Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
61 measurements spanning 91 days, net -2,681. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 36,367–39,852 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 07:26
36,769
-29
5 Nov 2026, 06:57
36,798
-29
4 Nov 2026, 06:07
36,827
-24
3 Nov 2026, 07:50
36,851
-26
2 Nov 2026, 05:50
36,877
-12
1 Nov 2026, 05:20
36,889
-24
31 Oct 2026, 08:31
36,913
-21
30 Oct 2026, 06:09
36,934
-4
29 Oct 2026, 09:09
36,938
-16
28 Oct 2026, 09:21
36,954
-26
27 Oct 2026, 08:08
36,980
-21
26 Oct 2026, 05:26
37,001
-22
25 Oct 2026, 04:45
37,023
-15
24 Oct 2026, 04:07
37,038
-4
23 Oct 2026, 06:05
37,042
-17
22 Oct 2026, 09:31
37,059
-31
20 Oct 2026, 23:15
37,090
-27
19 Oct 2026, 22:45
37,117
-40
18 Oct 2026, 19:55
37,157
-31
17 Oct 2026, 17:56
37,188
first reading
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 23 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 171 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
21.1%
avg views ÷ 36,769 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,750
1 post measured
Reaction rate
2.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 25 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 October 2026
Posts held
25 (23 February 2026 – 7 October 2026)
Views total
7,750
Reactions total
166
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 00:13 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
32s
Average length
32s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
11,705 reactions across 25 posts, in 46 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
6,691
57.2%
🤣
1,634
14.0%
😭
935
7.99%
❤🔥
475
4.06%
🔥
288
2.46%
🫡
201
1.72%
👍
158
1.35%
💋
144
1.23%
🤩
133
1.14%
😁
108
0.923%
👏
100
0.854%
💘
94
0.803%
🍓
68
0.581%
🎉
65
0.555%
😢
55
0.47%
🙉
54
0.461%
👾
53
0.453%
😴
44
0.376%
🤔
44
0.376%
💅
37
0.316%
26 further kinds
324
2.77%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,705 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 23 February 2026 to 7 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
77
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 25 we hold a reading for · 28%
Most on one post
50
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @official_banderitax. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 25 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 February 2026 to 7 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 1 post held from the last 30 days (100.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
اطلاق مسابقات سيرفر بندريتا في ماين كرافت
مسابقة افضل بناء في السباون :
`الجائزة : 100$
`
الفكرة : كل شخص ومهاراته بندر راح يختار اكثر مبنى يعجبه
موقع البناء : اراضي السباون فقط ( يلزم شرائها )
الية تحديد الفائز : بندر راح يختار الفائز في مقطع يوتيوب شورت
مسابقة افضل بناء يحمل هوية البطاطا:
`الجائزة : 100$`
مو شرط مزرعة او بطاطا بعينها شوف كيف تدمج هوية البطاطا بالمبنى حقك
موقع البناء : المكان الخاص فيك
الية تح…
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @official_banderitax. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 3 posts on @official_banderitax as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
18 September 2026
Most recent seen missing
7 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
31 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 31 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Team Falcons @TeamFalconsSA · 112,803 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 14 August 2026
رياكشنات🤎🇮🇶 @msra52 · 50,132 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 31 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BanderitaX” (@official_banderitax), 36,769 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/official_banderitax.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
