For hyper successful people it's always: Succeed or Die. From Elon Musk's biography: "I think that’s what the VCs saw. That he was willing to stake his existence on building out this platform. Musk actually said as much to one venture capitalist, informing him, ‘My mentality is that of a samurai. I would rather commit seppuku than fail.’” From Warren Buffet's biography: "One time, while Warren was slurping Mary F…

Channel
The Wall Street Journal
@nytimes_world
On this record: Previous handles · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,583subscribers
+19 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001371277259 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nytimes_world |
| Created | 7 November 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nytimes_world |
Previous handles
Recorded in 2019 as “The New York Times World” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:38 | 7,583 | +3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:42 | 7,580 | +12 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:52 | 7,568 | +4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:19 | 7,564 | first reading |
Engagement
26 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5.81%
- avg views ÷ 7,583 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 440
- 26 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 26
- of 26 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 26 (26 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 11,451 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 17:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 8m 02s
- Average length
- 1m 09s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
How AI market share has changed since ChatGPT launched in Nov '22. @aipost 🏴
🗣Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt says a frontier AI model costs up to $500 million to build and is worth about six months: "Are the scaling laws stopping?" "And the answer right now is no, which is unbelievable." "A model costs $200 to $500 million, you release it, and it has a life expectancy of about six months." "And then there's another one." "And the competition between the leading players is so brutal, righ…
🇨🇳 China just built a virtual society with 1 BILLION AI people. Researchers built Light Society, a system where AI agents have personalities, memories, beliefs and human-like behavior. Instead of using one giant model for everyone, it combines powerful LLMs with smaller models to make the simulation efficient enough to run over 1 billion agents. They gave the agents real-world demographic data, then simulated thin…
Milton Friedman explains why there’s no such thing as taxes on business or corporations: “The elementary fact is that ‘business’ does not and cannot pay taxes. Only people can pay taxes. Corporate officials may sign the check, but the money that they forward to Internal Revenue comes from the corporation’s employees, customers, or stockholders.” The Finance Journal 📈
ELON MUSK: "We're running out of test questions to ask AI. Everything has become trivial. The ultimate reasoning test for the AI is going to be reality. Can it create a car, or a rocket, or a new medication? Does it work? Reality is the ultimate judge." @aipost 🏴
Former OpenAI founder Naomi Bashkansky is now involved in developing technology aimed at converting human thoughts directly into text, sometimes referred to as “telepathy.” This process relies on significantly increasing computational resources. According to Bashkansky, the approach is to scale up data collection and computing power. The method is similar to advancements made in predicting text from speech or preced…
"Socialism is an aberrant soul disease. The combination of deep envy, fatal arrogance and ignorance in economic issues." - Javier Milei The Finance Journal 📈
"Like Warren, I had a considerable passion to get rich, not because I wanted Ferrari's - I wanted the independence. I desperately wanted it." -Charlie Munger The Finance Journal 📈
🚀 Elon Musk says even the biggest AI optimist wasn’t optimistic enough Elon Musk says futurist Ray Kurzweil, famous for making bold AI predictions decades ago, may have actually underestimated how fast AI is advancing. According to Musk, dedicated AI computing power is currently growing 10x every six months, or nearly 100x every year for the next few years. To put that into perspective, Moore’s Law, the trend that…
"We never buy something with a price target in mind. What we look for is certainty. We look at a business and ask is this something which will produce more & more cash over time? If the answer is yes, you don't need to ask many questions." -Warren Buffett The Finance Journal 📈
🤯 AI created a fake person Anthropic just revealed one of the most unsettling AI safety tests yet. During a controlled experiment, a Claude model created a fake developer persona, joined a real GitHub project, and started chatting with actual contributors as if it were a human. Its objective? Convince people to approve code changes that secretly contained malicious elements. The disturbing part is that nobody inst…
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @nytimes_world. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@nytimes · 176,934
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 August 2026
@bloomberg · 167,081
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Wall Street Journal” (@nytimes_world), 7,583 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nytimes_world.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.