XBot in action: https://youtube.com/shorts/vnEETn3-OTM

Channel
NSFW Marketer
@nsfwmarketer
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
31subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002098191916 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nsfwmarketer |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 21 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 6 times, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nsfwmarketer |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:36 | 31 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:02 | 31 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 21 May 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 June 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 19s
- Average length
- 19s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 May 2024 to 17 June 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
SEO juice (traffic that you don’t have to work for). This site is barely a year old.
Out of the three new sites launched that I mentioned above, which one do you think is the hentai site?
- Site 140%
- Site 240%
- Site 320%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤1
Here’s what the hentai site looks like. This niche is overly saturated for SEO, but we’re getting clicks from X. The demand is definitely there.
This is a brand new twitter page without premium. 0 to 320 followers in 7 days all automated with the XBot. This page actually has 500+ followers already. The analytics haven't updated for it yet. No clicks because I haven't added any links to this. Will start seeing clicks after today. The link will go to the coresponding tube site to send social signals for Google SEO.
https://nsfwmarketer.com/six-figures-from-a-tube-site-month-by-month-analysis-of-journey-to-1-million-visits-per-month-part-1/
We launched 3 more tube sites for the three different niches. Here is the traffic in the first 24 hours of launch. 🟢 Site1: 7 active users 🟢 Site2: 24 active users 🟢 Site 3: 9 active users It’s crazy how a porn site can get instant clicks. Meanwhile the site we launched in February is at 697 weekly active users. I want to launch as many of these as I can. Let me know if you’d like to partner.
I think if I had to start all over I would have focused on Tube Sites first. Tube sites aren't immediate money like finding a good model, blackhatting the shit out of Reddit, and selling chatting to recoup the costs. But this is type of work is low level street sweeper work. I want to own the roads. And the roads are passive traffic generating entities that work for me instead of me working for it. All my traffic …
https://nsfwmarketer.com/how-much-can-i-make-with-a-passive-income-adult-site/
Last 90 days for the twitter account for the tube site. Looks like something went viral initially (this is also when the account had a blue check). I downgraded the subscription to premium basic after the first month. It’s interesting that engagement is going up after a dip. Followers looks like it plateaued out. Nonetheless, it gets a massive amount of clicks.
Here are the stats over the last 90 days for the tube site. It’s getting a healthy level of T1 traffic.
I think what we're going to do is start developing as many tube sites as we can fund. We can go ultra-nice and focus on sweeping the long tail (just like Amazon did with books). This will be a way to directly compete with the likes of PornHub since they are focused on a general tube. If anything, I see this niche sites being an acquisition opportunity for Aylo as soon as the SEO traffic is built up.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nsfwmarketer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Out of the three new sites launched that I mentioned above, which one do you think is the hentai site?
- Site 140%
- Site 240%
- Site 320%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 May 2024 to 17 June 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NSFW Marketer” (@nsfwmarketer), 31 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nsfwmarketer.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.