Channel
@notyourexitliquidity2
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,434subscribers
-20 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001655944422 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @notyourexitliquidity2 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/notyourexitliquidity2 |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Sept 2026, 14:15 | 1,434 | -4 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 05:40 | 1,438 | +1 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 20:37 | 1,437 | -6 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 01:18 | 1,443 | -1 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 14:37 | 1,444 | -3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 11:36 | 1,447 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 10:54 | 1,449 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 18:47 | 1,451 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 08:06 | 1,452 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:14 | 1,453 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:35 | 1,452 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:00 | 1,454 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:48 | 1,454 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 17 March 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
5,280 reactions across 20 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🥰 | 2,080 | 39.4% | |
| 🔥 | 1,012 | 19.2% | |
| ❤ | 886 | 16.8% | |
| 👏 | 547 | 10.4% | |
| 👍 | 518 | 9.81% | |
| 😁 | 160 | 3.03% | |
| 👎 | 33 | 0.625% | |
| 🤯 | 12 | 0.227% | |
| 👀 | 9 | 0.17% | |
| 😢 | 9 | 0.17% | |
| 🤬 | 9 | 0.17% | |
| 😱 | 5 | 0.095% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,280 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 March 2024 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
I've spoken to numerous traders (not scammers or insiders), and the biggest problem isn't a lack of opportunities it's the overwhelming amount of noise that has to be filtered through. These are full-time, 6-7 figure+ traders. Even they're experiencing fatigue and becoming demoralized in this current environment. Thousands of tokens are launching every day, but only a tiny percentage that are actually worth the att…
🔥12❤8👍3👏3😁1😢1
I know I've been away for a while, so I'm genuinely curious: who's still here and actually active? Are we okay? I hope we're not providing exit liquidity across 8 different chains via 20 launchpads to the same 20–30 extractors who have scammed, bundled, and manipulated their way into relevance and millions. Having been logged off for a while, I can honestly say the trenches, in their current form, aren't appealing…
❤30👍8🤯3😁3👏2😢2👀1
Unbothered. Moisturized. Happy. In My Lane. Focused. Flourishing. gm this is the time to filter out the noise and do better than you did yesterday. You’re only competing with yourself.
❤17🔥5🥰4
Nothing says “ETH is back” more than some good ole tax farming
😁17🤬4❤1👀1
People tripping over themselves lately to give money to these cabal pnders it seems. The crazy part is when they say it’s XYZ team, you mean the token they abandoned weeks ago and down over 90% make it make sense
😁16👍9🔥5❤1
🍿🍿🍿
😁13🔥3
What part of the cycle is grown men fighting about who their DADDY is?
😁11👀3😢2😱2🤯1
Vitalik needs to use those “gas fees” and do some buybacks .
😁21👀1👏1🔥1
In this market, where people send funds to blatant scammers, are openly promoting racist tokens and give attention to the worst people, don’t bother warning them about obvious rugs. If you try to help they call you a fudder because you interrupted their plan to dump on a greater fool.
🥰173❤69👍57👏38🔥38👎5
Some people are asking me the reference behind this. Without getting into the situation with Epi, my point was you can’t try to sell yourself (mainly to normies who don’t know you better) that you’re some anti scam hero dishing out tips on how to not get rugged yet you’re constantly shilling/ “advising” on soft rugs. Greed is one hell of a drug. But don’t be a wolf in sheep’s clothing. I’m going to explain everyth…
🔥167❤98🥰79👍62👏23👎5😁1
https://x.com/onchainfudder/status/1794431096697799145?s My friend just sent me this perfect timing.
🥰209🔥117👏79❤37👍14😁6👎2
You know what scammers/grifters/frauds hate the most, informed traders. I wouldn’t be surprised that over 90% of the people who have been here (& old channel) over the last year + are at portfolio ATHs. There is a reason why most scammers are pivoting to twitter to fleece the new “retail” traders. I gave up a while back in trying to warn people because at this point, if you’re willing to trade an obvious scam becaus…
🥰213❤94🔥46👏25👍17👎2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @notyourexitliquidity2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Not Exit Liquidity Liquidity Club” (@notyourexitliquidity2), 1,434 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/notyourexitliquidity2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.