Если вы не знали, как на самом деле рождаются стартапы — вот так. Дима, спасибо, что до сих пор меня не заблокировал
🤣39🔥9😁8❤5👏1

Channel
@ocasey_club
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
2,677subscribers
-44 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001891558990 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ocasey_club |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ocasey_club |
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 05:39 | 2,677 | -1 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 16:17 | 2,678 | -4 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 09:00 | 2,682 | -2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 09:33 | 2,684 | -7 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 09:26 | 2,691 | -4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:13 | 2,695 | -4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 13:28 | 2,699 | -7 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 2,706 | -5 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:48 | 2,711 | -6 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 12:48 | 2,717 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:08 | 2,719 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:32 | 2,721 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
678 reactions across 18 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 216 | 31.9% | |
| ❤ | 180 | 26.5% | |
| 🤣 | 72 | 10.6% | |
| 🕊 | 61 | 9.00% | |
| 🔥 | 55 | 8.11% | |
| 💔 | 26 | 3.83% | |
| 👍 | 23 | 3.39% | |
| 🙏 | 11 | 1.62% | |
| 💯 | 10 | 1.47% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 1.03% | |
| 🙈 | 4 | 0.59% | |
| 🥴 | 4 | 0.59% | |
| custom 5411483781632650930 | 3 | 0.442% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 0.295% | |
| 🦄 | 2 | 0.295% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.147% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.147% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 678 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 October 2025 to 18 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ocasey_club. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 October 2025 to 18 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Если вы не знали, как на самом деле рождаются стартапы — вот так. Дима, спасибо, что до сих пор меня не заблокировал
🤣39🔥9😁8❤5👏1
Продакт в психологии = продакт в ставках на спорт У меня нет никакого отношения к продуктам в ставках на спорт, казино и iGaming-индустрии в целом. А уж бизнесово — подавно: эти бизнесы показывают рост постабильнее тех, в которых работаю я. Но сам я никогда не работал там: хотел развивать проекты, где помогаю людям жить лучше. Поэтому пошёл в психо_логию/терапию/атрию. А ещё в глазах общества я большой молодец: дела…
❤22🔥3💯2
Прилетел в Грузию, и тут реклама...
😁17
Если я выйду на IPO, я никому об этом не скажу, но знаки будут...
😁26🙈4
Сижу, пишу запрос к базе данных. Само собой не сам, а чатГПТ. И тот выдаёт мне код с ошибкой. А я вообще-то не лох какой-то, знаю ваши эскьюэли, у меня и сертификат есть! Пишу, мол, чувак, так не работает, у тебя ошибка, вот так надо исправить. Он такой «да, ты прав, переписал». И в конце выдаёт эту имбу. Спасибо, блять. Совет он мне как продакту даёт. Вот страх что продактов заменит ИИ, знаете, как рукой сняло.
😁17
Ничего необычного. Просто на сайте провайдера смс-рассылок написано, что их заказчик — РПЦ. Как происходит сбор контактов и есть ли там галочка согласия на получение рассылок конечно интересно, но намного интереснее, какие смски шлёт РПЦ? Есть варианты?
😁15
Video message, posted without a caption
😁37❤2🥰2
Вы жили во взрослом возрасте в коливингах с незнакомыми людьми? (Не типа с другом двушку пополам снимаем)
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Общага 30+ Подумал я дать дёру в путешествиях-номадстве, а потом посмотрел цены на жильё во всяких Европах и охуел. Нормальная однушка (!) около 150к плюс-минус. Это что за выступления вашего мастера? А потом нашёл их: ко-ливинги (общага на хипстерском, но для работающих). Цена поприятнее, ещё и круг знакомых-друзей появляется (а я одинок, поэтому 14 февраля пишу этот пост), но я никогда не жил так. Даже в студенче…
😁6❤4🦄2
Высер на вайлдберриз По религиозным соображениям (и потому что в ПВЗ ВэБэШеЧкИ уебанский процесс выдачи товаров под камерами), я почти всегда пользуюсь озоном. Но есть бренды, которые работают только на ВБ, поэтому раз в столетие я там заказываю трусики. Вроде и приложение норм, и лента вполне умная, но как же меня бесит добавление в избранное с выбором размера. Ты не можешь поставить сердечко, тебе надо выбрать ра…
😁34❤9💯8🔥7
Бу! Испугались? То-то же. Гадалка из тик-тока сказала, что там эра водолея началась, поэтому я решил воскреснуть и писать посты. Чисто чтоб свою натальную карту не позорить. Писать посты буду по-новому, потому что и год новый, и мне уже не 30 (мне 31) Я понял, что полезные постики в духе «ТОП-600 фреймворков для продактов» идут нахуй. Во-первых, чатГПТ справится лучше, во-вторых, пока нет задачи, изучать теорию = …
❤48😁15👍8🤣4🔥1
Хочу признаться честно — ОКейси уже не торт. Не «стратегия изменилась» или «мы ушли в ребрендинг». Просто я проебался. Новость: наш ютуб-канал навсегда заблокировали (прям навсегда и безвозвратно, увы), и вместо того чтобы выдохнуть и признать усталость, я бодро изображал, что всё под контролем. А это не так. Я не в ресурсе, и давно. Парадокс: хорошая привычка продакта — не сдаваться — становится плохой, когда сдава…
🕊61❤56💔26🙏11custom 54114837816326509303
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ocasey_club. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Вы жили во взрослом возрасте в коливингах с незнакомыми людьми? (Не типа с другом двушку пополам снимаем)
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Если вам в рилсах/тик-токах/шортсах попадаются фешн-блогеры с одеждой с wb и ozon, вы:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 October 2025 to 18 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ОКейси, Вова” (@ocasey_club), 2,677 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ocasey_club.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.