Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Записки на рукавах

@npaed

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

2,922subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001275125967
TypeChannel
Username@npaed
Created1 March 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/npaed

Growth

2,9202,9232,921.56 August 2026 — 2,920 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,920 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,923 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,922 subscribers2,9226 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,920–2,923 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 16:372,922-1
9 Aug 2026, 21:122,923+3
6 Aug 2026, 05:042,920no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:492,920first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.8%
avg views ÷ 2,922 subscribers
Avg views / post
784
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.526%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 21 of 23 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held24 (20 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total18,040
Reactions total89
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

70 reactions across 16 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1724.3%
1318.6%
🔥912.9%
😢811.4%
🤔710.0%
😁45.71%
🤷‍♂45.71%
🤩34.29%
👎22.86%
👌11.43%
👏11.43%
👨‍💻11.43%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 89reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 12:38 UTC167 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Почему регулировать стейблкоины гораздо сложнее, чем кажется? Вчера мы провели семинар, посвященный стейблкоинам и их регулированию. Разговор получился значительно шире обсуждения криптовалют. По сути, речь шла о том, как меняется архитектура платежных систем и почему привычные подходы к регулированию начинают давать сбои. Как обещали - делимся презентациями Виктора и Павла👇, а полную запись семинара можно посмотре

👍3

6 Aug 2026, 08:32 UTC420 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Как думаете, сколько примерно человек выбрали цифровой вариант?

  1. 023%
  2. 1022%
  3. 10017%
  4. 100022%
  5. 1000017%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🤩21

6 Aug 2026, 08:30 UTC385 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Маршалловы Острова (государство с населением около 42 тысяч человек) запустили программу безусловного базового дохода - выплачивают всем гражданам по $200 раз в квартал. Выплаты предлагают получать в том числе через USDM1. Если открыть новости, почти везде написано: «Маршалловы Острова запустили стейблкойн». Но есть нюанс. На официальном сайте проекта черным по белому написано: На официальном сайте проекта подчеркив

🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 12:17 UTC397 viewsread 7 August 2026

(Продолжение) К наиболее важным рискам относятся: Базовый риск: Расчёт по контракту может производиться с использованием метеорологических данных со станции, которые не отражают условия в магазине. Риск времени: Выплата может зависеть от ежедневного измерения температуры, даже если продажи сосредоточены в несколько послеобеденных часов. Риск ценообразования: Стоимость покупки защиты может быть слишком высока по ср

5 Aug 2026, 12:17 UTC366 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

По случаю жары. Мы писали несколько раз про платформы предсказаний, если коротко — там можно предложить/поставить ставку на любое событие. Изначально это был чистый беттинг, но понемногу все становится интереснее. Например, продавец мороженого может сделать ставку на холодную погоду, подстраховав возможные потери. Хеджирование мороженого: как превратить плохую погоду в управляемый риск Для магазина мороженого пого

👍1👏1🤩1

5 Aug 2026, 06:29 UTC506 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Нужно ли России отдельное регулирование стейблкойнов? Именно с этого вопроса, по сути, начинается консультативный доклад Банка России. В документе регулятор не предлагает готовое решение, а выносит на обсуждение целый ряд вопросов: • нужны ли вообще специальные правила для рублевых стейблкойнов; • какими должны быть требования к их обеспечению; • как обеспечить их погашение по номиналу; • какие требования предъявлят

4

3 Aug 2026, 09:10 UTC645 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Многие знают, что ЦБ много лет практически не выдавал новых лицензий кредитным организациям (с парой исключений типа Банк 131 в 2024). Коллега обратил внимание, что ситуация резко изменилась.

👍5🤔5👨‍💻1

2 Aug 2026, 09:28 UTC716 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

А ещё на рынке появился хороший профессиональный pr-щик с большим опытом

👍1😁1

1 Aug 2026, 19:13 UTC840 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Мы мало пишем о персоналиях, но тем не менее: вчера из НСПК ушел Олег Тишаков, который вместе с Владимиром Комлевым и другими коллегами создавал эту структуру. Одновременно практически из беларусского БПЦ ушел в HUMO Александр Сотников. Новые времена, новые платёжные системы, новые люди…

😢7🤷‍♂42

31 Jul 2026, 07:00 UTC907 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Похоже на ЦФА, но потенциально сильно больше масштабом и более привязано к классике. Европейские банки запускают новый блокчейн-консорциум RL1. В Европе появилась новая попытка решить проблему фрагментации рынка токенизированных активов. Десять финансовых институтов запустили Regulated Layer One (RL1) — кооперативную блокчейн-сеть для работы с цифровыми ценными бумагами, залогами и ончейн-деньгами. Участники включ

👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @npaed. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Aug 2026, 08:32 UTCAnonymous Quiz60 voters

Как думаете, сколько примерно человек выбрали цифровой вариант?

  1. 023%
  2. 1022%
  3. 10017%
  4. 100022%
  5. 1000017%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 260,015 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Записки на рукавах” (@npaed), 2,922 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/npaed.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.