Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for npoxa_fx

Channel

npoxa_fx

@npoxafx

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Cite this entry

1,095subscribers

-12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002446748074
TypeChannel
Username@npoxafx
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/npoxafx

Growth

1,0951,1071,1017 August 2026 — 1,107 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,107 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,104 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,098 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,102 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,099 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,096 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,098 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,095 subscribers7 August 202629 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 22 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,093–1,109 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 16:031,095-3
26 Aug 2026, 15:421,098+2
24 Aug 2026, 01:181,096-3
20 Aug 2026, 08:271,099-3
17 Aug 2026, 14:161,102+4
14 Aug 2026, 07:451,098-6
11 Aug 2026, 06:411,104-3
8 Aug 2026, 00:031,107no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:291,107first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 57s
Average length
18s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

468 reactions across 20 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍13428.6%
10021.4%
🤣6914.7%
🔥6513.9%
👎194.06%
😁194.06%
💯173.63%
🗿122.56%
👀81.71%
🎉71.50%
🤔61.28%
🐳20.427%
👌20.427%
🕊20.427%
10.214%
🍾10.214%
👏10.214%
😎10.214%
🙈10.214%
🤝10.214%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 468reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 February 2026 to 6 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
21
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 20 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @npoxafx. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 February 2026 to 6 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Jul 2026, 07:49 UTC539 views16 reactions10 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Йоу, всем привет! Со мной всё в порядке. Немного пропал, потому что занимался ремонтом, а потом ещё умудрился приболеть прямо перед своим днём рождения. 😄 Кстати, сегодня, 6 июля, у меня день рождения! Исполнилось 33 года. Так что поздравления сегодня принимаются с удовольствием. ❤️ Скоро снова вернусь к контенту, уже есть идеи, которые хочу реализовать. Спасибо, что остаётесь со мной, смотрите, пишете комментарии

🎉7😁4🔥32

17 May 2026, 10:44 UTC≈1,070 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Наверное нужно было этот вариант загружать 🤔

🤣17😁61👌1🗿1😎1

9 Apr 2026, 10:52 UTC≈1,480 views24 reactions5 Starsread 8 August 2026
Video

ПРОМТ ДЛЯ УЛУЧШЕНИЯ КАЧЕСТВА ФОТО Если ты просто вставляешь картинку в нейронку (я использовал нанабанана про) - 90% случаев она: * меняет лицо * “дорисовывает” другого человека 👉 чтобы этого не было - используй норм промт ниже. --- ### ⚠️ ВАЖНО Под каждое изображение ОБЯЗАТЕЛЬНО добавляй описание: Кто на фото: * elderly man * young boy * woman * и т.д. Особенности: * long beard * round face * tired eyes *

13🔥7👍3🗿1

26 Mar 2026, 17:36 UTC≈1,420 views16 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Приболел, уже 7 дней как. Первые дни вообще лежал пластом - слабость, голова тяжелая, нос не дышит. Я так в жизни не чихал. Прям бесконечно. Ощущение, что за эти 7 дней я начихал больше, чем за всю жизнь. Пздц 🤒 Берегите себя!

👀84🕊2🗿2

16 Mar 2026, 13:48 UTC≈1,860 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Палятся ноги или нет? Ткань кстати хорошо отрабатывает 🤔

👍148🤔6

15 Mar 2026, 12:38 UTC≈1,720 views35 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Актуально или уже нет? 🗿

🤣21🔥73🗿21👏1

14 Mar 2026, 22:44 UTC≈1,640 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Почему в AI-видео часто ломаются руки и пальцы Пару дней назад писал про пластиковые лица в AI-видео. Но есть еще одна вещь, которую многие сразу замечают. Руки. Иногда смотришь AI-видео и вроде все нормально. Лицо ок, свет ок, картинка красивая. Но потом обращаешь внимание на руки. Просто руки - это одна из самых сложных частей для генерации. --- Почему так происходит Рука - это очень сложная механика. Много

👍84🔥2

6 Mar 2026, 14:45 UTC≈1,690 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Почему в AI-видео появляются “пластиковые лица” Вчера писал, что одна из проблем AI-видео - плохие промты. Но есть и другая крайность. Иногда люди наоборот слишком стараются сделать лицо идеальным. И тогда появляется то самое “пластиковое лицо”. Наверняка замечали это. Кожа слишком гладкая. Мимика какая-то неживая. Есть ощущение, будто это персонаж из игры. Обычно это происходит по трем причинам. --- 1. Слиш

15👍1🗿1

5 Mar 2026, 13:15 UTC≈1,630 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Почему 90% AI-видео выглядят дешево Нейросети уже умеют делать почти кино. Но большинство AI-видео все равно палятся и выглядят дешево. И почти всегда проблема не в нейросети. Обычно все ломается в трех местах. --- 1. Слишком общий промт Люди пишут что-то вроде: beautiful girl dancing cinematic lighting Для нейросети это почти пустая задача. Нет сцены. Нет контекста. Нет режиссуры. --- 2. Нет контроля движ

💯164👍2🗿1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @npoxafx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“npoxa_fx” (@npoxafx), 1,095 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/npoxafx.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.