Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ochevидный 🛡post

Channel

Ochevидный 🛡post

@ochevidno_shit

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

707subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001609431820
TypeChannel
Username@ochevidno_shit
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ochevidno_shit

Growth

707708707.57 August 2026 — 707 subscribers8 August 2026 — 708 subscribers14 August 2026 — 707 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 707–708 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 10:35707-1
8 Aug 2026, 01:02708+1
7 Aug 2026, 06:01707first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 6 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

40 reactions across 9 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1742.5%
😁615.0%
👌512.5%
🙏512.5%
🐳410.0%
❤‍🔥12.50%
👀12.50%
🤨12.50%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 40reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 6 November 2025 to 7 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Jul 2026, 17:47 UTC230 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ЕБАТЬ МАТЧИК РЕБЯТА АРГЕНТИНА - ЕГИПЕТ ЕЩЁ ПОСИДИМ ЕЩЁ ПОСИДИМ

❤‍🔥1

28 Jun 2026, 21:29 UTC475 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Мне вот интересно, сейчас каждый второй делает арбитраж сканер через иишку У вас реально есть надежды что ИМЕННО ВАШ сканер станет популярным и вы будете лутать много денег? Да он нахуй никому не нужен как и сотни таких же сканеров, неважно какие фичи там будут, вы затрагиваете ультра маленькую часть аудитории и пытаетесь бороться между такими же. Думайте глубже ребят, обычным криптанам похуй какой сканер использов

👍6

18 Jun 2026, 20:37 UTC640 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вот и думайте Тем временем уже 2/2

👍2

18 Jun 2026, 13:55 UTC480 viewsread 7 August 2026

Какая же ахуенная арена и атмосфера на мажоре Уебаны на Нави, хз как можно было умудриться не пройти в плей-офф, но энивей не прошли бы спирит

16 Jun 2026, 15:42 UTC435 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

В этот раз тут будет 100% проход Кто кс смотрит жду ваше мнение

15 Jun 2026, 20:43 UTC396 viewsread 7 August 2026

Какие же все бездари Ну ниче плей-офф зато угадаю🙏🙏

12 Jun 2026, 16:27 UTC517 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Бля вы понимаете что Мекс SpaceX вырос только потому, что никому не дали аллоки и Мекс не смог залистить оригинальный токен поэтому они убрали страничку с ним и оставили только этот премаркет И получается люди пошли равнять спред, просто ебанутое совпадение, не иначе

👀1

12 Jun 2026, 15:53 UTC513 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://ru.tradingview.com/chart/?symbol=NASDAQ%3ASPCX Пошли торги

12 Jun 2026, 14:30 UTC470 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Объявляю xStocks пидорасами Не знаю как так произошло, но в итоге на всю крипту аллоки будет меньше чем Мекс на лаунчпадах продавал😁

😁2

10 Jun 2026, 10:14 UTC473 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вот такой вот пикемчик на 3 стадию

🤨1

26 Feb 2026, 14:06 UTC716 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Зак пишет что сегодня утром написал команде Аксиом о проблеме Также типы на полике сегодня запампили Axiom, тем самым заработав больше чем само расследование ЭТО ПРОСТО ПИЗДА КАКИЕ ЛЕГКИЕ ДЕНЬГИ, ТЕБЕ БУКВАЛЬНО ПИШЕТ ЧЕЛ И ГОВОРИТ - ХОЧЕШЬ ЛЕГАЛЬНО ЗАРАБОТАТЬ 500К ? ахах дурка

13 Jan 2026, 17:30 UTC649 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Кулстори Лежит на Стейке 1400$, раз в месяц могу зайти и покрутить казино за фантики (Fun Play), так и деньги не теряешь и азарт немного получаешь. Ну короче зашел в один слот, выбрал Фан Плей, покрутил, зашел во второй слот, ставлю ровно 1400$ чтобы прокрутить и увидеть сколько выиграю или проебу если бы свои ставил. Покупаю бонуску и через 10 секунд понимаю что купил на свои деньги. Подумал будет примерно 0$, по

😁4

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @ochevidno_shit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 592,761 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ochevидный 🛡post” (@ochevidno_shit), 707 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ochevidno_shit.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.