Channel
@nymphblog
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,084subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001909442271 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nymphblog |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nymphblog |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:18 | 1,084 | +2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:02 | 1,082 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:15 | 1,082 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 18 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (18 May 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,081 |
| Reactions total | 98 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 02:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
329 reactions across 13 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 152 | 46.2% | |
| 🕊 | 93 | 28.3% | |
| 🍓 | 84 | 25.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 329reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 18 May 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌟в прошлом месяце попробовала вести парфюмерный календарик чаще всего забывала внести туда аромат дня, но все равно опция оказалась полезной - легко заметить, к чему рука тянулась больше, а какие ароматы не понравились или оказались неносибельными в данное время года например, dries van noten soie malaquais очень понравился на блоттере, но на коже летом ‘задушил’, буду заново тестировать его уже осенью зато парфюм…
❤6🍓2🕊2
🌟начала знакомство с брендом lore выбрала их discovery set из четырех ароматов - лактонная новинка lil softie не зацепила нотами в наборе четыре аромата: sublimity, disfruta, somewhere but nowhere и lovely and little twisted подробнее обо всех ароматах поделюсь чуть позже, но с первого впечатления очень зацепил sublimity - звучит так, будто soleil blanc и beach walk соединили вместе набор нашла тут #perfumes
❤7🕊4🍓1
👝makeup stuff update mac стал моим самым любимым брендом на данный момент. в этот раз я взяла: фиксатор fix+ - мой любимейший фиксатор из всех, которые я пробовала. отлично справляется со своими задачами, мелко распыляет средство, не имеет запаха, а главное - очень экономичен в расходе, одной баночки мне хватает примерно на год гелевый карандаш для глаз в оттенке incorruptible - впереди у меня много мероприятий, п…
❤12🍓2🕊1
🌟не могу налюбоваться своей мини-коллекцией le labo на полке даже летом по вечерам мне нравится наносить vanille 44 - совсем его не ощущаю на себе, кроме моментов, когда подует легкий ветер оказался довольно носибельным даже в жаркие дни, но хочу сберечь его до осени - мне кажется, что именно тогда он покажет себя во всей красе
❤19🍓13🕊5
☺️mini haul w new clothes тикток почему-то не разрешает мне выкладывать видео в вещах, где у меня открыты плечи, поэтому пришлось изобрести домашнюю фотосессию на скорую руку ссылки на вещи из поста: топ zara из шелка топ zara из хлопка юбка reclaimed vintage рубашка-лонгслив zara #outfits
🕊13❤6🍓5
❤️new le labo baby vanille 44 я долго не хотела пробовать - ароматы на тему ванили не мои. но из интереса взяла отливант и влюбилась моментально, еще и так, что понадобился целый флакон для меня это нежнейший аромат ладана и церковной свечи с еле уловимой сладостью - открытой ванили в нем нет совсем. оказался очень элегантным и уместным даже сейчас, в жаркие месяца вещица редкая, поэтому смогла выловить только фла…
🕊11🍓8❤7
😍дождь + эта атмосфера несколько дней назад сняла очередное видео со своим косметическим уголком и поняла, что ни разу не рассказывала, откуда мой стол я выбирала его как временный вариант, но не думала, что он окажется таким красивым и удобным, учитывая, что он заказан из китая заказывала здесь #home
❤17🍓11🕊4
🌸моя косметичка уже где-то на 50% состоит из продуктов mac выбрала для себя палетку из шести корректоров в оттенке light, чтобы не пользоваться в летнее время полноценным тоном, а просто перекрыть нужные зоны еще не успела испытать ее, так как хочу закончить тональный стик merit, который стал мне казаться слишком плотным, особенно в жару заказывала здесь #makeup
❤14🍓4🕊4
🤩 ко мне приехала новая выборка парфюмов, которые я давно хотела попробовать в этот раз выбрала: - aesop tacit - le labo vanille 44 - diptyque ilio - dries van noten soie malaquais - les liquides imaginaires sancti - maison martin margiela beach walk мне не нравится наносить ароматы сразу на кожу, поэтому взяла небольшой набор блоттеров - еще один способ улучшить ритуал тестирования новых парфюмов блоттеры нашла …
❤10🍓4🕊2
🧴kind of meditation
🕊26🍓20❤17
😅отпускным ароматом для меня стал tom ford soleil blanc никогда не питала любви к ароматам форда, но прихватила отливант с собой в поездку - в итоге пользовалась только им в пирамиде: - фисташки - бергамот - кардамон - розовый перец - тубероза - иланг-иланг - жасмин - кокос - амбра - бобы тонка - бензоин для меня он звучит как влажная кожа после морской воды, только что смазанная солнцезащитным кремом очень жаль…
🕊8🍓6❤4
🤩i'm sorry i didn't post anything, i had a good reason произошел отдых на море в крыму с детоксом в виде полного отсутствия сети - мне понравилось.. много гуляла и снимала - сейчас в процессе выбора лучших ландшафтных снимков
❤20🕊9🍓4
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @nymphblog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 447,325 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“nymph” (@nymphblog), 1,084 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nymphblog.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.