Channel
@odamshahri
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
136subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001935464801 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @odamshahri |
| Description | Shaharlar odamlarga tegishli bo'ladi albatta. #odamshahri. Aloqa va kontent uchun @murodkudratov |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/odamshahri |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:31 | 136 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:14 | 136 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 30 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
27 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 14 | 51.9% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 33.3% | |
| 🆒 | 3 | 11.1% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 3.70% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2025 to 4 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @odamshahri. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2025 to 4 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Ba'zida birgina quvur shikastlanishi butun shaharga qimmatga tushishi mumkin. Toshkentda qurilish vaqtida magistral kanalizatsiya kollektoriga zarar yetkazildi. Xabarlarga ko'ra, kotlovan ichida oqova suv sathi 3–4 metrgacha ko'tarilgan. Ko'pchilik buni shunchaki suv bosdi deb o'ylashi mumkin. Aslida esa muammo bundan ancha jiddiy. 3–4 metr balandlikdagi suv kotlovan devorlariga katta bosim beradi. Grunt yuvilib k…
Signed Murod Kudratov
BIY chorrahasi: 20-40 million dollarlik ko‘prikmi yoki odamlar uchun qulay ko‘cha? Hokimiyat ushbu chorrahada ulkan yo‘l o‘tkazgich qurishni rejalashtirmoqda. Archemistry Urban jamoasi bu loyiha nega xato ekanligini va qanday qilib 8 baravar arzonroq hamda samaraliroq yechim topish mumkinligini tahlil qildi. ✅ Nega yo‘lni kengaytirish tirbandlikni yechmaydi? ✅ 286,000 piyoda nega e’tibordan chetda qoldi? ✅ Tejalgan…
👍3
Signed Murod Kudratov
@odamshahri
🆒2👏1
Signed Murod Kudratov
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥1
Signed Murod Kudratov
Aslida qanday boʻlishi kerak edi muhandislikda kichik detal boʻlmaydi.
🔥2
Signed Murod Kudratov
«Suzib ketgan» devor Toshkentdagi muhandislik fiaskosi tahlili. Kechagi Temur Malik va Buyuk Ipak yo‘li ko‘chalari kesishmasidagi devor qulashi— bu shunchaki favqulodda holat emas. Bu fizika qonunlari qanday qilib «shoshilinch» qurilish ustidan g‘olib kelishiga yaqqol misoldir. Muhandis va urbanist sifatida voqea videosini va unga bogʻliq boʻlgan ochiq maʼlumotlarni oʻrganib, shuni aytishim mumkinki: Bu — diagnoz. …
👍2🔥1
Signed Murod Kudratov
Видео обрушения части подпорной стены путепровода на пересечении улиц Темура Малика и Буюк Ипак Йули (бывший Троицкий мост) в Ташкенте. Telegram | Instagram | YouTube
Signed Murod Kudratov
Aylana harakat (roundabout) va oddiy chorraha (intersection) Yo‘l kesishgan joylarda yuzaga keladigan to‘qnashuv nuqtalari (conflict points) transport vositalari yoki piyodalar bir-biriga duch kelishi mumkin bo‘lgan joylardir. Nuqtalar qancha ko‘p bo‘lsa, avariya ehtimoli shuncha yuqori. Aylana harakat (roundabout) — to‘qnashuv nuqtalari an’anaviy chorrahalarga nisbatan sezilarli darajada kamayadi. Masalan, ba’zi s…
Signed iCas
Parallel Toshkentda kichik halqa yoʻli atrofida qurilgan veloyolakdan odamshahri fuqarolari maroq ila foydalanmoqda. @odamshahri
🔥4👍1
Signed iCas
Odamshahri Utrechtda hayot qaynamoqda. @odamshahri
👍1🔥1
Signed iCas
Go‘zallikning qanchalik samarali bo‘lishi mumkinligi haqida so‘z yuritadigan bo‘lsak...
👍7🆒1
Signed iCas
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @odamshahri. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“odamshahri | yo‘llarda bolalar o‘lmoqda” (@odamshahri), 136 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/odamshahri.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.