Channel
@ob_nal
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
32,720subscribers
-59 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001360616183 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ob_nal |
| Description | Здесь вы научитесь работать с деньгами Связь со мной: @NameHolder Консультация от 30 т.р. |
| Created | 6 October 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ob_nal |
Real estate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 43% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @ob_nal20/18326 Nov 2023, 07:10 UTC | @ob_nal/2543 · this entry6 Nov 2023, 07:30 UTC | 1.00 | 20 minutes |
| @ob_nal/2544 · this entry7 Nov 2023, 07:10 UTC | @ob_nal20/18337 Nov 2023, 07:10 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @ob_nal/2546 · this entry9 Nov 2023, 02:00 UTC | @ob_nal20/18359 Nov 2023, 03:00 UTC | 1.00 | 60 minutes |
| @ob_nal/2549 · this entry14 Nov 2023, 07:10 UTC | @ob_nal20/183814 Nov 2023, 07:10 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @ob_nal/2551 · this entry16 Nov 2023, 07:10 UTC | @ob_nal20/184218 Nov 2023, 20:49 UTC | 1.00 | 3 days |
| @ob_nal/2552 · this entry17 Nov 2023, 07:10 UTC | @ob_nal20/184118 Nov 2023, 20:36 UTC | 1.00 | 37 hours |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @ob_nal20 | 15 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @ob_nal20 (8–7) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 8 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 18 comparable posts for this entry, running 2 November 2023 to 4 December 2023. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @ob_nal20. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 6 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:55 | 32,720 | -7 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:12 | 32,727 | -7 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:36 | 32,734 | -15 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:04 | 32,749 | -8 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:32 | 32,757 | -11 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:09 | 32,768 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:21 | 32,771 | -7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:32 | 32,778 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:32 | 32,779 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 November 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 December 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
354 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 215 | 60.7% | |
| 🤯 | 68 | 19.2% | |
| 🔥 | 58 | 16.4% | |
| 👎 | 8 | 2.26% | |
| 🤮 | 5 | 1.41% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 354reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 November 2023 to 4 December 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Говорят, декабрь - время подведения итогов На протяжении многих лет вы остаетесь со мной, доверяете моим рекомендациям, делитесь своими историями и поддерживаете. Многие из вас со мной с первых дней основания канала, который недавно заблокировали, но несмотря на это вы нашли способ остаться и продолжаете переходить на мои новые ресурсы. Я ценю это и благодарен каждому за вклад и участие в жизнь канала. Долгое время…
🤯66👍48🔥28🤮4
Как обманывают на рынке недвижимости и получают хату на халяву Недавно написал человек и рассказал такую схему. Одна микрофинансовая организация решила сорвать куш и стала мелким шрифтом прописывать в договорах залог объекта недвижимости заемщика. В качестве доказательства возврата средств просили всю информацию по квартире и втихаря оформляли на нее залог. Человеку давали бабки под огромные проценты, а затем, когд…
👍14🔥7👎1
Почему могут быть проблемы с оптимизацией? На сегодняшний день оптимизаторы реально круто прокачались, а дилетанты и бездари ушли с рынка. И фискалам реально трудно вычислить хороший зашив и подтянуть предпринимателя. Это факт. И множество грамотных бизнесменов, которые нашли компетентных партнеров вполне уверенно себя чувствуют и зашивают столько, сколько им надо. Обратите внимание на слово грамотных. Ибо, как уже…
👍5👎2
Варианты отрабатывали счета припомощи банковских работников Недавно у меня был пост «Как добыть бабки просто так?» После него мне написал один подписчик и поделился годной инфой. Разрешил опубликовать, но анонимно. Тема интересная. Если что- в ней уже работает не так, уверен, при хороших мозгах докрутить можно. Вникайте. «К дополнению к крайнему посту расскажу еще вариант, который придумал я (но понятно, что не п…
👍11🔥4👎1
Photo, posted without a caption
👍4👎1
Обнал – хорошо или плохо? Недавно как-то беседовали с одним опытным кешевиком за обнал. Свалились в тему хорошо это или плохо. И вот, что он сказал. «Когда я для себя решил, что не нацелен по жизни трудиться «на дядю» и буду этим дядей становиться сам, а также озвучил это своей семье, была драма. Были слезы. В итоге моя семья на полгода прекратила общение со мной. Выдержали своего рода карантин. Аргументы были сле…
👍20👎1
Все про левые сим После постов про сим карты мне написал подписчик и предложил поделиться информацией, так как это его профессиональная сфера деятельности. Пообщались, было интересно. Как всегда делюсь. Сим-карты это – товар. И на одного человека можно повесить сотни симок. Спрос на симки всегда есть, соответственно, есть и предложение. Законно это или незаконно? Нет, но никто за этим не следит и никого не наказы…
👍18
Директор (слева) и бухгалтер ( справа) идут в налоговую😁
👍14🔥5
Что стоит знать про выемку? Допустим, в отношении вас принято решение о ВНП. Налоговики истребовали документы, вы им дали не весь комплект или копии. Но они допросили ваш персонал и те что-то слили. Разводить на базар фискалы умеют. Ну или им тупо что-то не понравилось в документах. Если скрываетесь – выемка будет однозначно. Еще шанс словить выемку – если инспектору просто подумалось, что вы – налоговый схемарь. …
👍10
Конфликты – конфликтами, кризис – кризисом, а работать надо Учитывая то, что в России постоянно жопа, кризис, инфляция и падает население, стремительно самоликвидируется уже не первый год бизнес, делать дела становится все сложнее, выдерживают не все. Я много общаюсь с предпринимателями и такого количества жалоб раньше не слышал. И это не только моя статистика. И если те, у кого есть хоть какие-то обороты, продолж…
👍9
Как защитить свою сим? Расскажу про методы защиты от схем по уводу карты, которые описал выше. Не оставляй нигде в интернете свои паспортные данные, особенно при регистрациях на разных сайтах. Исключение — покупка электронных билетов на поезд и самолет на доверенных сайтах, а-ля авиакомпаний и РЖД, и регистрация в финансовых сервисах. Покупай SIM-карты только в фирменных офисах операторов. Иначе можно купить…
👍6
Твоя сим-карта – твоя уязвимость Я тут писал, что не надо выключать телефоны, привязанные к банковскому счету. Ибо, стоит кому-либо получить доступ к SIM, как все сервисы, где нужна смска — от мессенджеров до интернет-банков тупо угонят. Кстати, да, воруют все: и все соцсети, и почты, и мессенджеры. Но есть еще способы вас обчистить. Одним из наиболее распространенных видов стало получение дубликата симки у опер…
🔥7👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ob_nal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 26,507 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Обнальщик” (@ob_nal), 32,720 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ob_nal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.