๐ข๐ณ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ฒ๐ฐ | ๐ข๐ฆ๐๐ฃ | ๐ข๐ฆ๐ช๐ฃ | ๐ข๐ฆ๐๐ฃ | ๐ข๐ฆ๐๐ | ๐ข๐ฆ๐๐ | ๐ข๐ฆ๐ช๐ | ๐ข๐ฆ๐๐ | ๐ข๐ฆ๐ช๐ โข pinned Deleted message

Channel
๐ข๐ณ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ฒ๐ฐ | ๐ข๐ฆ๐๐ฃ | ๐ข๐ฆ๐ช๐ฃ | ๐ข๐ฆ๐๐ฃ | ๐ข๐ฆ๐๐ | ๐ข๐ฆ๐๐ | ๐ข๐ฆ๐ช๐ | ๐ข๐ฆ๐๐ | ๐ข๐ฆ๐ช๐ โข
@offsec_exams
On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Stars ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry
8,461subscribers
+63 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 3,162โ10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002528993646 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @offsec_exams |
| Description | Offsec all exams |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/offsec_exams |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:52 | 8,461 | +59 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:05 | 8,402 | +4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:18 | 8,398 | first reading |
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 31 October 2025 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR ยท 30 days
- 21.2%
- avg views รท 8,461 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,800
- 10 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.245%
- reactions รท views ยท ER floor
- Posts in window
- 11
- of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (31 October 2025 โ 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 17,950 |
| Reactions total | 44 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 16:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 59
- Videos
- 1
- Links
- 69
Lifetime counters from Telegramโs own channel header, read 12 August 2026 โ not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramโs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 15s
- Average length
- 15s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
Reaction mix
116 reactions across 17 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| โค | 57 | 49.1% | |
| โก | 18 | 15.5% | |
| ๐ฅ | 11 | 9.48% | |
| โคโ๐ฅ | 8 | 6.90% | |
| ๐ฅฐ | 5 | 4.31% | |
| ๐ | 4 | 3.45% | |
| ๐ | 4 | 3.45% | |
| ๐ | 4 | 3.45% | |
| ๐ | 2 | 1.72% | |
| ๐ | 1 | 0.862% | |
| ๐ฟ | 1 | 0.862% | |
| ๐ | 1 | 0.862% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 116reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 31 October 2025 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 17 we hold a reading for ยท 6%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ bought with money โ on a post by @offsec_exams. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 October 2025 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
[OSCP+] Crestline Standalone Pwned! โ this was the Latest OSCP+ standalone pending Pwned this one also now we have all the new OSCP+ standalones available cheers! ๐ก Welcome to Red Block Team ๐ ๐ฉ Use Our Free Cheat - Sheets for your Offsec and Other Exam Preparations. For OffSec Exams Always Trust an Experienced Professional! โ ๐ค๐ค๐ค๐ค๐ค๐ค๐ค๐ค
โค3
OSTH Exam - Guided By RedBlock ๐ Cheat - sheet Red Block Services Proofs Discussion All Channels
โค2
OSEP Exam - Guided By RedBlock ๐ Cheat - sheet Red Block Services Proofs Discussion All Channels
โค4
OSCP+ Active Directory Network Walkthrough (expired)
๐ฅ4๐2โค1๐ฟ1
KLCP Exam - Guided By RedBlock ๐ Cheat - sheet Red Block Services Proofs Discussion All Channels
โค3
OSWP Exam - Guided By RedBlock ๐ Cheat - sheet Red Block Services Proofs Discussion All Channels
โค3โคโ๐ฅ1
OSDA Exam - Guided By RedBlock ๐ Cheat - sheet Red Block Services Proofs Discussion All Channels
โค3โคโ๐ฅ1
๐ค๐ค๐ค๐ค๐ค๐ค๐ค๐ค
โคโ๐ฅ2โค1
Photo, posted without a caption
โค2โคโ๐ฅ2๐1
Offsec $250 discount https://portal.offsec.com/checkout/?view=cc
๐2๐2๐ฅฐ2โก1๐1
OSCP+ New Exam Lab >> Standalone With Ports - 22, 43, 80, 110, 143 Available! XXX.XX.XXX.110 IP Available! @redblock_team ๐ ๐ค๐ค๐ค๐ค๐ค๐ค๐ค๐ค
โค3
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @offsec_exams. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank โ 446,362 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@altered_security ยท 7,5933 posts๐ฃ๐ผ๐ฟ๐๐ฆ๐๐ถ๐ด๐ด๐ฒ๐ฟ | ๐๐ฆ๐๐ฃ โข
@burpsuite_exams ยท 7,4273 posts๐๐๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ช๐ฎ๐ฟ๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐๐ฎ๐ฏ๐ | ๐๐ฅ๐ง๐ | ๐๐ฅ๐ง๐ฆ ๐ฉ๐ฎ | ๐ช๐๐-๐ฅ๐ง๐ | ๐๐ฃ๐-๐ฅ๐ง๐ โข
@cyberwarfare_exams ยท 7,5383 posts๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฆ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ข๐ฝ๐ ๐๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐ฝ | ๐๐๐ฃ๐ฒ๐ป๐ซ-๐๐ช๐ฆ | ๐-๐๐๐ฃ๐ฒ๐ป๐ซ | ๐๐๐ง๐ฒ๐ฎ๐บ๐ฒ๐ฟ โข
@secops_exams ยท 7,3393 posts๐ง๐ฟ๐๐๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ธ๐ ๐ฒ | ๐ฆ๐๐๐ญ | ๐ฃ๐ง๐ญ | ๐ฆ๐๐๐ญ โข
@tryhackme_exams ยท 7,5123 posts๐ญ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ผ ๐ฃ๐ผ๐ถ๐ป๐ ๐ฆ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐ | ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ง๐ฒ๐ฎ๐บ ๐ข๐ฝ๐ | ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ง๐ฒ๐ฎ๐บ ๐ข๐ฝ๐ ๐ฎ | ๐๐ฅ๐ง๐ข | ๐๐ฅ๐ง๐ โข
@zeropoint_security ยท 7,6663 posts
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐ข๐ณ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ฒ๐ฐ | ๐ข๐ฆ๐๐ฃ | ๐ข๐ฆ๐ช๐ฃ | ๐ข๐ฆ๐๐ฃ | ๐ข๐ฆ๐๐ | ๐ข๐ฆ๐๐ | ๐ข๐ฆ๐ช๐ | ๐ข๐ฆ๐๐ | ๐ข๐ฆ๐ช๐ โขโ (@offsec_exams), 8,461 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/offsec_exams.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.