Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

(HIATUS) 𝐍Ø𝐗𝐄𝐋𝐅Æ 𝐄𝐍𝐓𝐄𝐑𝐓𝐀𝐈𝐍𝐌𝐄𝐍𝐓

@noxelfaofc

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

566subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003066832594
TypeChannel
Username@noxelfaofc
Description𝟏𝟎 𝐉𝐚𝐧𝐮𝐚𝐫𝐢 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟔 ◈ 𝐔𝐦𝐛𝐫æ𝐱 : @noxelfa_archive ⟁ 𝐍Ø𝐗𝐄𝐋𝐅Æ 𝐎𝐟𝐜 : @noxelfabot ◇ Æ𝐥𝐨𝐫𝐲𝐧 : @noxelfa_model ⌬ 𝐍𝐲𝐱𝐚𝐫𝐚 𝐌𝐩𝐩𝐬 : @noxelfanyxbot ⧗ 𝐓𝐡𝐫𝐲𝐯𝐚𝐧𝐞 𝐌𝐩𝐩𝐬 : @mpps_noxelfa (OPEN) ◐ 𝐄𝐢𝐫𝐯æ𝐱 : @noxelfa_gram
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/noxelfaofc

Growth

5666 Aug 2026, 09:21 — 566 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 18:16 — 566 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 09:216 Aug 2026, 18:16
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 565–567 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 18:16566no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:21566first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.73%
avg views ÷ 566 subscribers
Avg views / post
15.4
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (2 August 20266 August 2026)
Views total309
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 18:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
651
Links
322

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 03:43 UTC4 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @OFCLARUBYENTRPhoto

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ 「 ─ ('⅋.) "SHINZØU WØ SΛSΛGΞYØ ⚔️ 💙 ØPΞN RΞCRUITMΞNT GΞN Ø3 .. 」 ⚔️⚔️⚔️ 🫡 ••🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍••🫡 Humanity can only move forward because someone dares to step beyond the Walls. The Scout Regiment of La Ruby Agency is recruiting new soldiers to join the next expedition. we seek those who possess unwavering determination, loyalty, and the ourage to face every challeng

6 Aug 2026, 01:29 UTC13 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

╔═〔✦ 𝐌𝐄𝐌𝐁𝐄𝐑 𝐀𝐍𝐍𝐎𝐔𝐍𝐂𝐄𝐌𝐄𝐍𝐓 ✦〕═╗ 𝐍Ø𝐗𝐄𝐋𝐅Æ 𝐄𝐍𝐓𝐄𝐑𝐓𝐀𝐈𝐍𝐌𝐄𝐍𝐓 telah menyelesaikan proses evaluasi terhadap data keanggotaan ❄️ 𝐍𝐚𝐤𝐢𝐲𝐚 𝐊𝐞𝐢𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐚 𝐀𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐚 (#𝐊ɪʏᴀ), yang memiliki peran sebagai 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐂𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐎𝐟 𝐁𝐚𝐥𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞 dari Unit 𝐁𝐋𝐕𝐑𝐄𝐗. Berdasarkan hasil evaluasi, status keanggotaan yang bersangkutan resmi dihentikan setelah tercatat melewati tiga jadwal photoshoot berturut-turut tanpa memberikan konfirmasi maupun keterangan, sehingga ti

5 Aug 2026, 02:11 UTC15 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

╔════════〔✦𝐋𝐔𝐌𝐘𝐗𝐀✦〕════════╗ ✦ 𝐖𝐈𝐓𝐇 𝐇𝐄𝐀𝐃𝐏𝐇𝐎𝐍𝐄 𝐏𝐇𝐎𝐓𝐎𝐒𝐇𝐎𝐎𝐓 ✦ 🧚🏻‍♀️ 𝐋𝐔𝐌𝐘𝐗𝐀 𝒘𝒂𝒔 𝒃𝒐𝒓𝒏 𝒇𝒓𝒐𝒎 𝒂 𝒈𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒍𝒆 𝒓𝒂𝒅𝒊𝒂𝒏𝒄𝒆, 𝒂 𝒎𝒚𝒔𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒊𝒐𝒖𝒔 𝒆𝒏𝒆𝒓𝒈𝒚 𝒘𝒉𝒆𝒓𝒆 𝒍𝒊𝒈𝒉𝒕, 𝒅𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒎𝒔, 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒅𝒂𝒕𝒂 𝒎𝒆𝒓𝒈𝒆𝒅 𝒊𝒏𝒕𝒐 𝒐𝒏𝒆. 𝑾𝒊𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒏 𝒊𝒕𝒔 𝒅𝒊𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒍 𝒅𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒎𝒔𝒄𝒂𝒑𝒆, 𝒉𝒐𝒑𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒘𝒐𝒏𝒅𝒆𝒓 𝒍𝒊𝒗𝒆 𝒊𝒏 𝒉𝒂𝒓𝒎𝒐𝒏𝒚. ⧈ 𝐋𝐔𝐌𝐘𝐗𝐀 𝐂𝐎𝐑𝐄 ⧈ 𝐀𝐬𝐚𝐛𝐞𝐲𝐚 𝐘𝐨𝐨𝐫𝐚𝐢𝐧 ✨ 𝐊𝐞𝐢𝐣𝐢 𝐇𝐨𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐲𝐮𝐤𝐢 🌙 𝐆𝐰𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐭𝐡 𝐈𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐞 𝐒𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐫 🦋 𝐘𝐬𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐞 𝐑𝐚𝐯𝐞𝐧𝐬𝐡𝐚𝐝𝐞 ⭐ 𝐍𝐚𝐤𝐚 𝐑𝐚𝐡𝐚𝐫𝐝𝐢𝐚𝐧 🌿 𝐆𝐢𝐠𝐠𝐥𝐞 𝐈𝐥𝐲𝐬𝐞𝐢𝐫𝐚 🎼 𝐋𝐨𝐮𝐲𝐢𝐞 𝐒𝐚𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐤𝐞𝐢 💫 𝐋𝐔𝐌𝐘𝐗𝐀 𝒔𝒚𝒎𝒃𝒐𝒍𝒊𝒛𝒆𝒔 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒉𝒂𝒓𝒎𝒐

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @noxelfaofc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 289,130 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“(HIATUS) 𝐍Ø𝐗𝐄𝐋𝐅Æ 𝐄𝐍𝐓𝐄𝐑𝐓𝐀𝐈𝐍𝐌𝐄𝐍𝐓” (@noxelfaofc), 566 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/noxelfaofc.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.