Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for نور على نور

Channel

نور على نور

@nourun_alanour

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

389subscribers

-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003823156194
TypeChannel
Username@nourun_alanour
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/nourun_alanour

Growth

389398393.57 August 2026 — 398 subscribers7 August 2026 — 398 subscribers14 August 2026 — 389 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 388–399 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 22:06389-9
7 Aug 2026, 07:47398no change
7 Aug 2026, 07:33398first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 9 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
91.6%
avg views ÷ 389 subscribers
Avg views / post
356
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
11
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held15 (9 July 20264 August 2026)
Views total3,921
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 07:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 23:15 UTC283 viewsread 7 August 2026

🎈Autres paroles à ce sujet : ➡️Cheikh tal3aat zahran ‏حفظه الله : Question : https://t.me/c/3928539279/73/5351 Réponse : https://t.me/c/3928539279/73/5352 Question : https://t.me/c/3928539279/73/5353 Réponse : https://t.me/c/3928539279/73/5354 ➡️Cheikh Tchalabi ‏حفظه الله : https://youtu.be/YI3sgJ8m8I8?is=aC7ssdIb394nVr_W (52:33 minutes) ➡️Cheikh Ibn Baz رحمه الله Lien 1 Lien 2 ‏سمعنا وأطعنا

4 Aug 2026, 21:50 UTC129 viewsread 7 August 2026

Toutes ces justifications ne permettent pas la contraception dans les premieres annees de mariage.De Peur d'être puni par Allah après cela

4 Aug 2026, 21:50 UTC135 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @FatawasFrTalaatZahran

Question ❓️️️️️️ Quel est le jugement de prendre des contraceptifs qui ne nuisent pas à la santé, ni à la fertilité, les premières années du mariage, tout en ayant l’intention de faire des enfants par la suite, sans crainte de la pauvreté, pour des motifs comme : • étudier les sciences religieuses • terminer ses études mondaines • travailler pour payer une bonne éducation et un bon cadre de vie à ses futurs enfants

31 Jul 2026, 06:06 UTC355 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🌷❔ Question : Certaines sœurs vendent leurs affaires d'occasion ou neuves. Parfois, elles les vendent à des mécréantes ou des personnes non voilées, tout en sachant qu'elles vont les mettre dehors (robe, jean, etc). Ont-elles des péchés ? Est-ce autorisé de vendre sachant qu'elles les mettront dehors ? 🌷✅ Réponse : ➡️On doit faire bien attention à ne pas vendre à ceux qui feront le haram avec. Sinon, pourquoi ce n

28 Jul 2026, 22:34 UTC469 viewsread 7 August 2026

🔴Autres paroles à ce sujet : Cheikh AbderRahman Moheydinne ‏حفظه الله "[...] Darwin était un juif maudit - que la malédiction d'Allah soit sur lui - comment cela peut être enseigné dans des pays musulmans ?! [...]" Cheikh Ibn Otheymine ‏حفظه الله "[...] Par contre, l'auteur de cette parole lui est véritablement un singe ! Dépourvu de raison et dépourvu de clairvoyance. Il est donc digne d'être appelé singe et non

28 Jul 2026, 21:00 UTC467 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔴❔ Question : Il est bien connu que certains estiment qu'ils sont à l'origine des animaux car ils croient en la théorie occidentale à cet égard. Quel est l'avis religieux sur ce sujet ? 🔴✅ Réponse : La théorie de Darwin présume que l'homme est à l'origine un singe, que tout fils d'Adam est un animal qui parle, que nous sommes tous des animaux.❌❌❌ Allah créa pour tout fils d'Adam une vie particulière et le dota de

26 Jul 2026, 17:39 UTC453 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

𝙇𝙚 𝙗𝙖𝙡𝙖𝙣𝙘𝙚𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩 𝙙𝙪 𝙘𝙤𝙧𝙥𝙨 𝙥𝙚𝙣𝙙𝙖𝙣𝙩 𝙡𝙖 𝙧𝙚́𝙘𝙞𝙩𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Le fait de faire vaciller ou bouger son corps au moment de la récitation s'avère être : L'œuvre des Juifs lorsqu'ils récitent la Thora et des chrétiens lorsqu'ils récitent l'Évangile, c'est-à-dire qu’il s’agit d’une action des gens du livre et nous, nous ne ressemblons pas à eux dans cela. العلامة صالح الفوزان حفظه الله ١ [...] Cela n'a pas d'origine ! Ce qui

24 Jul 2026, 07:04 UTC354 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

𝙰𝚙𝚛𝚎̀𝚜 𝚕𝚊 𝚑𝚒𝚓𝚛𝚊 🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰 Il faut donc faire en sorte que, maintenant que tu as quitté ces terres, tu laisses leur langue avec eux.✨ Et il faut fournir un effort et t'appliquer, au minimum, à parler autant que tu peux en langue arabe, et à te décider à ne pas utiliser la langue française sauf en cas d'incapacité, si vraiment tu ne peux pas faire autrement. الشيخ أبي أيمن نجيب جلواح حفظه الله ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🤎Nourunalanour

22 Jul 2026, 10:43 UTC381 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

𝙻𝚎 𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚖𝚎 "𝙴𝚜𝚌𝚕𝚊𝚟𝚎 𝚍'𝙰𝚕𝚕𝚊𝚑" 🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰 💡Al-‘abd (العبد) ne signifie pas « le serviteur », mais « l’esclave ». En arabe, le mot « le serviteur » se dit al-khādim (الخادم). Beaucoup de personnes n’aiment pas ce terme et disent que ça ne se fait pas, que c’est une humiliation ou que c’est méchant. Pour beaucoup, il est source d’ambiguïté, notamment chez les converties ou faibles dans la ‘aqida. 🔑 Comment retirer cette am

20 Jul 2026, 18:46 UTC387 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

❔Que signifie al-'abd (العبد) ?

  1. Le serviteur67%
  2. L'esclave33%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Jul 2026, 08:57 UTC508 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

💌Précieux conseil du cheikh Ibn ‘Outheymîne ‏رحمه الله تعالى, adressé aux frères éprouvés par les allers-retours après la hijra : 🤎🤎🤎🤎🤎🤎🤎🤎🤎🤎🤎 « Le conseil que j’adresse à mes frères musulmans est de ne pas transformer les bienfaits d’Allâh en ingratitude…🤩 Le voyage vers les pays mécréants, ou vers des pays dépravés -comme le dit le questionneur- représente un danger pour la croyance, un danger pour les mœurs, un da

17 Jul 2026, 10:05 UTC≈3,930 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Le comportement de la femme muslima sur les réseaux sociaux 💕 https://t.me/Rabe3elIlm ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🤎Nourunalanour 🤎Partage autorisé, modifications interdites

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @nourun_alanour. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

20 Jul 2026, 18:46 UTCFinal Results118 voters

❔Que signifie al-'abd (العبد) ?

  1. Le serviteur67%
  2. L'esclave33%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 225,840 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“نور على نور” (@nourun_alanour), 389 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nourun_alanour.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.