Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
13 measurements spanning 50 days, net +20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,502–3,531 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 06:17
3,525
-3
12 Sept 2026, 16:38
3,528
+3
8 Sept 2026, 14:56
3,525
+10
3 Sept 2026, 13:41
3,515
+9
28 Aug 2026, 05:56
3,506
-7
22 Aug 2026, 14:55
3,513
+7
19 Aug 2026, 09:27
3,506
-2
16 Aug 2026, 06:26
3,508
+3
12 Aug 2026, 10:54
3,505
-3
9 Aug 2026, 10:31
3,508
+2
6 Aug 2026, 18:00
3,506
+1
6 Aug 2026, 05:46
3,505
no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:38
3,505
first reading
Engagement
28 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 28 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
434 reactions across 22 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
320
73.7%
🕊
68
15.7%
😢
30
6.91%
🤔
13
3.00%
👀
2
0.461%
👌
1
0.23%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 600 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 28 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @o_thg. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 28 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
3.57%
1 of 28 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
812
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
762
over 27 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2W5zFJoH89w
1
4 August 2026
4 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
РАЗВЕ В НАУКЕ НЕ СУЩЕСТВУЕТ СВОИХ ПРОБЛЕМ?
Разве в науке нет ошибок и споров? – Все так! В науке есть и мифы, и даже свои дураки с красными дипломами! Но вопрос не в том, насколько более-менее оформившаяся сегодня научная картина мира верна, а в том, что «предыдущие версии» мировоззрения, представлений о мире в мифе и в античной метафизике неверны! Еще раз это подчеркнем: Проблема не в том, что в научной картине мира…
«Конечно, многие христиане будут догматически настаивать, что слово получило свое полное и окончательное выражение в Библии. Но мы должны сразу же заметить, что это заявление – поскольку оно ограничивает откровение прошлым или первоначальным временем – …не принимает полностью христианское значение грехопадения. Оно ищет непорочную форму слова, чистый момент откровения в его первозданном и вечном смысле, незамутненный…
«Разумеется, что такой Христос, который является просто Богом, не уникален для христианства, поскольку он не обнаруживает признаков конкретного сошествия Бога в человеческую плоть. Это сошествие не может быть вполне понятым, если только оно не понимается как реальное изменение самого Бога; причем происходит это изменение окончательно и бесповоротно везде, где есть история и жизнь. Пока христианский Бог продолжает пон…
Илья Гриц и пророчества. Разбор книги прор. Аввакума. Искупление в иудейкой теологии
https://youtu.be/oAqGaSF76bI?si=Wq5wCse4kuoeyXlP (ЮТУБ)
#библеистика
Лиза, милая! Милостей тебе Господа и сил :))
зато теперь вы понимаете меня :))) Ну, я про свое отношение к биомассам в инернете, к этим всем, кого именую идиотами и быдлом. "как в говно ступила". Эт точно
https://t.me/konofalsh/448
#цивилизация
#личное
Стиралка кирдык...
Оказывается, мастеров в округе нет (нет и всё!). У меня корейская – Самсунг. Напомню, то воды у меня на участке нет – поэтому привезенную в бидонах я просто ковшом заливал в сектор для порошка. Сегодня заложил стирку, засыпал порошок, начал заливать, а она трещит. Снял фильтр, почистил – все равно трещит, вроде как моторчик. И потом загорается сообщение об ошибке.
Что делать? Искать мастера в Воро…
ПРИШЕЛ И ТАКОЙ ВОТ КОММЕНТАРИЙ ЧИТАТЕЛЯ
А я сразу вспомнил слова великого апостола Павла:
«Ибо перед Богом мы и есть аромат Христа, доступный обонянию как спасаемых, так и погибающих. И для одних мы запах смерти, который умерщвляет, а для других мы запах жизни, который оживляет. И кто еще способен на такое?» (2Кор 2:15-16)
#личное
Феномен библейского (царского) мессианизма
В Писании (особ. в текстах эпохи Первого Храма, т.е. в текстах эпохи Иудейского Царства) мы встречаем многочисленные «высокие» эпитеты о «мессии» из дома Давида – так именовался династический царь Иудеи. Достаточно прочесть Псалмы 2, 71, 109, 88, 44, чтобы убедиться, что царская власть воспринималась как божественное начало в народе. Именно этот земной царь именовался Мессие…
Почему в сюжете с Аэндорской волшебницей (1Цар 26:7-25) именно «дух Самуила» оказывается носителем знания о будущем?
Такой вопрос я получил от одного из подписчиков: не означает ли это, что будущее существует и т.д.?
На самом деле этот сюжет нужно рассматривать очень внимательно в целом, т.е. весь сюжет, а не его кусок.
Во-первых, поводом обращения Саула были глубокие сомнения. Армия Израиля уже несла большие потери,…
Никола Минюхин. Анатомия догмы // Записки Нижегородского религиоведа // https://vk.ru/wall-181155295_230 (05.08.2026)
Рекомендую статью по ссылке!
Кстати, очень верно подмечено, что в основе всех решений в СССР был «догматизм» (что подтверждает мой тезис «коммунизм – это религия») – такой же упрямый и фанатичный, как у тупых традиционалистов у нас, в христианстве. Везде в мире научные исследования уже были свободны…
Начало 👆
5. Ключевая идея автора в том, что Бог «прежний» после воплощения полностью перестал существовать. Исходным постулатом является принятие аксиомы о том, что изначально Бог был «полностью трансцендентным». Я же считаю, что Бог никогда не был абсолютом и совершенно трансцендентным. Уже породив Логос вовне Себя как «другого Бога», Отец о-предéлился Логосом! И на протяжении всех миллиардов лет существования внепо…
👍5😢1
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @o_thg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“"Отверженный строителями камень..." с "проклятием Кассандры" на плечах (o.thg)” (@o_thg), 3,525 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/o_thg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.