Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Novostroy Online|Бек-Назарова

@novostroyonline

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,650subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001981808734
TypeChannel
Username@novostroyonline
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/novostroyonline

Growth

1,6501,6551,652.57 August 2026 — 1,655 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,655 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,650 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,649–1,656 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 01:411,650-5
7 Aug 2026, 16:181,655no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:221,655first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 15 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.05%
avg views ÷ 1,650 subscribers
Avg views / post
116
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
39.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held19 (15 May 20267 August 2026)
Views total1,280
Reactions total509
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 00s
Average length
45s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

863 reactions across 18 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
24828.7%
👍15117.5%
🔥10912.6%
👌677.76%
💯667.65%
🤣576.60%
536.14%
374.29%
👏293.36%
🤔131.51%
😱80.927%
👀50.579%
😁40.463%
🤯40.463%
🐳30.348%
💔30.348%
🥰30.348%
🤩20.232%
😘10.116%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 863reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 15 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 10:24 UTC37 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Почему квартира 70 м² может стоить 15 млн, а может — 80 млн? И нет, дело не только в районе. Вы можете открыть два объявления с одинаковой площадью, посмотреть планировки и не понять, откуда разница в цене в 2–3 раза. Ответ часто кроется в том, что находится за пределами квартиры. Архитектура. Двор. Инженерия. Количество соседей. Паркинг. Лобби. Приватность. Сервис. И, конечно, локация. Именно поэтому один ЖК наз

👍108🔥72👌1👏1💯1

5 Aug 2026, 05:11 UTC69 views58 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Какие у прописанных жильцов есть особые права, которых нет даже у собственника квартиры 1⃣Право не оплачивать определенные счета, которые для собственника обязательны. Закон возлагает на членов семьи собственника солидарное обязательство по оплате коммунальных услуг (ст. 31 ЖК РФ). Но оно распространяется только на те коммунальные услуги, которые подаются непосредственно в жилое помещение (отопление, электро-, газо

19👍1814🔥4🥰2😘1

30 Jul 2026, 09:44 UTC115 views76 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Бабка vs Бабки: Выбери правильную цель!" Прочитала преступление и наказание. За 600 страниц страданий из-за бедности и классового неравенства идея пойти на работу рассматривается Раскольниковым ноль раз. Убить бабку - единственная не травматичная для него форма взаимодействия с деньгами Да купи ты студию без первоначального взноса и сдавай в аренду, перекрывая ежемесячный платёж! Или займись субарендой посуточно!

22👍21🔥214👌4💯4

29 Jul 2026, 06:30 UTC115 views47 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Бабочки в моей голове Шарики в моём потолке Одна моя подписчица пожаловалась на плохую звукоизоляцию в доме. Соседи сверху постоянно катают какие-то шары. Рассказы очевидцев звучат почти одинаково. В вечернее или ночное время они слышат звук падающих и перекатывающихся металлических шариков, доносящийся с потолка. Я живу в хорошем кирпичном доме , которому около 20 лет и постоянно слышу этот «боулинг» по вечерам

👍16🔥14🤣7👀53😁2

28 Jul 2026, 07:10 UTC130 views47 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Бесит, тешит, поражает, умиляет, раздражает… Сразу скажу, я человек уравновешенный, адекватный и со стабильной психикой. Ну, насколько это возможно после 26 лет работы в риелторском бизнесе) Но есть в нашем деле вещи, не реагировать на которые очень сложно. Мои коллеги меня поймут. Из года в год существуют покупатели «ждуны обвала цен». Что тут скажешь, фантазии нет предела. И никакие аргументы не заставят их разу

15🤣12👍10🔥6👌2🐳1👏1

27 Jul 2026, 07:23 UTC97 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ловите инсайд про кладовки Сейчас кладовки в элитных и бизнес ЖК раскупаются ещё до старта продаж. После ввода дома в эксплуатацию, такие помещения сдаются в аренду за баснословные деньги И кто же эти любители арендовать кладовки?! Эскортницы, элитные, самые настоящие Не важно, с какого подвала, главное с какого лобби выходит барышня) «Смотри, где я живу, соответствуй!» Адрес престижного ЖК создаёт иллюзию вы

13💯8👍7🤯1

24 Jul 2026, 11:54 UTC120 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🔥1312💯11

23 Jul 2026, 16:12 UTC131 views50 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

18👍15🔥14👌1💯1🤣1

22 Jul 2026, 08:18 UTC151 views55 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Иногда старые дома умеют рассказывать истории лучше людей. Стоя у этого окна, среди потрескавшихся стен и скрипа половиц, невольно ловишь себя на мысли: сколько судеб прошло через эти комнаты? Кто смотрел на этот же закат много лет назад? О чём мечтал? Кого ждал? Теперь здесь только ветер гуляет по пустым коридорам, а время медленно стирает следы чьей-то жизни. И в этой почти мистической тишине особенно остро пони

2114💯9👍3💔3🔥3👌2

21 Jul 2026, 17:00 UTC137 views41 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🤣18🔥138🐳2

18 Jul 2026, 13:49 UTC178 views40 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

18🔥12👏10

11 Jun 2026, 17:30 UTC375 views48 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

19👌14💯13😁2

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @novostroyonline. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,206,164 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Novostroy Online|Бек-Назарова” (@novostroyonline), 1,650 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/novostroyonline.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.