Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for oculus

Channel

oculus

@oculus_dairy

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

41subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001787150510
TypeChannel
Username@oculus_dairy
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 October 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/oculus_dairy

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 29 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4143427 August 2026 — 43 subscribers10 August 2026 — 43 subscribers24 August 2026 — 42 subscribers19 September 2026 — 43 subscribers3 October 2026 — 41 subscribers7 August 20263 October 2026
5 measurements spanning 56 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 41–43 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Oct 2026, 02:0141-2
19 Sept 2026, 05:0043+1
24 Aug 2026, 16:2542-1
10 Aug 2026, 17:0143no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:1743first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

36 reactions across 8 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 86.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3186.1%
👍411.1%
🔥12.78%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 16:42 UTC11 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Леденящий фильм о том, как легко принять одержимость за любовь, а контроль – за заботу. Это про фильм «Хлоя». Фильм не про измену, а про то, как страх и недоверие разрушают отношения… Кэтрин боится стареть, боится, что брак стал рутиной, и запускает механизм самоуничтожения, где жертвой становится не муж, а она сама. Хлоя – это человек с глубокой внутренней пустотой, которая пытается заполнить её через Кэтрин. Она…

❤3👍2🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 06:51 UTC14 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Три фильма о женщинах, которые сталкиваются с невидимостью, с угасанием собственной значимости в глазах мира, с тем, как время забирает то, что казалось незыблемым. ⭐️⭐️⭐️ «Хлоя» 2009 (США) «Шери» 2009 (Великобритания) «Та, которой не было» 2019 (Франция)

❤4

13 Jul 2026, 12:58 UTC35 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

«Дориан Грей» (2009): тёмный магнетизм самовлюблённости. Мрачная, но визуально роскошная история о том, как красота и порок сплетаются в гипнотический узор опасной свободы и холодного блеска. Дориан завораживает своей отстранённостью и самолюбованием. В нём есть что-то, от чего невозможно отвести взгляд, даже если внутри чувствуешь тревогу. Если хотите погрузиться в тёмную, но манящую атмосферу, то обязательно смо…

👍2

6 Jul 2026, 11:26 UTC23 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

подборка кружек из «Магнит косметик» ⭐️⭐️⭐️

❤6

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @oculus_dairy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“oculus” (@oculus_dairy), 41 subscribers as measured 3 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oculus_dairy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.