Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for О подарках

Channel

О подарках

@o_podarkah

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

363subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003228290151
TypeChannel
Username@o_podarkah
CreatedBetween 1 October 2025 and 9 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/o_podarkah

Growth

358363360.57 Aug 2026, 19:06 — 358 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 23:52 — 363 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 06:32 — 363 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 19:068 Aug 2026, 06:32
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 357–364 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 06:32363no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:52363+5
7 Aug 2026, 19:06358first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 9 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
32
Videos
5
Links
4

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
17m 01s
Average length
3m 24s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

811 reactions across 19 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
32840.4%
🔥15919.6%
👍12615.5%
🤝263.21%
❤‍🔥253.08%
👏253.08%
🍓242.96%
😍182.22%
💯101.23%
🤣101.23%
💔70.863%
💘70.863%
🥰70.863%
👌50.617%
🗿50.617%
🙏50.617%
🌚40.493%
🕊40.493%
🦄30.37%
20.247%
6 further kinds111.36%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 811reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 9 January 2026 to 6 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10,028
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 19 we hold a reading for · 37%
Most on one post
5,050
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @o_podarkah. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 January 2026 to 6 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Jul 2026, 18:59 UTC768 views65 reactions2,560 Starsread 8 August 2026

https://vm.tiktok.com/ZGd9XJ7Sp/ Новый клип🎁, созданный для конкурса Павла Дурова на тему Digital freedom 🕊️

32🔥18👏13❤‍🔥1🦄1

1 Jun 2026, 08:18 UTC≈2,250 views70 reactions5,050 Starsread 8 August 2026
Video

Moon Cat English version

34🔥18👍11❤‍🔥4🍾1👏1🥰1

1 Jun 2026, 08:18 UTC≈3,970 views59 reactions81 Starsread 8 August 2026
Video

Moon Cat Русская версия

🔥2618👍12🍓2👏1

19 May 2026, 18:39 UTC≈2,420 views109 reactions544 Starsread 8 August 2026
Video

🎁 Первый клип в истории телеграм-подарков! Огромная благодарность Сарре @sarra и Катарине @detochka — главным героиням 😍 а также @mooncat_girl за реализацию ❤️ Делитесь впечатлениями❤️❤️❤️

48❤‍🔥20😍18🤣6💔5🔥4🗿3🌚2

30 Mar 2026, 17:27 UTC≈8,720 views113 reactions704 Starsread 8 August 2026
Video

Эта серия создавалась больше месяца. Десятки часов подготовки, сотни просмотренных профилей, бесконечные детали, которые собирались буквально по крупицам. Каждый персонаж в этом мультфильме — из вселенной Telegram-подарков. Некоторые образы вдохновлены реальными людьми. Некоторые детали — коллекциями, которые вы собираете. Поэтому не удивляйтесь, если вдруг узнаете знакомый силуэт, подборку подарков… или даже самог

52🍓22🔥19💘7🤣4🌭2👍2🕊2

28 Feb 2026, 20:35 UTC≈9,250 views128 reactions1,080 Starsread 8 August 2026
Video

Выражая благодарность создателям подарков и тех эмоций, что они нам всем дарят, у меня появилась идея оживить вселенную Телеграм и выразить любовь к самому прекрасному из них - к Moon Cat 🎄 Эта первая серия создана с любовью и вниманием к деталям @mooncat_girl при технической поддержке @evgeny3300 Ждем отзывы. Серии будут выкладываться в этом чате 🎄 https://t.me/chat_mooncats 🎄 созданном для всех хороших людей 🥳

63👍35🤝22🔥4🌚2🗿2

26 Jan 2026, 11:28 UTC≈3,100 views33 reactions9 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

В завершение — краткое описание портфеля @mooncats: 1. Флагманский, самый сильный подарок в своём биржевом варианте — Pepe. 2. «Подарок в подарке»: Mooncats, Musk, Holy Grenade. 3. Золотые монохромы. 4. Золотые предметы, чаще 1/1, на фоне French Violet — фоне, на котором, согласно цветовому кругу, золото должно смотреться особенно хорошо. 5. Коллекция из 400+ доменов .ton. 6. Золотые предметы на midnight blue.

🔥225👏4🕊2

26 Jan 2026, 11:28 UTC≈1,730 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Какие бы ошибки я выделил, которые могут сопутствовать диверсификации? 1. Перекос в объёме одного инструмента в портфеле. Создаёт излишние риски в случае несрабатывания идеи. 2. «Диверсификация ради диверсификации», когда различные активы приобретаются не на основе сильной идеи, а просто для разнообразия. 3. Увлечение покупками — сам процесс покупки чего-либо достаточно приятный, доставляет удовольствие, и в попыт

🔥95

26 Jan 2026, 11:28 UTC≈1,060 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Теперь к функциональному составу портфеля. Коллекция vs «запчасти». Приобретая большое число однотипных предметов, мы можем внезапно для себя обнаружить, что сформировали коллекцию на основе какого-либо принципа, хотя изначально предполагали только набрать «запчасти» (спасибо за ёмкое определение @millionair) для тех, кто придёт в подарки после нас и будет формировать собственные собрания. Здесь встаёт вопрос: углуб

👍10👏21

26 Jan 2026, 11:28 UTC847 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Итак, я бы определил вложения в 3 сериала как одну идею — у них, по сути, один и тот же драйвер для роста. Аналогично и собрание определённых моделей (например, золотых) на разном фоне было бы тоже одной идеей, независимо от числа фонов. Исключением, самостоятельными сильными идеями могли бы выступать те фоны, где уже имеется сильное сообщество и поддержка, как у midnight blue, black, amber. Вообще, наличие сильного

🔥8🥰6👍2

26 Jan 2026, 11:27 UTC959 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Итак, у нас есть спокойная индексная составляющая из флорных подарков. Что-то да заработаем)) Теперь мы можем добавить к нашему портфелю отдельные идеи. Мы анализируем рынок на предмет особого спроса — где люди готовы переплачивать выше флора и делать биржевой подарок коллекционным. Устойчивый особый спрос — это тренд: подарки выросли опережающими темпами, и мы рассчитываем на продолжение этой динамики. В случае если

👍74👏2

26 Jan 2026, 11:27 UTC715 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Исходя из этого, наполнение портфеля должно происходить этими двумя категориями. Это довольно сильно различающиеся друг от друга классы товаров, как стандартизированные акции и картины, например, но и те и другие имеют право на существование и должны быть в портфеле. Итак, у нас есть индексная составляющая (около флора). Чем она хороша? Во-первых, такие подарки — основной бенефициар денежных потоков и роста аудитори

👍95👏2

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @o_podarkah. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 695,984 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“О подарках” (@o_podarkah), 363 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/o_podarkah.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.