🔥 Любимый конструктор Рэмбо Ютубер собрал полностью функционирующий пулемёт из Lego. 📈 Level UP 👈 Подписаться
👌2👎2❤🔥1🍌1👍1

Channel
@now_Level_up
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
35,007subscribers
-9,642 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003573618998 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @now_Level_up |
| Description | Каждый день мир вокруг нас скрывает что-то новое! Интересные факты, открытия, необычные явления природы, техники и науки, а также забавные мелочи, которые делают жизнь ярче. |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/now_Level_up |
Science — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 42% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
29.2 average views per post against 35,007 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.083%. Across the 8,367 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,624–99,993 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.05% and 20.9%, with a median of 10.4%.
| Window | 30 days (29 August 2026 – 28 September 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 143 of 143 published in the window (143 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 4,172 |
| Mature posts only | 0.087% over 130 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 35,007 measured 26 September 2026 |
| Cohort | b31623:rus · 8,367 channels · p10 2.53% · p25 5.05% · p50 10.4% · p75 20.9% · p90 35.4% |
| Position in cohort | 0.215th percentile · 1/125 the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.082% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Russian · 100.0% of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 28 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 04:02 | 35,007 | -764 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 11:58 | 35,771 | -216 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 08:16 | 35,987 | -76 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 18:39 | 36,063 | -245 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 22:41 | 36,308 | -352 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 10:55 | 36,660 | -619 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 03:22 | 37,279 | -352 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 20:01 | 37,631 | -180 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 14:56 | 37,811 | -241 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 11:24 | 38,052 | -243 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:54 | 38,295 | -310 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 38,605 | -331 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:05 | 38,936 | -203 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 05:26 | 39,139 | -178 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:35 | 39,317 | -79 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 07:33 | 39,396 | -237 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:53 | 39,633 | -337 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 04:53 | 39,970 | -454 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 10:35 | 40,424 | -312 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 22:53 | 40,736 | first reading |
282 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 89 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 139 of 141 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 282 (3 August 2026 – 27 September 2026) |
| Views total | 4,120 |
| Reactions total | 738 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Sept 2026, 06:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 269 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
901 reactions across 245 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👏 | 126 | 14.0% | |
| 👌 | 125 | 13.9% | |
| 👍 | 102 | 11.3% | |
| 🔥 | 91 | 10.1% | |
| ❤🔥 | 89 | 9.88% | |
| 🍌 | 84 | 9.32% | |
| 👎 | 84 | 9.32% | |
| 💔 | 80 | 8.88% | |
| ❤ | 75 | 8.32% | |
| 😁 | 28 | 3.11% | |
| 😱 | 5 | 0.555% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 0.555% | |
| 🤯 | 4 | 0.444% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 0.111% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.111% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.111% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 245 of the 282 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 901 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 282 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔥 Любимый конструктор Рэмбо Ютубер собрал полностью функционирующий пулемёт из Lego. 📈 Level UP 👈 Подписаться
👌2👎2❤🔥1🍌1👍1
🐸 Двухцветная филломедуза Одна из немногих лягушек, которая ходит, а не прыгает. Её кожа выделяет уникальный опиоид дерморфин, который в который в 40 раз сильнее морфина. 📈 Level UP 👈 Подписаться
👌2❤1🍌1👎1💔1🔥1
🚘 Высокотехнологичное открывание дверей на BMW Z1 📈 Level UP 👈 Подписаться
👍2🔥2❤🔥1👎1💔1
🐿 Настроение: белочка 📈 Level UP 👈 Подписаться
👏4👎2👍1🔥1
☿️ Эта планета постепенно уменьшается. И вот почему Меркурий — самая маленькая планета Солнечной системы. И она действительно становится ещё меньше. Внутри Меркурия находится огромное металлическое ядро. Планета постепенно остывает, а при охлаждении её внутренние слои медленно сжимаются. Из-за этого поверхность планеты испытывает напряжение: образуются длинные уступы и огромные скалы, которые могут протягиваться …
💔4❤1❤🔥1🍌1👎1👏1
🚢 Кораблик умеет ездить и стрелять В Китае один рукастый парень создал для своих детей точную копию авианосца. 📈 Level UP 👈 Подписаться
❤2👎2👏2💔2👍1
✏️ Великолепное искусства, которое заключается в рисовании карандашами художественных произведений на бумаге Художественные произведения получаются при этом в виде 3Д формата. Такая крутая зрительная иллюзия. 📈 Level UP 👈 Подписаться
❤2💔2🔥2
🧱 Прикладная физика от африканцев Если это глупо, но работает - значит это не так уж и глупо. 📈 Level UP 👈 Подписаться
👌3👎1💔1🔥1
🌺 Голубые цветы немофилы в парке Хитачи Бич, Япония Подсчитано, что в парке Хитачи Бич насчитывается 4,5 миллиона растений немофилы. Этот парк занимает площадь в 350 гектаров, из которых 200 гектаров открыты для публики. 📈 Level UP 👈 Подписаться
🍌2👌2❤1👍1
🚗 Китайский полицейский перемещает автомобиль при помощи транспортного робота 📈 Level UP 👈 Подписаться
❤2👍2💔2🔥1
🦷 В Китае придумали гуманоидный тренажёр для стоматологов На таких жутких роботах молодые дантисты оттачивают свои навыки. 📈 Level UP 👈 Подписаться
👎2❤🔥1👍1
💡 Помянем ночных животных В Юго-Восточной Азии фермеры устанавливают светодиоды на плантациях, чтобы питайи быстрее и лучше росли, из-за чего поля там залиты светом. 📈 Level UP 👈 Подписаться
👌2👎1💔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 282 posts we hold for @now_Level_up. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Level UP” (@now_Level_up), 35,007 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/now_Level_up.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.