Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for OC.only

Channel

OC.only

@oc_only

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,624subscribers

+19 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002260663738
TypeChannel
Username@oc_only
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/oc_only

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,6051,6541,629.56 August 2026 — 1,605 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,606 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,612 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,627 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,645 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,648 subscribers22 August 2026 — 1,654 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,647 subscribers31 August 2026 — 1,651 subscribers3 September 2026 — 1,650 subscribers8 September 2026 — 1,641 subscribers12 September 2026 — 1,628 subscribers16 September 2026 — 1,624 subscribers1,6246 August 202616 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 40 days, net +19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,598–1,661 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 02:191,624-4
12 Sept 2026, 13:581,628-13
8 Sept 2026, 14:391,641-9
3 Sept 2026, 08:321,650-1
31 Aug 2026, 08:451,651+4
28 Aug 2026, 13:361,647-7
22 Aug 2026, 14:151,654+6
19 Aug 2026, 09:151,648+3
16 Aug 2026, 09:061,645+18
13 Aug 2026, 05:461,627+15
10 Aug 2026, 04:501,612+6
7 Aug 2026, 14:311,606+1
6 Aug 2026, 19:311,605first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
18s
Average length
18s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

137 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🦄5036.5%
🆒4835.0%
💔3928.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 137 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 18:32 UTC189 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

💥💥#предложка | вопрос от анона: ☕ Было ли у вас такое, что вы сами удивились тому что написали ? (в хорошем смысле) Или запутались в собственном персонаже? ("Он хороший или плохой?" ) До сих пор голова закипает прописывать одного персонажа из книги. Она получилась настолько многогранной и сложной, будучи второстепенной, что я не могу понять антагонист ли она или протагонист. Настолько серый и колеблющийся образ, что…

🦄9🆒5💔1

Signed гниль.ru

5 Aug 2026, 20:50 UTC312 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🌟 #ос_инсайды | За референсы из Pinterest пора штрафовать? В X (Twitter) зашло обсуждение канонов стиля «Лолита» и чем можно заменить Pinterest, если вы хотите больше разнообразных референсов для создания своих персонажей. На пост отреагировала художница Miel, чьи персонажи в стиле данной субкультуры обрели популярность в соцсетях: Я думаю, что как только ты разберёшься с правилами субкультуры, подстилями и брендам…

💔11🦄6🆒4

Signed гниль.ru

5 Aug 2026, 19:00 UTC303 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

💥💥#предложка | пост от @harminee: Моя лаулечка, использую её везде где только можно. Она со мной много лет, но до сих пор у неё нет даже устоявшегося имени Пыталась придумать для неё лор, но два из них забросились, а один на столько разросся, что она там стала лишней и я её вырезала Ей не везёт, так что интересно послушать хедканоны на мир в котором она могла бы жить Она инженер создающий бесполезные изобретения и …

💔6🦄5🆒1

Signed гниль.ru

4 Aug 2026, 17:32 UTC442 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

💙 #ос_инсайды | "Я не толстый ненавистник, но..." — витубер жёстко про персонажей с лишним весом. В тиктоке вновь разгорелся конфликт вокруг витубера Yurress, поводом для которого стал обзор гяру-модельки с пышными формами. Стример заявил, что акцентирование внимания на животе с помощью украшений и узкой одежды — это романтизация болезни. Пользователи разделились на два лагеря — часть негодуют и обвиняют Юрца в фет…

💔21🦄4🆒3

Signed гниль.ru

3 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC≈1,990 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈 от @Artist_n_vtubers & @oc_only 😈 😈уть ивента 🦷 : 🥹 Мы набираем несколько участников от каждого канала и разделяем их на две команды. 🥹 На время голосований каналы будут закрыты и в каждом будут выбирать лучших участников из противоположной команды. 🥹 По итогу два оставшихся победителя из обоих команд должны столкнуться в финале. 🦷😈словия участия: ➡️ Подписка на организаторов👤 ➡️ Репост в …

🆒14🦄10

Signed гниль.ru

2 Aug 2026, 18:50 UTC441 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

💥💥#предложка | вопрос от @kinakimaela: ВОПРОС СРОЧНЫЙ И БЕЗОТЛАГАТЕЛЬНЫЙ Ваше отношение к шиппингу ваших осов со стороны вашей аудитории? Тоесть если бы ваших осов шиперили как бы вы отнеслись к этому? Если бы шип был бы на столько не предсказуемым что вы бы сами до такого не додумались бы? ‼️OC.ONLY / / ПРЕДЛОЖИТЬ ПОСТ

🆒7🦄5

Signed гниль.ru

2 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC439 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

💙 #ос_инсайды | Аномальные головоломки. Художник Akuicia представляет своих оригинальных персонажей через довольно необычный формат постов, создавая целые загадки с их участием. Перевела парочку на русский — сможете решить? (Отгадка под спойлером.) ‼️OC.ONLY / / ССЫЛКА НА АВТОРА

🆒14🦄11

Signed гниль.ru

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @oc_only. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 23 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“OC.only” (@oc_only), 1,624 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oc_only.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.