Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

n’

@nviibe

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

990subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001267525320
TypeChannel
Username@nviibe
Created17 November 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/nviibe

Growth

983990986.58 Aug 2026, 01:32 — 983 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 11:25 — 990 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 01:328 Aug 2026, 11:25
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 982–991 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 11:25990+7
8 Aug 2026, 01:32983first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 4 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
154.3%
avg views ÷ 990 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,530
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held15 (4 July 20263 August 2026)
Views total15,279
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 01:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
42s
Average length
42s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6,938
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 15 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
1,100
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nviibe. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 July 2026 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 19:06 UTC787 views0 reactions3 Starsread 8 August 2026

заходишь в соцсети а там не просто цирк, там настоящая ментальная помойка. ты листаешь ленту и видишь как молодые пацаны полностью теряют ориентиры. они смотрят на эти блатные номера, на три семерки и три единицы, и искренне верят что статус покупается в гаи или берется в аренду на выходные. они вбивают себе в голову что без дорогой железки под ж*пой ты никто. и вместо того чтобы строить характер, качать мозги и пах

2 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC≈1,270 views0 reactions25 Starsread 8 August 2026

самая незаметная ловушка это когда у тебя что то мощно получается, и внутри тихонько начинает шептать эго «ну каков а ? все сам затащил». в Исламе у этого состояния есть конкретное название уджб (самолюбование и обольщение своими результатами). это когда ты настолько очаровываешься своим успехом, что искренне начинаешь верить, будто ты единственный архитектор этой победы. но если включить трезвость, все быстро вста

28 Jul 2026, 05:47 UTC≈1,590 views0 reactions773 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

27 Jul 2026, 15:34 UTC≈1,600 views0 reactions766 Starsread 8 August 2026

всем, кто это читает не оставляйте Дин. неважно, сколько вы совершили ошибок и как долго это продолжалось просто возвращайтесь. мы все равно не заслужим Аль-Фирдавс одними лишь своими делами, а войдем туда только по Его милости. начните снова, попытайтесь снова, молитесь. главное не опускайте руки. все еще учусь. все еще в пути.

26 Jul 2026, 00:36 UTC≈1,840 views0 reactions983 Starsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

24 Jul 2026, 18:54 UTC≈1,880 views0 reactions382 Starsread 8 August 2026

чем эмоционально зрелее вы становитесь, тем реже воспринимаете чужие поступки как что то личное. вы понимаете отношение человека к вам это отражение того, как он относится к самому себе. его осознанности, эмоциональной зрелости и внутреннего состояния. и тогда приходит простая мысль способность кого то понять, принять или полюбить вас никогда не определяла вашу ценность. она всегда говорила лишь о пределах его собств

23 Jul 2026, 09:08 UTC≈1,780 views0 reactions879 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

22 Jul 2026, 18:53 UTC≈1,640 views0 reactions778 Starsread 8 August 2026

«Когда ты делаешь дуа в спешке, а сердце не находит покоя, пусть главным твоим дуа станет просьба о прощении. Ведь если Аллах простит тебя, Он исполнит все твои нужды, даже без того, чтобы ты просил о них.» - Ибн аль-Каййим (رحمه الله)

17 Jul 2026, 18:37 UTC≈1,900 views0 reactions1,100 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

16 Jul 2026, 15:07 UTC≈1,840 views0 reactions227 Starsread 8 August 2026

я смотрю на весь этот футбольный фанатизм и не понимаю, что у людей в голове. взрослые люди готовы оскорблять друг друга, материться, драться и рвать отношения из за того, что двадцать два миллионера гоняют мяч по полю будто победа клуба положит хлеб на их стол, оплатит счета или изменит их жизнь. вы спорите так, словно вложили в этот клуб свою честь, фамилию и будущее. проиграла команда будто лично у вас жизнь зако

12 Jul 2026, 14:02 UTC≈1,890 views0 reactions1,010 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @nviibe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 906,142 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“n’” (@nviibe), 990 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nviibe.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.