Channel
@ofcgalaxtor
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Polls Β· Citations Β· Handles named that no longer answer Β· Cite this entry
8,796subscribers
-84 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 3,162β10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001323665135 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ofcgalaxtor |
| Created | 9 February 2021 β measured β cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ofcgalaxtor |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 14:07 | 8,796 | -43 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:57 | 8,839 | -35 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:48 | 8,874 | -6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:51 | 8,880 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 17 July 2025 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
105 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€βπ₯ | 69 | 65.7% | |
| π₯ | 19 | 18.1% | |
| π― | 17 | 16.2% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 105reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2025 to 4 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
π’ππ πππππ«π§π’π₯ πππ‘π pinned Β«SURAT PEMBERITAHUAN ββββββββββββββββββββ Tanggal γ € : 04 AGUSTUS 2025 No : 21/FO/GX Perihal : Pembubaran Salam 6 agama Selamat pagi/siang/sore/malam, salam sejahtera untuk kita semua. Bersama dengan surat ini, saya Gheralvinβ¦Β»
SURAT PEMBERITAHUAN ββββββββββββββββββββ Tanggal γ € : 04 AGUSTUS 2025 No : 21/FO/GX Perihal : Pembubaran Salam 6 agama Selamat pagi/siang/sore/malam, salam sejahtera untuk kita semua. Bersama dengan surat ini, saya Gheralvin selaku Founder dari Galaxtor Gank, mengumumkan pembubaran resmi @OFCGALAXTOR dikarenakan adanya kendala internal dan satu lain hal yang tidak bisa dijelaskan secarβ¦
β€βπ₯58π₯13π―10
Sticker, posted without a caption
π₯1
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
π END OF THIS CONTENT βΌοΈ βοΈ: Wah gimana temen-temen? Pada keren banget ya hewan-hewan di atas, jadi pengen pelihara semua. Dan ternyata konten malam ini sudah berakhir disini, wah kerasa cepet banget ya? βοΈ: Thank you so much buat Regax yang udah nyimak #β±€ΙGAΣΎKONTEN yang gua bawain malam ini dari awal sampai akhir. Semoga kalian terhibur dan ga bosen sama konten yang gua bawain ya! Sampai ketemu di konten selanjutβ¦
β€βπ₯4π―3π₯3
Signed #GXTWOFAMS Hansel L, gx.
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed #GXTWOFAMS Hansel L, gx.
Wah Regax, lucu banget ya hewan-hewan diatas, yang mana favorit kalian nihβ
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed #GXTWOFAMS Hansel L, gx.
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed #GXTWOFAMS Hansel L, gx.
4. JIFF SI ANJING POM πΆ πΆ π Yang terakhir ada Jiff si anjing pom alias Jeff Palm. Jiff hampir memiliki 10 juta pengikut karena kemampuannya. Jiff bisa disebut anjing selebgram karena feed instagramnya di isi dengan foto-foto kehidupan sehari-harinya. Dia biasanya update kalau dia lagi jalan jalan or shopping gitu temen-temen, seleb bener ya dia πΆ π Jiff memegang rekor waktu tercepat bagi seekor anjing untuk menempuβ¦
Signed #GXTWOFAMS Hansel L, gx.
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed #GXTWOFAMS Hansel L, gx.
3. SKIPPER SI BURUNG BEO π¦ π¦ π Kalau kalian pikir cuman Bini si kelinci yang bisa masukin bola ke ring, ada Skipper si burung beo yang bisa melempar cincin ke target. Skipper si burung beo ahli dalam hoopla sebuah permainan yang melempar cincin ke target. π¦ π Pada tahun 2016 Skipper mencetak rekor untuk most rings place on a target dalam satu menit dengan skor 19. Skipper memasukan 1 cincin ke dalam target hanya deβ¦
β€βπ₯2
Signed #GXTWOFAMS Hansel L, gx.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ofcgalaxtor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollβs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Wah Regax, lucu banget ya hewan-hewan diatas, yang mana favorit kalian nihβ
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only β there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each optionβs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionβs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2025 to 4 August 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind β an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results β and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank β 81,274 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 353 registered channels β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@ofcgalaxtor named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleβs history β see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today β not that anything βdiedβ. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel β we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπ’ππ πππππ«π§π’π₯ πππ‘πβ (@ofcgalaxtor), 8,796 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ofcgalaxtor.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.