с тобой слишком хорошоо ❤️🩹
❤🔥10❤7custom 53663029762415813826💔3

Channel
@ntshh_aa
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
135subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001978981904 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ntshh_aa |
| Description | inst: ntshh__a |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ntshh_aa |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:46 | 135 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:30 | 135 | first reading |
4 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
127 reactions across 4 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5364243286020073407 | 23 | 18.1% | |
| custom 5366302976241581382 | 23 | 18.1% | |
| ❤ | 17 | 13.4% | |
| custom 5237934512662397415 | 15 | 11.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 15 | 11.8% | |
| custom 5328280128986311735 | 13 | 10.2% | |
| custom 5336867873144974886 | 8 | 6.30% | |
| 💔 | 8 | 6.30% | |
| custom 5237762460567490146 | 2 | 1.57% | |
| custom 5408998000590614372 | 2 | 1.57% | |
| custom 5204389267597437607 | 1 | 0.787% |
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 127 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
с тобой слишком хорошоо ❤️🩹
❤🔥10❤7custom 53663029762415813826💔3
🃏💔
❤9❤🔥5💔5custom 54089980005906143722custom 52043892675974376071
☀️🧸
custom 536630297624158138217custom 532828012898631173513custom 536424328602007340713custom 52377624605674901462
такие вот мыы 🤍 🤩
custom 523793451266239741515custom 536424328602007340710custom 53368678731449748868❤1
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @ntshh_aa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 600,591 of 1,629,419 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“А мне пуфик 🤍” (@ntshh_aa), 135 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ntshh_aa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.