Channel
@o_ml7
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2,338subscribers
+53 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002674973756 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @o_ml7 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/o_ml7 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:57 | 2,338 | +25 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:11 | 2,313 | +28 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:52 | 2,285 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:07 | 2,285 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (10 May 2026 – 27 July 2026) |
| Views total | 8,961 |
| Reactions total | 164 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:43 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
233 reactions across 16 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5870645300590288865 | 79 | 33.9% | |
| custom 5870888515998325200 | 77 | 33.0% | |
| custom 5992199545151295755 | 33 | 14.2% | |
| custom 6026053890422609910 | 23 | 9.87% | |
| custom 5870980909334796350 | 21 | 9.01% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 233reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 May 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @o_ml7. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 May 2026 to 27 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
هناك قنوات تحذف البوت و تضيفه اكثر من عشر مرات لما اراجع القنوات حتى اضيف يسبب عليا خربطة و تعب خلص ضيف البوت و اتركه من نزل الاعلان ادخل قناة الدعم و شوف قناتك بايه مجلد 📂 لو ما لقيتها كلمني
custom 587064530059028886511custom 58709809093347963503
من ناصر أهل الضلالة أو روّج لهم فقد خالف سبيل أهل السنة. ﴿ وَلَا تَعَاوَنُوا عَلَى الْإِثْمِ وَالْعُدْوَانِ ﴾ وسيتم ذكر أسماء الدعوم المخالفة في هذا المنشور . دعم مسك الختام دعم طيبة دعم زاد دعم مسلمة دعم وردية دعم لطف دعم الريان دعم النور دعم سويم دعم مجلد سلفي دعم أنشار دعم هاني دعم قوائم سلفية دعم الشايڨى
custom 587088851599832520017custom 59921995451512957553
والتحذيرُ -بقلمِ " مريم بنت عمر- " ماضٍ بإذن الله، كنتُ ولا أزال أحذِّر، ولن يصدَّني عن ذلك شيء.
custom 587088851599832520013custom 58709809093347963506custom 58706453005902888655custom 60260538904226099102
لقد أفنى العلماءُ أعمارَهم في التحذير من الخوارج والإخوان وأهلِ البدع، وإقامةِ الحجة عليهم، وبيانِ باطلهم، وأنتم تخالفون سبيلهم بدعمكم لهم طمعًا في الأرقام والمشاهدات. حسبنا الله ونعم الوكيل.
custom 58706453005902888659custom 58708885159983252005custom 60260538904226099103custom 59921995451512957552
إلى متى يا أصحاب القنوات؟ إلى متى هذا التغافل؟ متى تتقون الله في أنفسكم، وتكفون عن دعم من ترون أنهم على باطل، طمعًا في الأعداد والمشاهدات، وتحت شعار: "نشر العلم"؟ أما علمتم أن كثرة الأتباع لا تُغني عن الحق شيئًا؟ وأن العدد الذي تتوهمون أنه نفعٌ لكم، لا يسمن ولا يغني من حق، بل قد يكون وبالًا عليكم إن كان ثمنه التنازل عن المبدأ. متى تصحون؟ متى تدركون أن الحق لا يُوزن بالأرقام، وإنما يُوزن بالاتباع والصدق مع الله؟
custom 58706453005902888658custom 60260538904226099105custom 59921995451512957553custom 58708885159983252002
الدعم ضااااااال ضااال شئتم أم أبيتم، وواضحٌ عيانًا من إعلاناته، فما يحتاج إلى إقامة أدلة.
custom 58706453005902888655custom 58708885159983252003custom 60260538904226099103custom 59921995451512957552
نعيد و نكرر دعم الريان و الدعومات التابعة له خارجي اخواني دعم ضال لا تغركم كثرة العدد شو نفع المتابعين عن طريق دعم خراجي اخواني ؟!!!!.........
custom 58706453005902888658custom 58708885159983252006custom 59921995451512957555custom 60260538904226099102
التواصل فقط للي ما وجد قناته بالمجلد الي بدهم يشتركوا بالدعم فقط بضيفُ البوت مشرف
@mlc2bot تواصل
رح احاول اعمل لكم تواصل لكن فضلاً ارجوكم يكون السؤال محدود
custom 58708885159983252006custom 59921995451512957553
لِمَن يبحث عن قنواتٍ سلفيةٍ نافعة هذه قائمةٌ تضمُّ عددًا من القنوات https://t.me/addlist/OUYPKqTIS0pmOTBk ١ -
custom 58706453005902888652custom 58708885159983252001
لِمَن يبحث عن قنواتٍ سلفيةٍ نافعة هذه قائمةٌ تضمُّ عددًا من القنوات https://t.me/addlist/eXrQ4P0rUgthYzNk ٢ -
custom 58708885159983252003custom 58706453005902888652
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @o_ml7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 215,079 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@o_ml7 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“دعم مجاهد أثري” (@o_ml7), 2,338 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/o_ml7.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.