9 measurements spanning 20 days, net +52. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,989–6,061 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Aug 2026, 13:33
6,050
-3
22 Aug 2026, 03:08
6,053
+9
18 Aug 2026, 17:23
6,044
+24
16 Aug 2026, 01:43
6,020
+10
12 Aug 2026, 15:24
6,010
+9
9 Aug 2026, 17:42
6,001
+4
6 Aug 2026, 09:00
5,997
-1
6 Aug 2026, 03:31
5,998
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:35
5,998
first reading
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 26 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
14.1%
avg views ÷ 6,050 subscribers
Avg views / post
855
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.11%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
22 (26 May 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
6,840
Reactions total
57
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 03:38 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
234 reactions across 17 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
208
88.9%
👍
21
8.97%
👏
3
1.28%
🤔
2
0.855%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 234reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
چرا نامیدن احساسها دشوار است؟
گاهی احساس خود را تجربه میکنیم، اما نمیتوانیم واژهی دقیقی برای آن پیدا کنیم.
ممکن است بگوییم:
“حالم خوب نیست.”
“حس خوبی ندارم.”
“خیلی بد شدم.”
یا حتی دوباره به سراغ تفسیر برویم و بگوییم:
“احساس میکنم کسی مرا نمیفهمد.”
در حالی که پشت این جملهها، احساسهای مشخصی وجود دارند؛ شاید غمگین باشیم، ناامید، دلگیر، نگران، تنها یا ترسیده باشیم.
یکی از دلایل دشواریِ نامیدن احساسها این…
در ادامه، دیدیم که برخی واژهها، بهجای بیان احساس، تفسیر یا ارزیابیِ رفتار دیگران هستند.
اما یک چالش رایج دیگر نیز وجود دارد؛ گاهی حتی جملههایی که با “احساس میکنم…” آغاز میشوند، احساس را بیان نمیکنند.
برای مثال:
احساس میکنم کسی مرا درک نمیکند.
احساس میکنم به من احترام نمیگذارند.
احساس میکنم حق با من نیست.
گرچه این جملهها با “احساس میکنم” آغاز میشوند، اما ادامهی آنها احساس نیست؛ بلکه فکر، برداشت…
دوره آشنایی با زبان زندگی
تسهیلگر: معصومه
📆 زمان شروع: مرداد ماه ۱۴۰۵
⏰ ساعت: سه شنبهها ۹.۳۰ صبح تا ۱۱.۳۰
و شنبه ها ۱۸ تا ۲۰
⏳ ۸ جلسه آنلاین در گوگلمیت
💰 قیمت: ۴ میلیون تومان
👥 ظرفیت: ۱۰ نفر
احساسها
مرحلهی دوم، بیانِ «احساسها» بهطور واضح، بدون سرزنش و تحلیل دیگران است.
بسیاری از مردم این مرحله را چالشبرانگیز مییابند، چون “واژگانِ بیانکنندهی احساس” را در اختیار ندارند. کلمههایی که احساسها را با تحلیل و سایر شکلهای ارزیابی درمیآمیزند، عموماً به مراتب بیشتر از کلمههای بیانکنندهی احساس مورد استفاده قرار میگیرند.
برگرفته از کتاب
“انسانی کردن خدمات بهداشتی درمانی”
اثر ملانی سیرز
برای م…
تا کنون ، از مشاهدهی آنچه در بیرون از ما رُخ میدهد گفتیم؛ و اینکه چگونه میان “آنچه اتفاق افتاده” و “برداشت و تفسیری که ذهن ما به آن اضافه میکند” فاصله بگذاریم.
اما مشاهده، تنها دیدن جهان بیرون نیست.
یکی از توانمندیهای مهم در مشاهده، توانایی دیدن فرایندی است که در درون ما رُخ میدهد؛ اینکه چگونه یک خبر، یک جمله یا یک روایت، وارد ذهن ما میشود و چگونه معناهای مختلفی به آن افزوده میشود.
فرض کنید در روزهای …
در ادامهی گفتوگو دربارهی “مشاهده”، شاید بد نباشد از خودمان بپرسیم:
- وقتی سخنان افراد، رسانهها یا رهبران را میشنویم، آیا فقط همان چیزی را دریافت میکنیم که گفته شده است؟
- یا گاهی، معناها، ترسها و برداشتهای خود را نیز به آن اضافه میکنیم؟
🔘 برای مثال:
گاهی در سخنان رهبران یا در خبرها با جملههایی روبهرو میشویم مانند:
▪️ روزهای حساسی پیش رو داریم.
▪️ پاسخ قاطع و تاریخی خواهیم داد.
▪️ آینده، اتفاقات …
در نوشتهی قبلی، از این گفتیم که در روزهای بحران، فاصلهی میان آنچه رخ داده و معنایی که ذهن ما به آن میدهد، گاهی کوتاهتر از معمول میشود.
شاید همین نکته، ما را به یکی از بنیادیترین مهارتهای ارتباط بدونخشونت برساند؛ مهارتی که آن را “مشاهده” مینامیم.
مشاهده، صرفاً یک مفهوم آموزشی نیست؛ تلاشی است برای دیدن آنچه واقعاً رُخ داده، پیش از آنکه قضاوتها، تحلیلها، ترسها یا باورهای ما به آن افزوده شوند.
این کار…
آشنایی با زبان زندگی
⏰ شنبهها ۹.۳۰صبح تا ۱۲:۳۰
⏳ ۸ جلسه سهساعته آنلاین
💰 ۵۸.۰۰۰.۰۰۰ ﷼ (پنج میلیون و هشتصد هزار تومان)
📆 شروع: مرداد ۱۴۰۵، اگر به حد نصاب برسد
شماره تماس جهت ثبت نام واتساپی/تلگرامی
+989355174142
+989352379034
آشنایی با زبان زندگی
⏰ یکشنبه ها ۱۸ تا ۲۱
⏳ ۸ جلسه سهساعته حضوری
حوالی میدان صنعت
💰 ۷۲.۰۰۰.۰۰۰﷼ (هفت میلیون و دویست هزار تومان)
📆 شروع: ۱۸ مرداد ۱۴۰۵
شماره تماس جهت ثبت نام واتساپی/تلگرامی
+989355174142
+989352379034
مجدداً، پس از یک دورهی سکوت طولانی، فعالیت کانال را از سر گرفتیم.
این بازگشت، برای ما با امیدی همراه بود؛ امید به اینکه شاید جامعه، هرچند آهسته و دشوار، بتواند از بخشی از این وضعیت بحرانی فاصله بگیرد و فرصتی برای از سر گرفتن گفتوگو، یادگیری و ارتباط فراهم شود.
اما رخدادهای این روزها، دوباره ما را با پرسشی جدی روبهرو کرد.
در روزهایی که بسیاری از انسانها با ترس، ناامنی، سوگ و بلاتکلیفی دستوپنجه نرم میکنند، …
❤25👍2🤔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @nvcir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 325,706 of 1,604,161entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
کتابخانه @booksofus · 55,033 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“" زبان زندگی" ارتباطی بدون خشونت” (@nvcir), 6,050 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nvcir.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.