︎ ︎ ︎︎ ︎ ︎︎ 🍼︎𝓑𝗎𝗍 𝖨 𝖻𝖾𝗅𝗂𝖾𝗏𝖾 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝖺 𝖻𝗋𝗂𝗀𝗁𝗍 𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗄 𝗅𝗂𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝗁𝖾𝖺𝖽 🖤
custom 519086971986695056613custom 534840655618877151911custom 528273198792731394210🌚5

Channel
@notzifi
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
76subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002217214015 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @notzifi |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/notzifi |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:25 | 76 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 76 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 9 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
269 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5190869719866950566 | 76 | 28.3% | |
| custom 5282731987927313942 | 72 | 26.8% | |
| custom 5445288245153790871 | 62 | 23.0% | |
| 🌚 | 43 | 16.0% | |
| custom 5348406556188771519 | 11 | 4.09% | |
| custom 5352713416249193313 | 5 | 1.86% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 269reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 9 December 2025 to 15 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
︎ ︎ ︎︎ ︎ ︎︎ 🍼︎𝓑𝗎𝗍 𝖨 𝖻𝖾𝗅𝗂𝖾𝗏𝖾 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝖺 𝖻𝗋𝗂𝗀𝗁𝗍 𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗄 𝗅𝗂𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝗁𝖾𝖺𝖽 🖤
custom 519086971986695056613custom 534840655618877151911custom 528273198792731394210🌚5
︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎🏳🔤𝗂𝗍𝖼𝗁𝖾𝗌 𝗅𝗈𝗏𝖾 𝗆𝖾 '𝖼𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖾 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗒 𝗄𝗇𝗈𝗐 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝖨 𝖼𝖺𝗇 𝗋𝗈𝖼𝗄 🤩
custom 528273198792731394221custom 544528824515379087120custom 519086971986695056614🌚10
︎ ︎ ︎ 🔤🔤ello, hello ***, I know the things I should've said
custom 519086971986695056613custom 544528824515379087111🌚9custom 52827319879273139426
︎ ︎ ︎ 🔤🔤till somebody loses, 'cause there's no way to turn around
custom 528273198792731394214custom 544528824515379087111custom 519086971986695056610🌚5
05.02.25 — дата, в которую моя жизнь поделилась на до и после спасибо большое всем, кто был рядом в этом непростом году и принял меня такой, какая я есть, всех искренне люблю и ценю🥺
custom 519086971986695056610custom 54452882451537908718custom 52827319879273139427🌚5
🤩🤩
custom 544528824515379087112custom 528273198792731394210custom 51908697198669505667🌚3
надеюсь, больше никто не додумается мне подарить соевое мясо, я умираю от этого запаха уже который час
custom 51908697198669505669🌚6custom 53527134162491933135custom 52827319879273139424
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @notzifi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 579,721 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“♡˖ ⋮ 𝓩𝗂𝖿𝗂'𝗌 𝗇𝗈𝗍𝖾” (@notzifi), 76 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/notzifi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.