Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Открытый Философский Факультет

@off_philosophy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,500subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001393879726
TypeChannel
Username@off_philosophy
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/off_philosophy

Growth

2,4962,5032,499.56 August 2026 — 2,496 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,496 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,497 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,503 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,500 subscribers2,5006 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,495–2,504 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 03:342,500-3
10 Aug 2026, 09:532,503+6
7 Aug 2026, 05:232,497+1
6 Aug 2026, 12:472,496no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:382,496first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.0%
avg views ÷ 2,500 subscribers
Avg views / post
499
1 post measured
Reaction rate
4.61%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 July 2026
Posts held20 (7 May 202626 July 2026)
Views total499
Reactions total23
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

312 reactions across 19 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
18559.3%
❤‍🔥4313.8%
🔥4313.8%
🍓82.56%
😍82.56%
🤓61.92%
🎉51.60%
💔51.60%
🤩51.60%
👍10.321%
😢10.321%
🤔10.321%
🤷‍♀10.321%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 312reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 May 2026 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Jul 2026, 13:01 UTC499 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Пусть ОФФ ещё на каникулах, но мы решили напомнить, что весь курс Олега Аронсона "Границы политической теологии" уже собран и лежит на YouTube. Затишье, пожалуй, лучшее время, чтобы вернуться к этим записям и переслушать их в спокойном, медленном ритме. Этот разговор касается тех зон, где привычные смыслы перестают работать, где происходит столкновение с пределом человеческого и невыразимым. А опыт присутствия, сви

17❤‍🔥5🍓1

28 Jun 2026, 09:32 UTC≈1,060 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Друзья, открылась регистрация на ридинг! На ридинге мы обратимся к одной из центральных дискуссий ХХ века – дискуссии между Сартром и Хайдеггером. Два текста, две попытки понимания, две версии прочтения гуманизма, фигуры человека, свободы, выбора, заброшенности... Каждый из авторов предлагает не просто позицию в споре, но проект, осуществление которого может дать ответы на вопросы современности. Насколько звучит и з

🔥86💔1😢1

21 Jun 2026, 09:51 UTC≈1,300 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Друзья! Открыта регистрация на третью лекцию Ильи Мавринского о Хайдеггере. В этот раз поговорим о поэзии и технике как искусстве. ❗Если вы вдруг поймете, что не сможете прийти — пожалуйста, сдайте билет. Так на лекцию сможет попасть кто-то другой, кто очень хотел, но не успел зарегистрироваться. Ждём вас уже завтра! 📍 Шведский переулок, 2 ⏳ Начало в 19:00 Вход свободный по регистрации! Мероприятие организовано

🍓3😍3

15 Jun 2026, 10:59 UTC≈1,360 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Друзья, напоминаем! Сегодня (15 июня) уже через несколько часов ждём вас на вторую лекцию курса "Мартин Хайдеггер: возобновление вопроса", читает Илья Мавринский. 🗺️ Шведский переулок, 2 ⏳ Начало в 19:00 Вход свободный по регистрации! Мероприятие организовано совместно с Doctrina et Nobiles /Фото: Антанас Суткус/

🔥6🤓1

13 Jun 2026, 13:03 UTC≈1,370 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Друзья, завтра в 12:00 откроется регистрация на вторую лекцию "Мартин Хайдеггер: кто такие мы?" Мониторьте и успевайте! Места разлетаются за считанные минуты. ⚠️ Огромная просьба к тем, кто зарегистрировался, но не сможет прийти, — пожалуйста, возвращайте билет, чтобы у других была возможность посетить мероприятие. До встречи!

13🎉5🤩2🤓1

8 Jun 2026, 10:49 UTC≈1,420 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Друзья, кто не успел, но очень хотел! Специально для вас открыли регистрацию на ридинг. Успевайте!

6💔1🔥1🤷‍♀1

8 Jun 2026, 09:12 UTC≈1,350 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Друзья, напоминаем! Сегодня, 8 июня, к 19 часам ждём вас на лекции Ильи Мавринского "Мартин Хайдеггер: возобновление вопроса" - лекция 1. 🗺 Шведский переулок, 2 ❗Вход свободный, регистрация обязательна! Событие организовано совместно с Doctrina et Nobiles

❤‍🔥114🤓2💔1

4 Jun 2026, 14:27 UTC≈1,910 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026

​​Друзья, курс Аллы Митрофановой "От авангарда к ИИ и обратно к промту" полностью опубликован! Все три лекции уже доступны для просмотра и прослушивания. 🎞️ Смотрите: YouTube | Rutube | ВКонтакте 🎧 Слушайте: Podster | ВКонтакте | Telegram А в дискуссии после третьей лекции есть ещё один подарок всем нам. Редко, когда выпадает шанс стать свидетелями настоящего Диалога, обнаруживающего то самое пространство Различия

21😍4🔥2

31 May 2026, 09:12 UTC≈1,280 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

Друзья! Публикуем аудио третьей лекции "От авангарда к ИИ и обратно к промту", читает Алла Митрофанова. Cлушайте весь курс на других ресурсах: 🎧 Рodster | ВКонтакте Приятного прослушивания!

22🍓1🔥1

27 May 2026, 09:01 UTC≈1,440 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Друзья, уже сегодня ждём вас на четвёртой лекции курса Олега Аронсона "Границы политической теологии". В центре внимания – Жан Амери и его книга "По ту сторону вины и искупления". Приходите пораньше! Сейчас в Зверевском центре в самом разгаре бушует выставка Альберта Атояна – апокалиптическая, ироничная и монументальная. Это невероятный микс из строительного мусора, библейских сюжетов, графики Поллока и стёба над с

12🔥3🍓1💔1😍1

26 May 2026, 09:12 UTC≈1,400 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026

​Друзья! У нас прекрасные новости! Мы задружились с проектом Doctrina et Nobiles, который наверняка многим из вас уже знаком. А дружить мы умеем! Поэтому спешим анонсировать наше совместное событие — курс Ильи Мавринского "Мартин Хайдеггер: возобновление вопроса". В рамках этих четырёх встреч мы решили немного поэкспериментировать и попробовать поработать не только в лекционном формате, но и в формате ридинга. Прих

🔥159❤‍🔥2👍1

24 May 2026, 14:03 UTC≈1,710 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Друзья, как стремительно бежит время: уже заканчивается май, и курс Олега Аронсона медленно, но закономерно близится к своему финалу. На четвёртой лекции курса "Границы политической теологии" коснёмся фигуры Жана Амери – мыслителя, чьё мужество встретиться с бездной требует отклика. Авторское видение: Ключевая фигура лекции – Жан Амери и его книга "По ту сторону вины и искупления". Осмысляя свой опыт Освенцима, Аме

❤‍🔥115

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @off_philosophy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 984,900 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Открытый Философский Факультет” (@off_philosophy), 2,500 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/off_philosophy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.