AFP: Школы Эр-Рияда переходят на дистанционное обучение на одну неделю. Это происходит на фоне хуситской угрозы и продолжения обстрелов саудовской столицы и других городов. И у них никто не проводит бессмысленное голосование среди родителей на тему - как учиться их детям? Потому что голосуй - не голосуй, всегда будут недовольные. Завтра увидим, каким будет утро у одесских школьников.

Channel
Одесский хипиш
@odessahi
On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
24,449subscribers
+258 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002744348307 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @odessahi |
| Description | 📢 «Одесский хипиш» — это не новости. Это шум, который невозможно игнорировать. Это момент, когда в городе что-то трескается — и уже не получается сделать вид, что всё нормально. Без глянца. Без купюр. Без удобных формулировок. |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/odessahi |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 38% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 5 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
@politika_po_dneprovski · Channel23,640 subscribersРезонанс
@rezonansu · Channel22,983 subscribersБелый и черный список врачей, клиник
@docblacklist · Channel20,889 subscribersОдесский инсайдер
@odesin · Channel13,320 subscribersОдесса в курсе
@odessavkyrse · Channel9,756 subscribers
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 05:19 | 24,449 | -768 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 08:18 | 25,217 | -676 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 07:59 | 25,893 | +498 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 16:00 | 25,395 | -344 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 17:36 | 25,739 | +618 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 03:58 | 25,121 | +538 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 20:41 | 24,583 | -280 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 16:39 | 24,863 | +203 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:48 | 24,660 | -229 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 09:08 | 24,889 | -609 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:23 | 25,498 | +632 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 09:03 | 24,866 | +335 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 12:36 | 24,531 | -413 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 10:57 | 24,944 | +342 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 10:55 | 24,602 | +461 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 24,141 | +520 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 07:32 | 23,621 | -367 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 10:24 | 23,988 | +391 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:38 | 23,597 | -257 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 11:19 | 23,854 | first reading |
Engagement
103 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 33.1%
- avg views ÷ 24,449 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 8,090
- 47 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.095%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 47
- of 103 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 33 of 47 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 103 (13 July 2026 – 27 September 2026) |
| Views total | 380,029 |
| Reactions total | 278 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 12:06 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 310
- Videos
- 48
- Links
- 242
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 25m 57s
- Average length
- 1m 51s
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,337 reactions across 86 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 413 | 30.9% | |
| 🤔 | 407 | 30.4% | |
| 😱 | 60 | 4.49% | |
| 😢 | 59 | 4.41% | |
| 😭 | 50 | 3.74% | |
| 🤮 | 45 | 3.37% | |
| 👍 | 41 | 3.07% | |
| 👎 | 41 | 3.07% | |
| 💩 | 41 | 3.07% | |
| 😁 | 36 | 2.69% | |
| 🤬 | 36 | 2.69% | |
| 🤯 | 34 | 2.54% | |
| ❤ | 32 | 2.39% | |
| 🤡 | 29 | 2.17% | |
| 💊 | 5 | 0.374% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 0.299% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 0.15% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.075% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 0.075% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 89 of the 103 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,337 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 103 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 103 we hold a reading for · 1.0%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @odessahi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 103 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 July 2026 to 27 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Логика событий очень проста. Логика даже примитивна. Логика весьма болезненна… для многих. Моновластие – многовластие – безвластие – новая метла по-новому метет. Для понимания этого даже не надо смотреть по столичным сусекам. Достаточно посмотреть, как начинают трещать одесские закрома. И да, такого правительства у нас точно никогда не было.
И как показывает опыт, амбиции части депутатов могут быть гораздо западнее, западнее и западнее...
❤1
Таки есть мнение, что почти месячные каникулы у депутатов ВР связаны с тем, что саму Раду перебазируют во Львов. Депутатские тела нежные, им нужен комфорт и спокойствие. Ну и время, чтобы обустроиться на новом месте. А мы? Вопрос конечно, интересный.
ЛЕВОН НИГОСЯН ПОДВЁЛ ИТОГИ ПЕРВЫХ 50 ДНЕЙ В ИНСТИТУТЕ ФИЛАТОВА И.о. директора Института Филатова Левон Нигосян собрал коллектив и рассказал, что успели сделать за первые 50 дней его работы. Если коротко по основным тезисам, то за это время в институте провели аудит хозяйственной деятельности, усилили работу по научному направлению и отработали алгоритм бесперебойной работы учреждения во время отключений электроэнер…
🤡1
Вчера был очень важный день. Не в плане событий, тут все непросто. А что действительно важно, так это то, что появилась новая универсальная отмазка. Теперь на любую реформу, конгениальную идею и прочие творения вырожденцев можно сказать - в перспективе интересно, но в моменте идиотизм. И все у них так, "в моменте", без всяких перспектив.
События последних двух дней показали всю хрупкость современного цифрового мира. Уже сейчас понятно, что если по той или иной причине полностью вынести цифровую инфраструктуру, то жизнь становится иной. Миллиардные убытки от недополученной прибыли (заказы, рассылки и прочее), логистический коллапс, информационно-пропагандистский паралич общества, системные нарушения в работе транспорта, связи и многое, многое другое. …
Кстати, чтобы вы не забывали, Андрей Сиваш, как сообщает "Думская", - сын бывшего руководителя КП «Городской информационно-аналитический центр» и совладельца компании «Инт-медиа», которая разработала личный сайт Труханова. Похоже, там еще то кумовство и круговая порука. Как еще объяснить, что Сиваш в свое время умудрялся публично невежливо отвечать депутатам горсовета на их претензии. https://intent.press/ru/news/obs…
Вы заметили, что информационные снаряды вокруг "Доверяй делам" падают все ближе и ближе. То ли еще будет! Парадоксально, но это еще вчера мощный партийный бренд из-за непрерывных интриг, пустого глянца PRа и опоры на админресурс, превратился в объект огульной критики. Причем, даже вчерашние заклятые оппоненты готовы ситуативно объединятся по этой теме. Как говорится, все пойдем на святое дело!
Тут возник скандал о том, что якобы на сайте горсовета обнаружили контент с клубничкой. Не будем спешить осуждать и кричать, караул. Время сейчас сложное, завистников много, люди напряжены. Все может быть, разберутся и примут решение, В этом случае есть только один момент. На сайте горсовета может случится все что угодно, если директор департамента информации Андрей Сиваш лично (!!!) в рабочее время курирует создани…
Просто напомним, что в случае ЧП, невозможно будет сослаться на якобы решение и голосование родителей. Мол, именно они так решили и отправили своих детей в школу. Для разборов полетов это не играет никакой роли. Потом уже следователи будут выяснять, почему чиновники в условиях непрерывных воздушных атак приняли именно такое решение - идти на очное обучение. Это прежде всего ответственность администраторов, а не родит…
💯2
Сейчас на выходных, будет происходить мучительный процесс выбора формы обучения для одесских школьников на следующую неделю. Одной школы с выбитыми стеклами оказалось мало части родителей и отдельным администраторам от образования. Некоторые просто не понимают, что если они привели ребенка в школу, то он в условиях постоянных тревог и там не сможет получить знания. Им так проще, сбагрил ребенка, и все. Другие волнуют…
Showing the 12 most recent of 103 posts we hold for @odessahi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@odessahi edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 28 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 28 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Одесский хипиш” (@odessahi), 24,449 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/odessahi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.