Channel
@nursinghub
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,212subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001184130894 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nursinghub |
| Description | Study & knowledge for nursing students & Nurses For All Nursing Competitive exam Preparation Our instagram link :https://www.instagram.com/nursing_hub/ Our official website :https://nursinghub1.weebly.com/ Youtube :https://www.youtube.com/c/nursinghub |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 22 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nursinghub |
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:30 | 1,212 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (29 July 2026 – 19 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,465 |
| Reactions total | 29 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Aug 2026, 12:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
29 reactions across 11 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 17 | 58.6% | |
| ❤ | 7 | 24.1% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 10.3% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 6.90% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
WABA FULL FORM ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔥2
A client with a history of cardiac problems is having severe chest pain .what should be nurse first response?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
File, posted without a caption
🔥1
The fetal heart rate is best auscultated over the:
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The nurse assess client has waek irregular pulse ,as well as soft flabby muscles this indicates......
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
If you like our MCQs and feel our MCQs Unique from another then give reaction on Every MCQ ,Your Reaction is our Motivation....
A woman taking Centchroman ovulates normally but contraception is achieved. The MOST appropriate explanation is: 00
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔥6❤1
Centchroman is classified as a:
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤3🔥1
“Integration of health services” and “multipurpose health worker” are mentioned together. Which statement is most accurate?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔥4❤1
Which is correct sequence of family cycle?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
👏1
A patient has chest pain at rest with transient ST elevation. Troponin remains normal. The most likely diagnosis is:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nursinghub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 15 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
WABA FULL FORM ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
A client with a history of cardiac problems is having severe chest pain .what should be nurse first response?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
The fetal heart rate is best auscultated over the:
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The nurse assess client has waek irregular pulse ,as well as soft flabby muscles this indicates......
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
A woman taking Centchroman ovulates normally but contraception is achieved. The MOST appropriate explanation is: 00
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Centchroman is classified as a:
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 19 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Nursing Hub” (@nursinghub), 1,212 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nursinghub.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.