Photo, posted without a caption

Channel
اكتوبر 🤎.
@nvvcns
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,054subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001993482759 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nvvcns |
| Created | Between 1 October 2023 and 30 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nvvcns |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 15:57 | 3,054 | -4 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 23:38 | 3,058 | -5 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:31 | 3,063 | first reading |
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 13 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 10
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 2
- of 17 we hold a reading for · 12%
- Most on one post
- 5
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nvvcns. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 October 2025 to 20 October 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
احِبچ مِن ضوة الفانوس للنَـجمة الوطِن مُصطلح بَس بحِضنچ افتهمَة.
Photo, posted without a caption
ما يجي مثلي لو تمطر سمأك أحباب 🕊.
Photo, posted without a caption
أود احتضانك كثيراً وطويلاً
Photo, posted without a caption
ممكن ينعاد الوكت الي جنت امر بي وانت وياي 🌿.
يا چَويات روحِي الـ ما أظن تبرد !!!!
Photo, posted without a caption
ياريت الناس كُلها تروح مِن بالي وبسّ أنتَ وحلاتك تگعد گبالي .
لو كان الوقت ملكاً لي لـ جعلتك دائماً معي 🌟.
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @nvvcns. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@rekharajuofficial · 83,956
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 18 August 2026
@NoSoS7 · 113,396
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 August 2026
@zzzazz · 208,198
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اكتوبر 🤎.” (@nvvcns), 3,054 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nvvcns.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.