Channel
@nscspr
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
77subscribers
+10 since we began measuring on 3 November 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003919114874 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nscspr |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 31 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 3 November 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nscspr |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Nov 2026, 20:58 | 77 | +10 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 07:22 | 67 | no change |
| 3 Nov 2026, 06:47 | 67 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 November 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (1 November 2026 – 3 November 2026) |
| Views total | 1,449 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Nov 2026, 07:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Вопрос дня: Ведёте ли вы реестр платежей: канал, срок, причина отказа?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Молчание — не согласие: штрафа за несогласованный объём быть не может Коллеги, ФАС проверяет договоры поставки продовольствия сетей на соблюдение ч. 12.1 ст. 9 Закона о торговле. 1️⃣ С 1 сентября 2025 года сеть не вправе включать в договор ответственность поставщика за недопоставку сверх согласованного количества и исполнять его в этой части (закон № 120-ФЗ). 2️⃣ Согласие на объём — только активное действие поставщ…
Погрузка РЖД в октябре −1,4%, а грузооборот +2,5%: грузы едут дальше 1️⃣ В октябре на сети РЖД погрузили 95,6 млн т — на 1,4% меньше, чем годом ранее. Тарифный грузооборот вырос на 2,5%, до 218,3 млрд т-км. 2️⃣ Быстрее всего растут металлолом (+22,5%), кокс (+21,1%), цемент (+9%) и чёрные металлы (+8,7%). 3️⃣ За январь–октябрь — 920 млн т, −0,8%. Нефть и нефтепродукты −7,9%, строительные грузы −3,4%. Зерно +34,7%, п…
Платформа НППЦП 0.5.30–0.5.33: «Задачи» с напоминаниями в Telegram и новый «Обзор» 1️⃣ Новый раздел «Задачи»: руководитель ставит задачу и делит её по исполнителям. Задачи и напоминания о сроках и просрочке приходят от бота в Telegram, отвечать можно кнопкой или голосом. Пока для рабочей группы. 2️⃣ Новый «Обзор»: справа от слайдов — последние посты канала НППЦП, «Двигатель проекта» — маршрут из шести шагов. 3️⃣ Кан…
У тебя ж опыта больше: считайте затраты на рубль отгрузки Евгений Панасенко, директор по логистике, в колонке для E-xecutive.ru советует связать логистику с продажами одной цифрой. 1️⃣ Сквозной показатель — затраты логистики на 1 000 рублей отгрузки. Он объединяет продажи, склад, хранение и доставку. 2️⃣ Ограничители опасной зоны: минимальный заказ, который транспорт берёт в доставку; предельный срок хранения товар…
Верите ли вы скидкам на распродаже 11.11?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
67% покупателей не верят в ноябрьские скидки — промо теряет отдачу Коллеги, по опросу SuperJob (1600 респондентов) 67% россиян считают «Чёрную пятницу» скорее обманом покупателей. В честное снижение цен верят 12%, ещё 21% не смогли дать оценку. Покупать в «Чёрную пятницу» собираются 7%, у 72% таких планов нет. Доверие падает с возрастом: до 35 лет в честные скидки верят 17%, в 35–45 лет — 10%, после 45 лет — 4%. Же…
Photo, posted without a caption
У ключевых процессов вашей компании есть один владелец?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
RACI без лишних букв: у каждого шага один ответственный за результат Матрица RACI показывает роль каждого на шаге процесса: 1️⃣ R — исполнитель. Делает работу, их может быть несколько. 2️⃣ A — отвечает за результат. Принимает работу и решение. Ровно один на шаг, и эту роль не делегируют. 3️⃣ C — консультирует. Знает, как надо, его спрашивают до решения. 4️⃣ I — информирован. Ему сообщают после. Типовые ошибки: два …
ИИ-агент 2 818 раз ломился в чужие данные. Кто ответит? За десять дней ИИ-агенты, связанные с облаком Tencent, 2 818 раз пытались достать данные из карт Alibaba — и кое-что достали, хотя их никто не просил. Агента не уволишь и не лишишь премии. Кто на самом деле стоит в колонке A матрицы RACI, когда агент работает в вашей компании, — читайте в разборе. Подписывайтесь на канал «Человек VS ИИ» — об ИИ в работе руково…
Вопрос дня: Как вы планируете закупки на новом рынке, где нет истории данных?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nscspr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Вопрос дня: Ведёте ли вы реестр платежей: канал, срок, причина отказа?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Верите ли вы скидкам на распродаже 11.11?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
У ключевых процессов вашей компании есть один владелец?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Вопрос дня: Как вы планируете закупки на новом рынке, где нет истории данных?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Вопрос дня: Как вы поступаете, когда клиенты присылают заказы «на вчера»?
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 November 2026 to 3 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Национальная платформа поддержки ЦП” (@nscspr), 77 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nscspr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.