Channel
@noticiasdelcambio
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
179subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001005032789 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @noticiasdelcambio |
| Description | Canal para seguir discusiones y artículos del partido. Invita a tus amigos a unirse haciendo click en @noticiasdelcambio El canal está abierto. Enviad contenido aquí https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1pAaa6BjGkEdt9qASjDZ64HRQgzb-_WsbflQKbrzalGA/viewform |
| Created | Between 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/noticiasdelcambio |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:02 | 179 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 179 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 15 December 2016 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 October 2019. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recuerda que tú también puedes participar desde este formulario. Ahora también se permiten las opiniones anónimas mientras sean respetuosas. Invita a tus amigos a unirse haciendo click en @noticiasdelcambio
[Recibido en el formulario] Mucho hablar de la unidad pero en nuestra provincia (en la que no se presentan los errejonistas) parece que finalmente IU y Podemos irán por separado. A veces creo que no queremos ganar. Luis Hernández (Jaén).
[Recibido en el formulario] Estaría muy bien que los líderes políticos de todos los partidos que están condenados a entenderse parasen no solo de insultarse, sino de basar su campaña política en las mentiras. Ni Iglesias ha hecho una mala negociación (aunque sí es verdad que los bandazos, las filtraciones a la prensa y los tuits de Echenique no han ayudado). Ni Errejón ha hecho un pelotazo especulativo (recuerdo a…
Channel photo updated
Vamos a volver a publicar contenido de calidad, aquí tenéis el formulario para enviar mensajes y artículos. No se publicará contenido sin firmar. https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1pAaa6BjGkEdt9qASjDZ64HRQgzb-_WsbflQKbrzalGA/viewform
Channel name was changed to «Artículos sobre el Bloque del Cambio»
¿Creéis que esta página debería centrarse en todo el espacio del cambio y así tener una perspectiva más amplia?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
¿Qué partido te representa más?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Si quieres añadir contenidos y textos al canal @noticiaspodemos puedes hacerlo a través de este formulario. La utilidad de este formulario no es otra que el envío de textos como los que se publican aquí, textos que tienen como finalidad elevar el debate de Podemos, así que cualquier otro contenido se ignorará. https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1pAaa6BjGkEdt9qASjDZ64HRQgzb-_WsbflQKbrzalGA/viewform
Volvemos a aceptar contenido. Formulario en la descripción.
https://twitter.com/saracarrenov/status/992315985926475776
Channel name was changed to «Artículos sobre Podemos.»
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @noticiasdelcambio. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
¿Creéis que esta página debería centrarse en todo el espacio del cambio y así tener una perspectiva más amplia?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
¿Qué partido te representa más?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 December 2016 to 28 October 2019. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
@noticiasdelcambio named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Artículos sobre el Bloque del Cambio” (@noticiasdelcambio), 179 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/noticiasdelcambio.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.