Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Славный Друже Oblomoff

Channel

Славный Друже Oblomoff

@oblomoffspb

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

121,883subscribers

-1,593 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001316013090
TypeChannel
Username@oblomoffspb
DescriptionПо рекламе @yourbunnytube или [email protected] https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=6763d8004e740947be886a52&registryType=bloggersPermission регистрация в реестре РКН
Created21 April 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/oblomoffspb

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

121,883123,476122,679.57 August 2026 — 123,476 subscribers7 August 2026 — 123,476 subscribers7 August 2026 — 123,428 subscribers8 August 2026 — 123,381 subscribers9 August 2026 — 123,342 subscribers10 August 2026 — 123,301 subscribers11 August 2026 — 123,261 subscribers12 August 2026 — 123,227 subscribers13 August 2026 — 123,200 subscribers14 August 2026 — 123,142 subscribers16 August 2026 — 123,075 subscribers17 August 2026 — 122,994 subscribers18 August 2026 — 122,974 subscribers19 August 2026 — 122,943 subscribers20 August 2026 — 122,915 subscribers22 August 2026 — 122,872 subscribers23 August 2026 — 122,824 subscribers25 August 2026 — 122,790 subscribers26 August 2026 — 122,761 subscribers27 August 2026 — 122,715 subscribers28 August 2026 — 122,694 subscribers29 August 2026 — 122,657 subscribers30 August 2026 — 122,623 subscribers30 August 2026 — 122,572 subscribers31 August 2026 — 122,540 subscribers1 September 2026 — 122,508 subscribers3 September 2026 — 122,486 subscribers4 September 2026 — 122,419 subscribers7 September 2026 — 122,299 subscribers10 September 2026 — 122,182 subscribers12 September 2026 — 122,113 subscribers14 September 2026 — 122,119 subscribers16 September 2026 — 122,156 subscribers18 September 2026 — 122,107 subscribers24 September 2026 — 121,883 subscribers7 August 202624 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 49 days, net -1,593. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 121,644–123,715 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Sept 2026, 21:37121,883-224
18 Sept 2026, 15:41122,107-49
16 Sept 2026, 04:19122,156+37
14 Sept 2026, 09:41122,119+6
12 Sept 2026, 17:37122,113-69
10 Sept 2026, 20:42122,182-117
7 Sept 2026, 20:35122,299-120
4 Sept 2026, 18:21122,419-67
3 Sept 2026, 00:38122,486-22
1 Sept 2026, 20:16122,508-32
31 Aug 2026, 20:04122,540-32
30 Aug 2026, 23:16122,572-51
30 Aug 2026, 02:15122,623-34
29 Aug 2026, 02:36122,657-37
28 Aug 2026, 05:34122,694-21
27 Aug 2026, 03:54122,715-46
26 Aug 2026, 01:44122,761-29
25 Aug 2026, 04:22122,790-34
23 Aug 2026, 23:14122,824-48
22 Aug 2026, 03:59122,872first reading

Engagement

485 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 122 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.00%
avg views ÷ 121,883 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,760
269 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.62%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
270
of 485 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026
Posts held485 (4 August 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Views total2,624,470
Reactions total42,567
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Sept 2026, 22:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,560
Videos
≈2,750
Links
≈769

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2h 36m
Average length
47s

Measured directly from 198 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

78,375 reactions across 484 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣33,10842.2%
🔥15,33419.6%
❤11,05314.1%
👍10,54513.5%
💯4,4215.64%
🫡3,3264.24%
👌3240.413%
🆒2640.337%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 484 of the 485 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 78,375 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 485 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
0.825%
4 of 485 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
4
posts carrying an erid · 3 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
9,630
over 4 measured posts
Median views · rest
10,000
over 480 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzqxAkynj219 August 202626 September 2026
2SDnjeFnjTy131 August 202631 August 2026
2VtzqwfWiRA113 September 202613 September 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 485 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 27 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

27 Sept 2026, 20:18 UTC≈1,980 views27 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

🤣15👍4💯3🔥3❤2

27 Sept 2026, 19:05 UTC≈3,330 views97 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🤣77❤9🔥5🫡4👍2

27 Sept 2026, 16:55 UTC≈4,870 views75 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🤣56💯10❤6👍3

27 Sept 2026, 16:18 UTC≈5,330 views121 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Ну какава красата

🔥86👍17❤16🫡2

27 Sept 2026, 15:20 UTC≈5,940 views93 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video

Блин. Мне кажется тут некоторые видосы - иишные

🤣61❤12🫡9👍6💯3🔥2

27 Sept 2026, 15:20 UTC≈5,620 views108 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🔥84👍15❤9

27 Sept 2026, 15:14 UTC≈5,560 views102 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🔥79👍16❤7

27 Sept 2026, 13:42 UTC≈6,550 views95 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Пожирел чутка. Расчехляю дорожку. Пишите ваши вопросы!!! Общаемся в комментариях!!

👍57🔥25❤8🤣4🫡1

27 Sept 2026, 13:03 UTC≈6,830 views208 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Когда из мебели в хате тока ты сам.

🤣122❤32👍24🫡22🔥8

27 Sept 2026, 07:35 UTC≈8,180 views337 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🤣261💯37❤19👍10🔥10

26 Sept 2026, 19:13 UTC≈8,740 views84 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

❤41👍25🔥18

26 Sept 2026, 18:20 UTC≈8,690 views136 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

На третий день появилась!

❤70🔥42👍17🫡3🤣2🆒2

Showing the 12 most recent of 485 posts we hold for @oblomoffspb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

25 Sept 2026, 10:38 UTCAnonymous Poll1,840 voters approx.

Делаем ставки. Начала ли расти плесень в коробке?

  1. Думаю да52%
  2. Думаю нет9%
  3. Я анчоус я не шарю45%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

25 Sept 2026, 07:05 UTCAnonymous Poll3,360 voters approx.

На чем смотрите мой контент?

  1. Телефон59%
  2. Планшет8%
  3. Комп/ноут35%
  4. Телек19%
  5. На анчоусе14%

The shares total 135%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

12 Sept 2026, 11:12 UTCAnonymous Poll2,710 voters approx.

Мужики, какая женщина привлекательнее, при прочих равных?

  1. Красивое лицо. Но нету попы и не умеет готовить.34%
  2. Отлично готовит, но страшновата и без попы.11%
  3. Шикарная попа, но лицо на троечку и не умеет готовить.22%
  4. Я женщина, покажите результаты опроса этих мужланоф!40%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

10 Sept 2026, 13:06 UTCAnonymous Poll2,890 voters approx.

Разыгрываем

  1. Сувид26%
  2. Вакуматор21%
  3. Планетарник32%
  4. Мясорубка16%
  5. Сковородка16%
  6. Баночку анчоусов29%

The shares total 140%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

27 Aug 2026, 12:21 UTCAnonymous Poll2,530 voters approx.

Крабовый салат

  1. С рисом. По канону. Нажористо.45%
  2. Без риса. Рис от нищеты клали.49%
  3. Анчоусы кладу11%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

5 Aug 2026, 17:27 UTCAnonymous Poll2,740 voters approx.

Хаваете на-ходу?

  1. Да47%
  2. Нет53%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 485 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 27 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Славный Друже Oblomoff” (@oblomoffspb), 121,883 subscribers as measured 24 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oblomoffspb.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.