Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

«Жизнь на 180 градусов»

@oekirova

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,327subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001671180736
TypeChannel
Username@oekirova
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/oekirova

Growth

1,3251,3291,3276 August 2026 — 1,325 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,325 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,329 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,327 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,324–1,330 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 14:151,327-2
9 Aug 2026, 23:361,329+4
6 Aug 2026, 12:161,325no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:071,325first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.1%
avg views ÷ 1,327 subscribers
Avg views / post
226
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
16.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held18 (25 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total4,073
Reactions total675
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 12:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

675 reactions across 18 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
21131.3%
🔥17025.2%
👍11517.0%
😁476.96%
❤‍🔥274.00%
👏223.26%
💯213.11%
😢192.81%
🤣142.07%
71.04%
🕊71.04%
🙏60.889%
🥰60.889%
🤗30.444%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 675reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 14:23 UTC118 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Девушки, добрый день! Давно подумывала пойти учиться стилю, читаю комментарии и точно теперь решила пойти)!

👍116🥰2

5 Aug 2026, 08:42 UTC136 views25 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Я полностью с этим согласна. От смены имиджа меняется даже самооценка. Это кстати наглядный пример того, что можно и нужно по другому. И в моменты когда жизнь, идет не по тому сценарию. Который мы себе выстроили, то такие перемены, лучше всего начать менять визуально, чтобы появился наглядный пример 🤔

👍136🔥6

5 Aug 2026, 03:55 UTC155 views60 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

В рубрике «Не нравится – меняй» обычно женщины. И вдруг – мужчина, доктор, который сменил джинсы на костюм и нашел любовь Холистический ортопед Анатолий Божков из Краснодара лечит людей целостно – не колено или шею, а всего человека. Но когда в 2017-м рухнул его собственный брак, он не знал, куда бежать. 10 лет качелей, скандалов, попыток склеить – и точка. Остался один. Психолог помогал, но внутри будто бетонная пл

🔥28❤‍🔥15👍8👏432

4 Aug 2026, 07:55 UTC162 views28 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @pytayus_otkryt_knizhny

И я такая, да )) Недавно, правда, у меня был обратный случай - собираюсь выйти из автобуса и у двери взгляд натыкается на очень знакомое лицо. Я старательно несколько секунд туплю, перебирая в уме, кто эта женщина. Она смотрит на меня, явно узнает тоже, мы улыбаемся друг другу и здороваемся. Потом выходим, я еще секунд 15 перебираю в уме варианты, пока не понимаю - мы не (!) знакомы вообще. Просто с утра часто ездим

🤣147🔥6😁1

4 Aug 2026, 05:35 UTC152 views45 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Новости из 2Е Еду в автобусе. В наушниках книга, мысли там же. И тут на меня обрушивается женщина со вторым подбородком и распростертыми объятиями. – Олечка! Боже мой, сколько лет! Как муж, дочка? Пока автобус трясся к моей остановке, я узнала ВСЕ. 🔘Ее дочка наконец поступила в медицинский. Со второго раза, но бюджет. Я так реально обрадовалась, что выпалила: «Ну слава богу!». А она прослезилась, потому что я про

17😁13🔥65👍2🤗2

3 Aug 2026, 09:09 UTC161 views37 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Рецепт «Антикризисный Бургер» Ингредиенты: 🍔 Булка — из самоиронии (самая свежая, а то черствеет быстро) 🍔 Котлета — из здорового пофигизма (бить не жалея, чтобы сочной была) 🍔 Сыр — из старых обид, но потертых на мелкой терке (они так лучше плавятся) 🍔 Соус — из чувства юмора (острый, но не обжигает) 🍔 Огурчик — из запасного плана (хрустит, когда всё идет не по плану)

🔥149👏8👍4🥰2

3 Aug 2026, 08:22 UTC158 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @stilnaya_koshelka

Оля, как же здорово ты придумала эту диету!))) Придерживаюсь принципов ПП)) Продукты типа зависти, злобы, обиды и раздражения в пищу стараюсь не употреблять)) Это несложно, главное, смотреть на все под правильным углом))) И неправда, что взгляды нельзя изменить!❤️😊

15

3 Aug 2026, 04:18 UTC171 views42 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Пока все садятся на модные диеты, я придумала свою – для души Пользуйтесь, если хочется сбросить лишние килограммы разочарования, грусти и эмоционального ожирения. Ингредиенты: 🔘внутренние сомнения – 1 пригоршня 🔘нежность к себе – стакан 🔘спокойствие – с хорошей горкой 🔘доброта – 2 полные ложки 🔘легкость – большой кусок, без экономии 🔘самоирония – 1 чайная ложка, для вкуса 🔘стресс – щепотка, и то только если совсем

27👍9🕊5🔥1

1 Aug 2026, 07:47 UTC216 views27 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @Evgeniadberega

К тараканам отношусь спокойно. Но думаю что если мы сами себе не взбодрим , то никто за нас это делать не будет. Никто никому ничего не должен. Не знаю как сформулировать, что бы никого не обидеть. Была на стажировке в прошлом году в одной из наших аптек. Пришла бабуся: маникюр, губки накрашены, костюм красивый на ней, на голове прическа- улитка, пахнет духами. В процессе разговора выясняю, что живет одна. Мужа нет

👍234

31 Jul 2026, 11:05 UTC256 views32 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @belovacalendar

Накрыть красивый стол для себя одной непросто, но иногда это тот самый первый шаг, который выводит из порочного круга одиночества со всеми вытекающими…

💯20👍9🔥3

31 Jul 2026, 04:08 UTC273 views64 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Я выпила чай с тараканами. И это было не самое страшное, что случилось в тот день Заскочила на днях к знакомой. Она работает в доме творчества. Поет, танцует, ведет кружки. Из тех людей, рядом с которыми кажется, что жизнь все еще умеет радовать. Мы сидим на кухне, чайник закипает, на столе сахарница. Беру ложку, а она... липкая. – Пью без сахара, – улыбнулась я и отодвинула ее. Мы разговариваем, вспоминаем знако

25😢19👍12🙏6👏2

29 Jul 2026, 14:11 UTC257 views26 reactionsread 6 August 2026

https://www.kuban.kp.ru/daily/277800/5279919/ Эльвира Новикова и "Комсомолку" восхитила

12🔥9👏4🕊1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @oekirova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 636,527 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“«Жизнь на 180 градусов»” (@oekirova), 1,327 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oekirova.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.