Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

OFFSTAGE MLBB

@offstage_mlbb

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,995subscribers

-14 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002486039545
TypeChannel
Username@offstage_mlbb
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/offstage_mlbb

Growth

2,9953,0093,0026 August 2026 — 3,009 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,006 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,995 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,993–3,011 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 11:212,995-11
7 Aug 2026, 21:213,006-3
6 Aug 2026, 22:023,009first reading

Engagement

33 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.5%
avg views ÷ 2,995 subscribers
Avg views / post
465
33 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.60%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
33
of 33 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 32 of 33 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held33 (5 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total15,358
Reactions total241
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 00:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

241 reactions across 32 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6024.9%
👍5522.8%
🤯4719.5%
🔥3313.7%
💊2510.4%
😭145.81%
😁52.07%
👎20.83%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 241reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 18:54 UTC230 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

⚡ Caloy, Owl и Nosia покинули состав Twisted Minds PH Голдеры Owl с Nosia и роумер Caloy прекратили сотрудничество с филиппинским ростером Twisted Minds и стали свободными агентами. Читать подробнее | Подписаться

👍3

7 Aug 2026, 18:19 UTC270 viewsread 8 August 2026

Превью Queen Legends Season 4 8 августа начинаются встречи Queen Legends Season 4. Формат турнира, составы команд и распределение призового фонда — в нашем материале. Читать подробнее | Подписаться

7 Aug 2026, 17:26 UTC303 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Shogun обсудил победу над PRO Esports на Играх будущего 2026 «Иногда приходилось импровизировать, но таких моментов было не так много», — рассказал эксплейнер Bigetron by Vitality. Читать подробнее | Подписаться

😁1

7 Aug 2026, 16:59 UTC325 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Итоги второго дня плей-офф Игр будущего 2026 ONIC, Selangor Red Giants и Aurora Gaming прошли в полуфинал Games of the Future 2026, а Team Falcons PH c FUT Esports покинули турнир. Читать подробнее | Подписаться

🔥2

7 Aug 2026, 16:56 UTC326 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

⚡ PRO Esports покинула Игры будущего 2026 Коллектив PRO Esports проиграл встречу с Bigetron by Vitality в четвертьфинале плей-офф Games of the Future 2026 и вылетел с соревнования в Астане. Читать подробнее | Подписаться

👍1🔥1

7 Aug 2026, 16:35 UTC409 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Wizer вспомнил доходы игроков в составе Deus Vult «Я получал... Короче, мог получать на тот момент до трёх с половиной тысяч долларов в месяц», — поделился контент-мейкер. Читать подробнее | Подписаться

🤯5

7 Aug 2026, 15:11 UTC383 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Pagu высказался о победе над Team Falcons PH на Играх будущего 2026 «Это был напряжённый и изнурительный матч, поэтому я очень рад, что присутствую здесь как победитель, а не проигравший», — признался роумер Aurora Gaming. Читать подробнее | Подписаться

👍42

7 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC407 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

❗ Обновление тестового сервера MLBB от 07.08.2026 В новом патче для тестового сервера Mobile Legends: Bang Bang MOONTON Games ослабила Лукаса с Хаябусой и усилила урон двойников Сана. Читать подробнее | Подписаться

🔥3👍1

7 Aug 2026, 14:35 UTC408 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Team Falcons PH вылетела с Игр будущего 2026 Team Falcons PH потерпела поражение от Aurora Gaming в четвертьфинале плей-офф Games of the Future 2026 и покинула турнир. Читать подробнее | Подписаться

👍2🤯2

7 Aug 2026, 13:40 UTC437 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

⚡️ INVISION подписала часть бывшего ростера magic Игроки Solist, Nagib, adrenaline, shelianer, shvedskii с тренером denaliens начали сотрудничать с новым клубом INVISION. Читать подробнее | Подписаться

8👍3

7 Aug 2026, 12:04 UTC443 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

⚡ DianFengYaoGuai покинула Игры будущего 2026 DianFengYaoGuai уступила ONIC в четвертьфинале плей-офф Games of the Future 2026 по Mobile Legends: Bang Bang. Читать подробнее | Подписаться

😭42🤯1

7 Aug 2026, 11:42 UTC453 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

MOONTON Games обновила систему приглашений на MLBB Mid Season Cup Действующий чемпион MSC теперь будет получать гарантированный инвайт в групповой этап следующего турнира серии, а финалист — в Wildcard-стадию. Читать подробнее | Подписаться

10👍2🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @offstage_mlbb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 208,334 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“OFFSTAGE MLBB” (@offstage_mlbb), 2,995 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/offstage_mlbb.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.