Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for It's mine

Channel

It's mine

@o8w21

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,619subscribers

-78 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002632731182
TypeChannel
Username@o8w21
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/o8w21

Growth

1,6191,6971,6587 August 2026 — 1,697 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,697 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,696 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,684 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,675 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,663 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,652 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,640 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,629 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,619 subscribers7 August 202628 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 21 days, net -78. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,607–1,709 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 17:051,619-10
25 Aug 2026, 17:161,629-11
23 Aug 2026, 00:081,640-12
19 Aug 2026, 18:221,652-11
16 Aug 2026, 21:561,663-12
13 Aug 2026, 04:041,675-9
10 Aug 2026, 12:171,684-12
7 Aug 2026, 22:041,696-1
7 Aug 2026, 21:021,697no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:081,697first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.15%
avg views ÷ 1,619 subscribers
Avg views / post
51.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (26 January 20266 August 2026)
Views total51
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 21:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

625 reactions across 16 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 589569904741869842515925.4%
custom 586830401083802138012620.2%
custom 58686887540083974949014.4%
🗿8113.0%
custom 50264177542703362947912.6%
custom 5895363442969156220355.60%
custom 5895454466211059891284.48%
🍓274.32%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 625reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 January 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7,678
across the posts below
Posts paid on
18
of 19 we hold a reading for · 95%
Most on one post
1,640
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @o8w21. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 January 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

13 May 2026, 23:37 UTC≈1,370 views0 reactions14 Starsread 7 August 2026

جربو هذا البوت وحطو بي تون او نجوم او مطورات شحنو ولعبو وجربو واستكشفو وراح تدعولي بوت تستفاد منه مطورات هوايه يفيدكم💋

Signed lucifer الشيخ...

13 May 2026, 23:36 UTC≈1,320 views0 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026

https://t.me/epic_gift_bot/app?startapp=ref_USiaDQ

Signed lucifer الشيخ...

16 Feb 2026, 17:50 UTC≈2,770 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

حبايبي نزلت كل المشرفين راح اترك القناة فتره ل اسباب خاصه وبس احبكم🤍

custom 589569904741869842521

Signed lucifer الشيخ...

28 Jan 2026, 12:07 UTC≈5,440 views69 reactions1,640 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

BEAUTIFUL AND🤩 DAMNED🐾

custom 502641775427033629439custom 589569904741869842514custom 586868875400839749413🍓3

Signed lucifer الشيخ...🥃

28 Jan 2026, 11:58 UTC≈4,030 views76 reactions1,000 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

‏"لم يكُن حُبًا من⁩ طرف⁩ٍ واحد أحببتُك حُب⁩ّ الطرَفين وحدي!"

🗿57custom 589569904741869842513custom 58686887540083974946

Signed lucifer الشيخ...🥃

28 Jan 2026, 11:31 UTC≈3,110 views27 reactions400 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

"You are mine." "And I am yours." "أنت لي." 🤩 "وأنا لك."

custom 502641775427033629413custom 58683040108380213807custom 58956990474186984256🗿1

Signed lucifer الشيخ...🥃

28 Jan 2026, 11:30 UTC≈2,340 views29 reactions100 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

С тех пор, как дни свели нас вместе, я полностью осознал,насколько человек может быть лекарством для души.

custom 586830401083802138016custom 58956990474186984256custom 58953634429691562205custom 58686887540083974942

Signed lucifer الشيخ...🥃

28 Jan 2026, 08:32 UTC≈2,240 views50 reactions500 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

You said love shouldn’t feel Like a record stuck on repeat Your words were soft but never stayed They faded out like background noise I fell in love with the silence Now every song sounds like Every street feels out of time We were never meant to last Just long enough to feel like mine🐾

custom 589569904741869842520custom 589536344296915622014custom 586830401083802138013custom 58954544662110598913

Signed lucifer الشيخ...🥃

28 Jan 2026, 08:08 UTC≈2,900 views54 reactions620 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ما غابَ عن العينِ لن يَغيبَ عن الرّوحِ أبداً فالأرواحُ لا تَنسَى ما استَوطنَها.

custom 586830401083802138021🗿10custom 50264177542703362948🍓6custom 58686887540083974944custom 58954544662110598912custom 58956990474186984252custom 58953634429691562201

Signed lucifer الشيخ...🥃

27 Jan 2026, 23:54 UTC≈2,850 views45 reactions888 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

فأنكِ نجمتي في عِتمة ليّلي فلا ليل دون النجُوم ولا انا مِن دونكِ انتِ .

custom 589569904741869842524🍓10custom 58953634429691562207custom 58954544662110598913custom 58686887540083974941

Signed lucifer الشيخ...🥃

27 Jan 2026, 05:07 UTC≈2,440 views34 reactions150 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

أتعَمقُ بالتَفكيرُ بكِ فأنسى العالَم بأكملهُ.

custom 586868875400839749423🗿3custom 58683040108380213803custom 58956990474186984252custom 50264177542703362941custom 58953634429691562201custom 58954544662110598911

Signed lucifer الشيخ...🥃

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @o8w21. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“It's mine” (@o8w21), 1,619 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/o8w21.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.