Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for The Noticing Department

Channel

The Noticing Department

@noticingdepartment

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,324subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002070991201
TypeChannel
Username@noticingdepartment
Created19 October 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/noticingdepartment

Growth

1,3241,3281,3267 August 2026 — 1,328 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,328 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,324 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,323–1,329 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 10:161,324-4
7 Aug 2026, 11:321,328no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:221,328first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
50.6%
avg views ÷ 1,324 subscribers
Avg views / post
670
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.40%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held20 (7 April 20263 August 2026)
Views total5,357
Reactions total182
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 11:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

638 reactions across 20 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯16726.2%
🤮11317.7%
😡548.46%
😁507.84%
🤣385.96%
😈274.23%
🔥233.61%
🤬233.61%
👍223.45%
🤡213.29%
192.98%
😢192.98%
👏111.72%
👎81.25%
💩81.25%
60.94%
🎉50.784%
🤷‍♂50.784%
🌚30.47%
20.313%
9 further kinds142.19%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 638reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 April 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 11:27 UTC331 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

In China if someone sleeps with a soldier's wife they will be sent to jail. In Iran they might even be executed. In America the soldier's cheating wife will be awarded the soldier's house, custody of his kids, half his property, and continued alimony.

👍17💯11🤮1

31 Jul 2026, 13:46 UTC593 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

30 year yields at 5.26% That means for every $1000 the US borrows today, it has to pay back $2578. All that for Netanyahu.

🤮12

24 Jul 2026, 15:08 UTC594 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Holy based! Iranians referenced the foam parties in their latest LEGO video about Marco Rubio!

😁10🔥8🤮1

22 Jul 2026, 11:58 UTC975 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

The fat orange retard thought that bridges and rivers in Iran are just the same as in New York, and that hitting them is some sort of master stroke. He couldn't comprehend that Iran is an arid country, and that many rivers are seasonal, as in they flow for a month a year, sometimes less than that. So all the Iranians had to do was just drive on the dry river bed. In the meantime he handed Iran the justification to hi

🤣21💯6👍4

21 Jul 2026, 18:42 UTC515 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026

I still can't get over the fact that schoolbooks in America were literally written by the Maxwell family. That was one of the most terrifying aspects of Epstein case.

💯37

20 Jul 2026, 12:22 UTC822 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Huge FENTCOM slip up They previously claimed that only one US soldier was missing. Now they have "found" the remains of a soldier, but claim that its unidentified. But how can it be unidentified if there is just one soldier missing, right? There are more MIA than they are admitting.

🔥11

18 Jul 2026, 10:54 UTC769 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Trump's Iran war strategy condensed into one picture

💯18🤣10❤‍🔥1

17 Jul 2026, 18:20 UTC758 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Just so that you know, Trump's emptying of the SPR is only helping refinery owners. The common consumer still has to pay the full price.

🤬14

2 Jul 2026, 13:48 UTC965 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Another American dead for Netanyahu's war

😢13🎉5😁2🍾1

2 Jul 2026, 12:32 UTC≈1,250 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

"Fenced humanitarian shelters" Concentration camps. The jews are literally building concentration camps in Gaza. For 80 years they had us consume slop like "The Schinler's List" and now they're doing the exact thing without a second thought. As I said, everything they told us about the Holocaust was projection.

14💯132🥰2💩1🤮1🆒1

11 Jun 2026, 10:08 UTC819 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @gandocraftVideo

This is a World Cup opening ceremony like no other... 🏟🕊 Watch "This Time for Palestine" and name your favorite pro-Palestinian celebs from the ones in this video! You can also watch it in 4K here! 🆔 @gandocraft

5🤡4🤷‍♂3👏1🖕1😁1😈1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @noticingdepartment. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“The Noticing Department” (@noticingdepartment), 1,324 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/noticingdepartment.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.