Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

О! Марго

@o_margo

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,440subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001391654327
TypeChannel
Username@o_margo
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/o_margo

Growth

1,4401,4461,4436 August 2026 — 1,442 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,442 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,446 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,443 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,440 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,439–1,447 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 22:281,440-3
9 Aug 2026, 14:141,443-3
6 Aug 2026, 19:411,446+4
6 Aug 2026, 07:481,442no change
6 Aug 2026, 06:391,442first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
32.1%
avg views ÷ 1,440 subscribers
Avg views / post
462
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.63%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 8 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held8 (30 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total3,697
Reactions total245
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 07:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 11:36 UTC≈201 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

5 Aug 2026, 07:57 UTC≈267 views33 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

спонтанные каникулы в родном Екатике 🥛 а как проходит ваше лето??

4 Aug 2026, 17:22 UTC≈386 views40 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

погнали конкурс! в пятницу выйдет песня «дуракам везёт». она появилась необычным образом — с помощью карт таро 🤭 выпал «дурак» и появилась идея для трека, прикиньте потому придумалось разыграть колоду метафорических карт с картинками из мультфильмов Миядзаки (это моя любовь) + видеооткрытку, где спою песню и сделаю вам раскладик участвовать тут 😏

3 Aug 2026, 14:04 UTC≈423 views49 reactionsread 6 August 2026

вам самым первым запалю обложку песни, которая уже в эту пятницу!! жмем пресейв и просим всех друзей за компанию нажать!

31 Jul 2026, 17:57 UTC≈607 views39 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

а вот как звучит новая песенка в акустике! «дуракам везёт» уже в следующую пятницу 🤭 скоро будет пресейв, и я попрошу вас плотно понажимать на кнопку спасибо моей подружке Алине Маркиной, с которой мы написали этот трек и сняли этот видосик

31 Jul 2026, 09:06 UTC≈587 views26 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

30 Jul 2026, 13:55 UTC≈606 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026

собрала любимый маршрут пешочком по Москве 🏃‍♂️ а какие места любите вы??

30 Jul 2026, 13:55 UTC≈620 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @kluchtvPhoto

Шагаем по Москве с О! Марго ✨ Запускаем новую рубрику! Изучаем столицу с маршрутами от музыкантов, актеров, артистов и писателей! Сегодня прогуливаемся по Марьиной Роще с О! Марго — с современной поп-певицей родом из Екатеринбурга, но, как она сама подмечает, с уже устоявшимся синдромом Москвички! Часто задумывалась, откуда появилось такое красивое название района, так что поделюсь с вами: в XVII веке это была лес

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @o_margo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 191,951 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“О! Марго” (@o_margo), 1,440 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/o_margo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.