Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ОКейси, Вова

Channel

ОКейси, Вова

@ocasey_club

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

2,677subscribers

-44 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001891558990
TypeChannel
Username@ocasey_club
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ocasey_club

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,6772,7212,6997 August 2026 — 2,721 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,719 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,717 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2,711 subscribers21 August 2026 — 2,706 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,699 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,695 subscribers30 August 2026 — 2,691 subscribers2 September 2026 — 2,684 subscribers7 September 2026 — 2,682 subscribers11 September 2026 — 2,678 subscribers15 September 2026 — 2,677 subscribers7 August 202615 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 39 days, net -44. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,670–2,728 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 05:392,677-1
11 Sept 2026, 16:172,678-4
7 Sept 2026, 09:002,682-2
2 Sept 2026, 09:332,684-7
30 Aug 2026, 09:262,691-4
27 Aug 2026, 05:132,695-4
24 Aug 2026, 13:282,699-7
21 Aug 2026, 04:042,706-5
17 Aug 2026, 17:482,711-6
14 Aug 2026, 12:482,717-2
7 Aug 2026, 23:082,719-2
7 Aug 2026, 11:322,721first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

678 reactions across 18 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁21631.9%
18026.5%
🤣7210.6%
🕊619.00%
🔥558.11%
💔263.83%
👍233.39%
🙏111.62%
💯101.47%
❤‍🔥71.03%
🙈40.59%
🥴40.59%
custom 541148378163265093030.442%
🥰20.295%
🦄20.295%
👏10.147%
🤔10.147%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 678 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 October 2025 to 18 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 20 we hold a reading for · 30%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ocasey_club. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 October 2025 to 18 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

18 Apr 2026, 07:28 UTC655 views62 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Если вы не знали, как на самом деле рождаются стартапы — вот так. Дима, спасибо, что до сих пор меня не заблокировал

🤣39🔥9😁85👏1

10 Apr 2026, 11:57 UTC912 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Продакт в психологии = продакт в ставках на спорт У меня нет никакого отношения к продуктам в ставках на спорт, казино и iGaming-индустрии в целом. А уж бизнесово — подавно: эти бизнесы показывают рост постабильнее тех, в которых работаю я. Но сам я никогда не работал там: хотел развивать проекты, где помогаю людям жить лучше. Поэтому пошёл в психо_логию/терапию/атрию. А ещё в глазах общества я большой молодец: дела

22🔥3💯2

9 Apr 2026, 08:23 UTC835 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Прилетел в Грузию, и тут реклама...

😁17

1 Apr 2026, 11:05 UTC≈1,080 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Если я выйду на IPO, я никому об этом не скажу, но знаки будут...

😁26🙈4

16 Mar 2026, 19:47 UTC≈1,260 views17 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Сижу, пишу запрос к базе данных. Само собой не сам, а чатГПТ. И тот выдаёт мне код с ошибкой. А я вообще-то не лох какой-то, знаю ваши эскьюэли, у меня и сертификат есть! Пишу, мол, чувак, так не работает, у тебя ошибка, вот так надо исправить. Он такой «да, ты прав, переписал». И в конце выдаёт эту имбу. Спасибо, блять. Совет он мне как продакту даёт. Вот страх что продактов заменит ИИ, знаете, как рукой сняло.

😁17

12 Mar 2026, 11:29 UTC≈1,320 views15 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ничего необычного. Просто на сайте провайдера смс-рассылок написано, что их заказчик — РПЦ. Как происходит сбор контактов и есть ли там галочка согласия на получение рассылок конечно интересно, но намного интереснее, какие смски шлёт РПЦ? Есть варианты?

😁15

21 Feb 2026, 09:35 UTC≈1,420 views41 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

😁372🥰2

14 Feb 2026, 17:20 UTC≈1,510 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Вы жили во взрослом возрасте в коливингах с незнакомыми людьми? (Не типа с другом двушку пополам снимаем)

  1. Да, было круто12%
  2. Да, было так себе (напишите плиз почему)5%
  3. Нет, но планирую2%
  4. Нет, но звучит прикольно, я бы попробовал(а)22%
  5. Нет и не буду, точно не моё52%
  6. Другое6%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

14 Feb 2026, 17:18 UTC≈1,210 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Общага 30+ Подумал я дать дёру в путешествиях-номадстве, а потом посмотрел цены на жильё во всяких Европах и охуел. Нормальная однушка (!) около 150к плюс-минус. Это что за выступления вашего мастера? А потом нашёл их: ко-ливинги (общага на хипстерском, но для работающих). Цена поприятнее, ещё и круг знакомых-друзей появляется (а я одинок, поэтому 14 февраля пишу этот пост), но я никогда не жил так. Даже в студенче

😁64🦄2

9 Feb 2026, 17:25 UTC≈1,230 views58 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Высер на вайлдберриз По религиозным соображениям (и потому что в ПВЗ ВэБэШеЧкИ уебанский процесс выдачи товаров под камерами), я почти всегда пользуюсь озоном. Но есть бренды, которые работают только на ВБ, поэтому раз в столетие я там заказываю трусики. Вроде и приложение норм, и лента вполне умная, но как же меня бесит добавление в избранное с выбором размера. Ты не можешь поставить сердечко, тебе надо выбрать ра

😁349💯8🔥7

8 Feb 2026, 12:03 UTC≈1,100 views76 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Бу! Испугались? То-то же. Гадалка из тик-тока сказала, что там эра водолея началась, поэтому я решил воскреснуть и писать посты. Чисто чтоб свою натальную карту не позорить. Писать посты буду по-новому, потому что и год новый, и мне уже не 30 (мне 31) Я понял, что полезные постики в духе «ТОП-600 фреймворков для продактов» идут нахуй. Во-первых, чатГПТ справится лучше, во-вторых, пока нет задачи, изучать теорию =

48😁15👍8🤣4🔥1

27 Oct 2025, 06:07 UTC≈2,100 views157 reactions4 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Хочу признаться честно — ОКейси уже не торт. Не «стратегия изменилась» или «мы ушли в ребрендинг». Просто я проебался. Новость: наш ютуб-канал навсегда заблокировали (прям навсегда и безвозвратно, увы), и вместо того чтобы выдохнуть и признать усталость, я бодро изображал, что всё под контролем. А это не так. Я не в ресурсе, и давно. Парадокс: хорошая привычка продакта — не сдаваться — становится плохой, когда сдава

🕊6156💔26🙏11custom 54114837816326509303

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ocasey_club. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

14 Feb 2026, 17:20 UTCAnonymous Poll187 voters

Вы жили во взрослом возрасте в коливингах с незнакомыми людьми? (Не типа с другом двушку пополам снимаем)

  1. Да, было круто12%
  2. Да, было так себе (напишите плиз почему)5%
  3. Нет, но планирую2%
  4. Нет, но звучит прикольно, я бы попробовал(а)22%
  5. Нет и не буду, точно не моё52%
  6. Другое6%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Oct 2025, 15:09 UTCAnonymous Poll169 voters

Если вам в рилсах/тик-токах/шортсах попадаются фешн-блогеры с одеждой с wb и ozon, вы:

  1. Пролистываете47%
  2. Ищете сразу товар на маркетплейсе12%
  3. Скриншотите и потом ищете14%
  4. Тоните в скриншотах в телефоне и ничего не ищете15%
  5. Никогда такого не было12%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 October 2025 to 18 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ОКейси, Вова” (@ocasey_club), 2,677 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ocasey_club.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.