Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ваня Обществознайка из ЕГЭЛЕНД | ОГЭ обществознание

Channel

Ваня Обществознайка из ЕГЭЛЕНД | ОГЭ обществознание

@obshestvoznaika_oge_el

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

45,696subscribers

+10,998 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002089237578
TypeChannel
Username@obshestvoznaika_oge_el
DescriptionТут я без воды рассказываю, как сдать ОГЭ по обществознанию на максимум Подготовка со мной: https://t.me/obsh_el
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/obshestvoznaika_oge_el

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

34,63645,69640,1667 August 2026 — 34,698 subscribers7 August 2026 — 34,698 subscribers8 August 2026 — 34,723 subscribers9 August 2026 — 34,673 subscribers10 August 2026 — 34,636 subscribers11 August 2026 — 34,690 subscribers12 August 2026 — 35,148 subscribers13 August 2026 — 35,180 subscribers14 August 2026 — 35,337 subscribers16 August 2026 — 35,758 subscribers17 August 2026 — 35,944 subscribers18 August 2026 — 36,613 subscribers19 August 2026 — 38,147 subscribers20 August 2026 — 39,289 subscribers21 August 2026 — 40,139 subscribers23 August 2026 — 41,032 subscribers24 August 2026 — 41,463 subscribers26 August 2026 — 41,847 subscribers26 August 2026 — 41,976 subscribers28 August 2026 — 42,223 subscribers29 August 2026 — 42,290 subscribers30 August 2026 — 42,424 subscribers31 August 2026 — 42,540 subscribers1 September 2026 — 42,625 subscribers1 September 2026 — 42,867 subscribers3 September 2026 — 43,167 subscribers4 September 2026 — 43,659 subscribers7 September 2026 — 44,701 subscribers10 September 2026 — 45,242 subscribers12 September 2026 — 45,199 subscribers14 September 2026 — 45,331 subscribers15 September 2026 — 45,471 subscribers17 September 2026 — 45,696 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 41 days, net +10,998. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32,977–47,355 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 17:5645,696+225
15 Sept 2026, 17:2045,471+140
14 Sept 2026, 02:5745,331+132
12 Sept 2026, 09:1545,199-43
10 Sept 2026, 06:5745,242+541
7 Sept 2026, 01:5944,701+1,042
4 Sept 2026, 09:3943,659+492
3 Sept 2026, 00:1843,167+300
1 Sept 2026, 22:2742,867+242
1 Sept 2026, 01:3442,625+85
31 Aug 2026, 01:1742,540+116
30 Aug 2026, 02:5642,424+134
29 Aug 2026, 03:4742,290+67
28 Aug 2026, 00:2642,223+247
26 Aug 2026, 23:2841,976+129
26 Aug 2026, 02:5941,847+384
24 Aug 2026, 23:3541,463+431
23 Aug 2026, 09:3341,032+893
21 Aug 2026, 20:0640,139+850
20 Aug 2026, 18:3639,289first reading

Engagement

177 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 97 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.25%
avg views ÷ 45,696 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,400
90 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
91
of 177 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026
Posts held177 (25 July 2026 – 25 September 2026)
Views total215,891
Reactions total4,330
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken25 Sept 2026, 20:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,800
Videos
≈426
Links
≈1,070

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
11m 37s
Average length
50s

Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

6,941 reactions across 175 posts, in 34 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2,94642.4%
❤‍🔥85912.4%
🔥85812.4%
💘4907.06%
💋3865.56%
🍓3444.96%
🎉2032.92%
🤝1852.67%
👍1602.31%
🤔1091.57%
🥰660.951%
💔610.879%
😭580.836%
💯340.49%
😁330.475%
👏210.303%
😢190.274%
😨160.231%
😱150.216%
🥱140.202%
14 further kinds640.922%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 175 of the 177 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,941 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 177 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Sept 2026, 14:21 UTC690 views13 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Photo

МЫ РАЗОБЛАЧИЛИ СОСТАВИТЕЛЕЙ ОГЭ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ родные, завтра в 16.30 Настя Русичка проведет самый полезный вебинар этой осени за 0₽ ⤵️ ➖Узнаешь, что изменилось в ОГЭ по методическим рекомендациям ФИПИ — и что это значит для тебя ➖Прогноз заданий и тем, которые будут на экзамене 2027 года ➖Самые частые ошибки прошлых лет, на которых валятся ученики каждый год — и как их избе…

❤7❤‍🔥4🔥2

25 Sept 2026, 12:44 UTC≈1,220 views59 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Photo

Они утонули.… 🥀💔 ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ Сборники состоят из 80% воды 👇🏻 - в сборниках нет всех типов заданий, которые могут попасться на реальном ОГЭ. Задания есть в банке ФИПИ, к примеру, только по математике их там больше 3.000 - просто свериться с ответом недостаточно: важно понять, где и почему возникла ошибка. Сборник этого - сборник может не соответствовать актуальному экзам…

❤‍🔥31❤15🔥8🍓3🤔2

25 Sept 2026, 08:48 UTC≈1,240 views212 reactionsread 25 September 2026

Соц опрос - кто купил себе сборник для подготовки к общаге?? ❤️ - я 🔥 - не я 🍓 - учитель заставил купить..

🔥169❤32🍓11

24 Sept 2026, 14:18 UTC841 views8 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Forwarded from @russichka_el_ogePhoto

ДАРИМ КУРС ПО ИТОГОВОМУ СОБЕСЕДОВАНИЮ 🗣️ Уже в феврале каждого 9-классника ждет первый экзамен – и это устный русский. Это ваш допуск к ОГЭ, и завалить его вообще не вариант, потому что без него вас просто не пустят на экзамены весной и летом. Поэтому готовимся заранее 👇 Мы даём вам возможность сделать это за 0р) до 1 октября при покупке годового курса мы ДАРИМ спецкурс по итоговому собеседованию Это то, что нуж…

❤4💘2🔥2

24 Sept 2026, 11:18 UTC≈1,440 views9 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Poll

Какие чувства у вас вызывает мысль о том, что в феврале нужно сдавать устный собес?

  1. Радость4%
  2. Гнев12%
  3. Страх51%
  4. Ненависть17%
  5. Принятие37%
  6. По приколу26%

The shares total 147%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

❤8💘1

24 Sept 2026, 10:25 UTC≈1,570 views18 reactionsread 25 September 2026

Posted without readable text

❤11❤‍🔥5💘2

23 Sept 2026, 20:20 UTC≈1,720 views32 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥16💘7💋5❤3👍1

23 Sept 2026, 13:48 UTC≈1,830 views30 reactionsread 25 September 2026

А наш годовой уже летит в стратосферу…

💘13❤‍🔥7💋4🍓3❤1🔥1🤝1

23 Sept 2026, 13:43 UTC≈1,790 views18 reactionsread 25 September 2026

Posted without readable text

❤10❤‍🔥4💘4

23 Sept 2026, 10:32 UTC≈1,800 views28 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Poll

Родные, готовлю для вас много контента, что хотите видеть в канале?

  1. Пользу в картинках37%
  2. Опросы и практику68%
  3. Полезные видео разборы61%
  4. Короткое объяснение в кружках26%
  5. Полезные подкасты34%
  6. Лайф контент18%

The shares total 244%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

💘15❤6❤‍🔥4💋3

22 Sept 2026, 12:31 UTC≈2,120 views37 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Photo

ОГЭ РЕАЛЬНО ПЕРЕДЕЛАЛИ??? ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ Родные, записал для вас короткий ролик, где разобрал все главные изменения ОГЭ 2027 👇🏻 💙Смотреть ВК 📺Смотреть ЮТ записаться на годовой до закрытия набора 🤩

❤21🔥11😇3😢2

Showing the 12 most recent of 177 posts we hold for @obshestvoznaika_oge_el. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@obshestvoznaika_oge_el edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
19 August 2026
Most recent edit
19 August 2026

Polls

The 6 most recent of 8 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

24 Sept 2026, 11:18 UTCAnonymous Poll489 voters

Какие чувства у вас вызывает мысль о том, что в феврале нужно сдавать устный собес?

  1. Радость4%
  2. Гнев12%
  3. Страх51%
  4. Ненависть17%
  5. Принятие37%
  6. По приколу26%

The shares total 147%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

23 Sept 2026, 10:32 UTCAnonymous Poll408 voters

Родные, готовлю для вас много контента, что хотите видеть в канале?

  1. Пользу в картинках37%
  2. Опросы и практику68%
  3. Полезные видео разборы61%
  4. Короткое объяснение в кружках26%
  5. Полезные подкасты34%
  6. Лайф контент18%

The shares total 244%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

22 Sept 2026, 08:53 UTCAnonymous Poll593 voters

ребят, открывали демоверсию ОГЭ?

  1. Да51%
  2. Нет54%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

14 Sept 2026, 08:32 UTCAnonymous Poll681 voters

Что отличает человека от животных?

  1. 17%
  2. 292%
  3. 34%
  4. 410%

The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

13 Sept 2026, 10:28 UTCAnonymous Poll428 voters

Как вам идея пройти ВЕСЬ блок ЧиО в понедельник?

  1. топ28%
  2. отлично37%
  3. норм17%
  4. ну…22%
  5. да!!!43%

The shares total 147%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

14 Aug 2026, 10:53 UTCAnonymous Poll277 voters

Кто хотел бы узнать, как готовиться ОГЭ 2027?

  1. Ну я26%
  2. Яяяяя70%
  3. Пока не знаю7%
  4. А что такое ОГЭ?16%

The shares total 119%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 177 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 25 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ваня Обществознайка из ЕГЭЛЕНД | ОГЭ обществознание” (@obshestvoznaika_oge_el), 45,696 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/obshestvoznaika_oge_el.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.