% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 13.8% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 17 May 2024 to 1 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⚡️ 50% OFF LIMITED TIME CYBER MONDAY SALE ON ALL PRODUCTS 🌐 OFMPro.com - Deeplinks. Landing Pages and Direct links. Account fleet tracking. Creator content requests. Viral trend & content dashboard. Creator watchlists. 💼 OFMJobs.com - Largest Online Hiring Platform for the OFM Industry. Over 1,000,000 Job Applications to date. 💸 whop.com/ofmempire - VIP Group. Weekly Group Calls. 1 on 1 calls. Launchpad starter co…
❤3
Some more reviews on the Build With Me Series. Group members are loving it and finding value seeing the bare bones step by step live process of building an agency. More info on the series here: https://t.me/ofmempirevip/353 Find all call recordings within the OFMEVIP group, and tune in to the weekly calls: whop.com/ofmempire
❤4
A great review on the Build With Me Series. More info on the series here: https://t.me/ofmempirevip/353 Find all call recordings within the OFMEVIP group, and tune in to the weekly calls: whop.com/ofmempire
❤2
@ofmempirevip is - in my opinion - the best group for agencies to be inside of - regardless of revenue. Most groups are unserious, with the main goal to be a troll or joke page with the odd piece of advice littered around the trash. I've found VIP to be a more mature forum where actual discussions happen and the feedback from the coaches keeps things on the right track and the most important goal remains on everyone'…
❤2
We have a ton of these reviews on the group. Here's some more just from the past two months. ⚡️ Join here: whop.com/ofmempire ⚡️ Use the code 2025 for 25% off!
❤2👍2🔥2
Ridiculous value in the OFM Empire group. Weekly calls drop loads of gold, and this group is the sole reason my agency is getting off the ground. 1000% recommend for agency owners at all levels!
❤2
Really appreciate this last call, so much value from btz and patience answering all questions! Really appreciate
BTZ's group is a game-changer, especially once you hit the numbers to get into the Warlord group. The info is gold and the connections there are next level! Seriously multiplied our agency's profits 📈
Some reviews left on VIP chat after I (@BTZofm) led a call last week on the recent instagram changes, threads traffic, SFS traffic, hiring, and more. The recording is posted in the VIP group for everyone to watch. Watch it here: 📈 whop.com/btz 📈
❤1👍1
✅ An amazing review by two people left on group chat for the IG call that I (BTZ) led on the VIP group. The recording is posted in the VIP group for everyone to watch. Watch it here: 📈 whop.com/btz 📈 📈 We have a 50% off sale for the next 24 hours. Use the code AUTOMATE before it runs out. 📈 whop.com/btz 📈
❤4🔥3👍1
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @ofmempirevipreviews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“OFM Empire VIP Reviews” (@ofmempirevipreviews), 1,727 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ofmempirevipreviews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.