Voice message, posted without a caption
β€155π4π₯3

Channel
@officialgumiho
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Posts edited after publishing Β· Posts recorded as deleted Β· Cite this entry
60,094subscribers
-1,349 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 31,623β100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001735888671 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @officialgumiho |
| Description | Follow me here for all the latest updates and secret gumi intel π₯°β€οΈ |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 62 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/officialgumiho |
Gaming β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Nov 2026, 03:49 | 60,094 | -29 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 21:20 | 60,123 | +12 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 21:26 | 60,111 | +42 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 17:58 | 60,069 | -30 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 19:39 | 60,099 | -58 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 21:16 | 60,157 | -17 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 18:10 | 60,174 | -17 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 21:46 | 60,191 | -9 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 20:28 | 60,200 | +9 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 22:31 | 60,191 | +21 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 20:10 | 60,170 | +83 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 21:19 | 60,087 | +276 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 22:30 | 59,811 | +432 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 23:21 | 59,379 | +3 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 22:16 | 59,376 | +24 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 01:21 | 59,352 | -37 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 22:28 | 59,389 | -30 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 21:39 | 59,419 | -10 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 19:59 | 59,429 | -26 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 14:29 | 59,455 | first reading |
33 posts held, back to 30 June 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 192 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 4 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 33 (30 June 2026 β 4 November 2026) |
| Views total | 89,710 |
| Reactions total | 4,267 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Nov 2026, 12:43 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 9 November 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramβs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
31,904 reactions across 33 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 17,848 | 55.9% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 7,156 | 22.4% | |
| π₯ | 5,556 | 17.4% | |
| π€© | 795 | 2.49% | |
| π | 384 | 1.20% | |
| π | 93 | 0.291% | |
| π | 72 | 0.226% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 31,904 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegramβs own βeditedβ marker: 0 of 6 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before β this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Voice message, posted without a caption
β€155π4π₯3
Can we talk about how amazing my Aloy cosplay shoot turned out?? And YES there is a second version (and videos) of course π you know where π
β€405π₯116β€βπ₯86π€©20π4π2
Voice message, posted without a caption
β€197β€βπ₯55π₯34π11
clowning around β€οΈπ©΅ β¦this clown girl is up to no good π find out for yourself next Friday π (full length video)
β€647β€βπ₯223π₯174π€©24π8π4π1
tomorrow π€
β€619π₯288β€βπ₯190π€©18π13
Are you lost, wanderer? I can guide you π¦π
β€549β€βπ₯233π₯143π21π€©16π3π1
this set with artyfakes drops in a few hours πͺ½β¨ who knew angels could get soβ¦ π€« (with video proof)
β€502π₯242β€βπ₯183π€©33π9π3π1
meet the mushroom witch, my new OC π¦ππΏ thereβs also a second outfit version that Iβll show you on OF later this month π
β€579β€βπ₯245π₯117π18π€©17π3π1
looking for my jolly bold sailor
β€700π₯293β€βπ₯215π€©46π7π5π2
Painting fun on my new walls π¦ I plan to celebrate my move in a rather UNIQUE way on 2nd October ππ Join here β¬οΈπ€« https://clickmy.social/gumihohannyaig
β€416β€βπ₯139π₯92π€©23π7π2
some of my favs pics Iβve taken this year π (well, from the ones I can post π€£)
β€563β€βπ₯236π₯156π€©33π8π5
itβs OFFICIAL, Iβm moving 1st October and Iβm preparing an event on 2nd October on OF to celebrate the move π₯³ Will you join the celebrations π ? I plan to mark the date in a rather UNIQUE way ππ Join here β¬οΈπ€« https://clickmy.social/gumihohannyaig
β€510β€βπ₯202π₯127π€©26π10π4π2
Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @officialgumiho. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@officialgumiho edited 1 post after it first published β the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too β this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 2 posts on @officialgumiho as deleted β posts this register held that were missing from the channelβs public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channelβs public page, and when β not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βgumi's cuzy crewππ¦π¦πβ (@officialgumiho), 60,094 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/officialgumiho.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.