«Подписные издания» прислали красивые новиночки 📖 очень хочу начать с скрытой за кошкиной головой «Корриган» Кэролайн Блэквуд, предыдущая её переведённая «Участь Мэри-Роуз» страшно понравилась
❤18🆒6💘5

Channel
@notknowing
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,335subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001147115575 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @notknowing |
| Created | 16 July 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/notknowing |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:07 | 1,335 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:53 | 1,334 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:15 | 1,335 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:10 | 1,335 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (25 June 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,020 |
| Reactions total | 188 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 20:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
453 reactions across 15 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 232 | 51.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 44 | 9.71% | |
| 💘 | 42 | 9.27% | |
| 🤯 | 36 | 7.95% | |
| 🤗 | 24 | 5.30% | |
| 🤪 | 21 | 4.64% | |
| ✍ | 17 | 3.75% | |
| 🆒 | 14 | 3.09% | |
| 👀 | 8 | 1.77% | |
| 💅 | 4 | 0.883% | |
| 🌚 | 3 | 0.662% | |
| 😎 | 3 | 0.662% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 0.442% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.221% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 0.221% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 0.221% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 453reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
«Подписные издания» прислали красивые новиночки 📖 очень хочу начать с скрытой за кошкиной головой «Корриган» Кэролайн Блэквуд, предыдущая её переведённая «Участь Мэри-Роуз» страшно понравилась
❤18🆒6💘5
всем атомный привет раскрываю очередную страницу своего лора: я обнинчанка. то есть я из города обнинска. здесь появились: первая в мире атомная электростанция, сеть surf coffee, создатель «33 квадратных метров» сергей белоголовцев, я и проект ✨станция обнинск✨ в субботу, 1 августа, ребята из станции делают ФЕСТИВАЛЬ!!! AM-0 кажется, первый на моей памяти такой крутой движ в родном городе. во-первых, будет музык…
❤33👀8😎3✍1🆒1
и подборка тематических тиктоков, первый — как раз с Уилсон
❤10🤪6💅1🆒1
Пошла на «Одиссею» в IMAX, чтобы Кристофер Нолан захаррасил мои уши и душу. Как он, видимо, intended. Море очень красивое, музыка очень древняя, сценарий очень тупой. Базовый баланс мужицкого кино. Всё было бы замечательно, если бы это был оригинальный high-brow попкорн-боевичок, чтобы потом обсуждать с друзьями физику (как все его остальные фильмы), а не женоненавистническая интерпретация культового текста 🙃 1. Чт…
❤🔥17❤5🌚3💯2💔1🗿1🫡1
сегодня у меня день рождения в этом году писала в канал гораздо чаще предыдущего — и была счастлива. Всё ещё очень люблю читать книги, думать о книгах и о процессе вокруг, это моя отдушина 🖤 если хотите меня порадовать, напишите в комментах, что вам нравится в этом канале, или репостните какой-то из постов этого года, я собрала ретроспективу любимого яркого: ⚫️критика «Дуа за неверного» 🟢как Прокофьев посетил СССр…
❤50💘15
Любопытство кошку сгубило, ведь кошка купила пыльный роман Эльзы Триоле «Душа» в красивом тбилисском книжном. Книга 1963-го года о важном вопросе — убьёт ли нас ИИ. Или как бытовать в страшный век кибернетики (надо бы нам вернуть это слово в обиход), если ты уже пережила концлагерь, располнела от ПТСР и болезней и теперь рисуешь комиксы для газет, а твой муж-изобретатель в соседней комнате мастерит прото-пинбольные …
❤22✍5💅3
Многие люди считают, что кофе придает остроты уму, но все могли убедиться, что зануды, выпив его, становятся еще занудливее. в телеграме все пьют кофе по заветам Бальзака перед написанием постов
🤗23❤6✍2
в изучении Вирджинии Вулф временный перерыв. если скучаете, советую две вещи: • «Дневник Вирджинии Вулф» (канал Георгия Лисеева из дружественного журнала Autovirus) • материал Александра Русинова (переводчика «Мемуарного клуба» и многих других вещей Вулф) о том, как писательница справлялась с жизнью — на основе её дневников
❤19❤🔥8🆒1
Posted without readable text
🤪4❤🔥2🆒1
ну что, играть в gardenscapes больше не стыдно?
🤪9💘5❤4
ничего не читала из книг Алексея Конакова, но увлеченно изучила ряд его интервью (пути кликов по ссылкам неисповедимы: перешла я к нему вообще отсюда), после которых возник вопрос: смотрит ли Алексей Конаков рилсы? поясню: я нахожу привлекательным медленный язык технико-литературной интеллигенции, которым, в частности, пародийно-оммажно написан этот мой пост, но он кажется мне продуктом медленной, созерцательной ж…
❤19❤🔥17💘7🆒4🤗1
с большим удовольствием посмотрела валин подкаст-эпос о книжных новостях последнего полугодия (цены/цензура/ии), готовя сырники по рецепту человеческой женщины с сайта поваренок точка ру
❤18💘8
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @notknowing. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
теперь все обзоры делаю только в таком стиле
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 3 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“я не знаю” (@notknowing), 1,335 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/notknowing.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.