Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for один процент

Channel

один процент

@odinprosent

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,440subscribers

-22 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001729981543
TypeChannel
Username@odinprosent
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/odinprosent

Growth

2,4402,4622,4517 August 2026 — 2,462 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,461 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,459 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2,458 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,459 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,453 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,455 subscribers30 August 2026 — 2,454 subscribers2 September 2026 — 2,451 subscribers6 September 2026 — 2,440 subscribers7 August 20266 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 30 days, net -22. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,437–2,465 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 03:162,440-11
2 Sept 2026, 08:432,451-3
30 Aug 2026, 13:382,454-1
27 Aug 2026, 09:532,455+2
24 Aug 2026, 00:162,453-6
20 Aug 2026, 10:522,459+1
17 Aug 2026, 15:242,458-1
11 Aug 2026, 15:482,459-2
8 Aug 2026, 05:482,461-1
7 Aug 2026, 13:482,462first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 16 March 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

75 reactions across 7 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 93.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥7093.3%
custom 524013226031266358156.67%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 75 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 16 March 2025 to 18 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Jul 2026, 14:05 UTC433 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Разберу три мифа, с которыми сталкиваюсь чаще всего. Миф 1: «Мьюинг меняют форму челюсти лица» Нет. Форма челюсти определяется костной и мышечной структурой, которая не меняется от механического воздействия такого типа во взрослом возрасте, возможно до 18 лет есть как-то эффект, но исследованиями это не доказано .У мьюинга есть два потенциальных преимущества. Во-первых, при правильном выполнении он может визуально

🔥4

17 Jul 2026, 19:52 UTC465 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Почему хаотичные советы не работают В интернете реально есть почти вся информация, которая нужна. Про кожу, про осанку, про стиль, про уход за волосами. По отдельности — да, всё это можно найти бесплатно. Проблема не в информации. Проблема в последовательности. Вот пример. Представь, что тебе дали 50 отдельных деталей от механизма и сказали «собери». Все детали настоящие, все рабочие. Но без схемы сборки ты либо с

🔥4

16 Jul 2026, 19:59 UTC485 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

История: "Невидимка" Расскажу личную историю, которую обычно никому не рассказываю. Мне было 19. Я стоял в компании на дне рождения общего друга. Полтора часа разговоров — и ни одна девушка в комнате не посмотрела на меня дважды. Не потому что я говорил что-то не то. Я вообще не попадал в поле их внимания. Как будто меня частично не было в комнате. Это неприятное чувство. Не унижение, не отказ — хуже. Ты просто фо

🔥13

15 Jul 2026, 18:16 UTC569 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Что реально видит девушка в первые 3 секунды смотря на парня Есть данные по first impression(первое впечатление), которые почти никто не разбирает. За первые 3 секунды контакта мозг человека считывает не «красивое лицо». Он считывает набор сигналов статуса и здоровья. Вот на что реально падает внимание в первую очередь, по убыванию значимости: 1. Осанка и то, как человек занимает пространство 2. Состояние кожи (не

🔥9

14 Jul 2026, 12:22 UTC660 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ОДНА ВЕЩЬ КОТОРАЯ ИЗМЕНИЛА ВСЕ Два года назад мне начали попадаться фото и видео трансформаций парней, которым, как мне казалось, «просто повезло с внешностью». Я тогда не понимал одной вещи. А она изменила всё. То, что мозг считывает как «привлекательное лицо», почти никогда не построено на костной структуре. Оно построено на деталях, которые управляются осознанно: состояние кожи, тело, прическа, мышцы лица, оса

🔥16

19 Jun 2026, 15:15 UTC≈1,010 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

перестань терять лучшие годы жизни если ты подросток: 7 жестких истин Новое видео на ютуб Смотреть: https://youtu.be/n-TqvGcpFrQ?si=JU8vChXHLbqy39Nd

18 Jun 2026, 10:52 UTC≈1,050 viewsread 7 August 2026

Полгода на канале не было новых видео.. Сегодня выйдет видео, которое сильно отличается от того, что обычно у нас выходило Оно про подростковый возраст. Про время, которое кажется бесконечным, пока однажды не понимаешь, что несколько лет уже позади. Про ошибки, которые совершают почти все. И про вещи, которые я сам хотел бы понять намного раньше Но это видео не для того, чтобы кого-то напугать или читать мораль. С

16 May 2026, 12:16 UTC≈1,480 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Что вас беспокоит в собственной внешности больше всего?

  1. Кожа / прыщи49%
  2. Лишний вес / тело34%
  3. Стиль21%
  4. Общий вид лица46%

The shares total 150%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

18 Sept 2025, 13:05 UTC≈3,370 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ты не ур0дливый, ты просто ленивый Новое видео на ютуб Смотреть: https://youtu.be/ewP44fDlM7g?si=TekYA8Wzhgf275sV

16 Mar 2025, 14:53 UTC≈7,730 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 52401322603126635815

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @odinprosent. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 May 2026, 12:16 UTCAnonymous Poll229 voters

Что вас беспокоит в собственной внешности больше всего?

  1. Кожа / прыщи49%
  2. Лишний вес / тело34%
  3. Стиль21%
  4. Общий вид лица46%

The shares total 150%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 16 March 2025 to 18 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Писанина
@pisyanina · 34,191
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 3 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“один процент” (@odinprosent), 2,440 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/odinprosent.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.