Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for [[PRO Obsidian]]

Channel

[[PRO Obsidian]]

@obsidianrus

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,283subscribers

+157 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001881685355
TypeChannel
Username@obsidianrus
Description✍🏼 Настройки, плагины, лайфхаки, новости из мира Obsidian. @Second_brain_ru - дружественный канал по методикам и инструментам для создания личных баз знаний
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/obsidianrus

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

9,1269,2839,204.57 August 2026 — 9,126 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,126 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,129 subscribers14 August 2026 — 9,151 subscribers17 August 2026 — 9,158 subscribers20 August 2026 — 9,171 subscribers24 August 2026 — 9,172 subscribers27 August 2026 — 9,167 subscribers30 August 2026 — 9,169 subscribers2 September 2026 — 9,182 subscribers7 September 2026 — 9,198 subscribers11 September 2026 — 9,217 subscribers15 September 2026 — 9,223 subscribers27 September 2026 — 9,242 subscribers5 October 2026 — 9,239 subscribers11 October 2026 — 9,254 subscribers15 October 2026 — 9,258 subscribers17 October 2026 — 9,264 subscribers20 October 2026 — 9,270 subscribers23 October 2026 — 9,278 subscribers26 October 2026 — 9,277 subscribers28 October 2026 — 9,270 subscribers31 October 2026 — 9,282 subscribers4 November 2026 — 9,276 subscribers7 November 2026 — 9,274 subscribers11 November 2026 — 9,283 subscribers7 August 202611 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 96 days, net +157. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,102–9,307 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 10:469,283+9
7 Nov 2026, 08:209,274-2
4 Nov 2026, 07:559,276-6
31 Oct 2026, 22:369,282+12
28 Oct 2026, 18:019,270-7
26 Oct 2026, 04:409,277-1
23 Oct 2026, 07:259,278+8
20 Oct 2026, 11:569,270+6
17 Oct 2026, 20:199,264+6
15 Oct 2026, 01:289,258+4
11 Oct 2026, 19:389,254+15
5 Oct 2026, 12:389,239-3
27 Sept 2026, 11:569,242+19
15 Sept 2026, 14:189,223+6
11 Sept 2026, 15:219,217+19
7 Sept 2026, 09:419,198+16
2 Sept 2026, 08:449,182+13
30 Aug 2026, 11:349,169+2
27 Aug 2026, 09:049,167-5
24 Aug 2026, 03:149,172first reading

Engagement

51 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.2%
avg views ÷ 9,283 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,430
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 51 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held51 (15 July 2026 – 14 November 2026)
Views total34,050
Reactions total354
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Nov 2026, 12:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
951
Videos
31
Links
489

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 37s
Average length
1m 37s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,428 reactions across 50 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥67046.9%
❤31622.1%
👍30921.6%
✍312.17%
🤝241.68%
🤔231.61%
⚡201.40%
💯171.19%
👀70.49%
🎉40.28%
😁30.21%
🆒20.14%
👏10.07%
🤯10.07%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 50 of the 51 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,428 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 50 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @obsidianrus. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 51 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 July 2026 to 14 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 14 posts held from the last 30 days (35.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

14 Nov 2026, 14:23 UTC≈1,200 views19 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

✍️ Перо в Obsidian: три способа писать от души руки прямо в хранилище Уже почти год назад, в декабре, я собирал здесь подборку плагинов для рукописных заметок. Большинство из них тогда переносили бумагу в хранилище: скан, фото, распознавание текста. За год появились плагины, которые дают писать пером прямо в Obsidian, и подходов у них три: поверх заметки, на бесконечном холсте и в отдельном приложении для iPad. ✏️ …

❤8🔥8👍3

13 Nov 2026, 07:13 UTC≈1,550 views24 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

🗂 Одно хранилище или несколько: три вопроса перед вторым Новичок в Obsidian часто застревает ещё до первой заметки: завести одно хранилище на всё или разнести работу, личное и учёбу по разным? На форуме Obsidian этому посвящён тред 2020 года: 75 тыс. просмотров, 90 ответов, последний - уже в далеком январе этого года. Если собрать ответы участников, получается три вопроса. 1️⃣ Нужны ли ссылки между частями? Между …

❤13👍6🔥3💯2

12 Nov 2026, 10:44 UTC≈1,670 views23 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

🛡 Пять правил перед тем, как пустить LLM в хранилище На 👽 Reddit в r/PKMS человек честно рассказал, как LLM незаметно испортила ему хранилище на 1,4 тысячи заметок. Модель выжимала суть из инбокса, резала её на атомарные заметки и связывала. Месяц-другой всё шло гладко. А в итоге получилась полная хрень: ◽️ четыре почти одинаковые заметки про одно понятие, написанные с разницей в несколько недель; ◽️ после переимен…

👍18🔥2✍1❤1🆒1

11 Nov 2026, 06:20 UTC≈2,040 views21 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

🔓 «Это просто Markdown» — правда наполовину Главный аргумент за Obsidian: заметки это просто обычные файлы, уйти можно в любой момент. Я и сам так говорю. А потом посчитал, что в моём хранилище потенциально переживёт переезд. Из 4 835 заметок без синтаксиса, который ломается вне Obsidian, обходятся 2 283 — меньше половины. В 1 070 заметках сидит строчка из моего старого шаблона: «Изменено: = dateformat(this.file.mt…

🔥11👍7❤3

10 Nov 2026, 07:44 UTC≈2,090 views40 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

🤖 AI в Obsidian без каши: собрал всё в один гайд В Obsidian у вас сотни заметок, а на вопрос «что я уже об этом записывал?» вы до сих пор отвечаете перебором папок. Нейросеть может отвечать за вас - по вашим же заметкам. Сложность в другом: плагинов десятки, у каждого свои ключи и модели, и непонятно, с какого начать. В январе мы разбирали Copilot по шагам в серии постов. Теперь собрал всю тему в один документ и об…

🔥26👍11❤3

9 Nov 2026, 07:30 UTC≈2,290 views2 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Poll

Сколько сторонних плагинов постоянно включено в вашем основном хранилище?

  1. 0–1047%
  2. 11–2032%
  3. 21–5016%
  4. 51–1004%
  5. Больше 1002%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🤝2

9 Nov 2026, 07:30 UTC≈2,230 views18 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

🔌 В каталоге Obsidian уже больше 10 000 плагинов На Reddit отметили круглую цифру, и я пересчитал по официальному реестру: сегодня там 10 143 плагина. Весной их было почти вчетверо меньше. В марте я подавал свой Improved Random Note Pro по старой схеме: пулреквест на GitHub и очередь на ручную проверку. В каталоге тогда было около 2 740 плагинов, и за месяц прибавлялось полтора-два десятка. 12 мая Obsidian открыл …

🔥13👍3❤1👏1

8 Nov 2026, 08:01 UTC≈2,250 views19 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

🤖 Чат-бот ответит по вашим документам, но понимать за вас не станет Весной весь ИИ-сегмент бурлил обсуждал вики Андрея Карпатого «вместо RAG»: у его твита почти 22 миллиона просмотров. Шум улёгся, а в головах осталась простая мысль: структурировать ничего не нужно, загружаешь документы и спрашиваешь. Кнопка «спросить свою базу» теперь в каждом втором плагине. И логичный вопрос а нахрена тогда зачем вообще строить св…

👍14❤4🔥1

7 Nov 2026, 07:45 UTC≈2,280 views28 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

🧘 Minimal: тема, которая убирает все лишнее с глаз долой Minimal это у нас самая скачиваемая тема Obsidian: 2,75 млн загрузок. У второго места, Things, вдвое меньше - 1,38 млн. Почти каждое восьмое скачивание тем приходится на неё. Как ни парадоксально, но пользователи Ценят её не за то, что она показывает, а за то, чего на экране нет: меньше рамок, цветных пятен и кнопок. Это видно уже по дефолтным настройкам. Цве…

👍14❤8🔥5🤔1

5 Nov 2026, 07:32 UTC≈2,820 views32 reactionsread 15 November 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥19❤11⚡1✍1

3 Nov 2026, 11:26 UTC≈2,880 views16 reactionsread 15 November 2026

Posted without readable text

🤝11❤2🔥2👍1

2 Nov 2026, 09:55 UTC≈2,840 views36 reactions1 Starread 15 November 2026

Posted without readable text

❤19🔥11👍5✍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 51 posts we hold for @obsidianrus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@obsidianrus edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
26 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Nov 2026, 07:30 UTCAnonymous Poll472 voters

Сколько сторонних плагинов постоянно включено в вашем основном хранилище?

  1. 0–1047%
  2. 11–2032%
  3. 21–5016%
  4. 51–1004%
  5. Больше 1002%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 14 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Ноотропы и Биохакинг | RISE
@mind_rise · 38,787
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 15 September 2026
Максим Дорофеев: Прокрастинация и джедайские техники
@mnogosdelal · 25,885
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“[[PRO Obsidian]]” (@obsidianrus), 9,283 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/obsidianrus.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.